View More View Less
  • 1 I. sz. Sebészeti Klinika, Semmelweis Egyetem, Budapest
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $25.00

1 year subscription (Individual Only)

USD  $356.00
  • 1. C Pulitano RW Parks H Ireland et al. 2011 Impact of concomitant arterial injury on the outcome of laparoscopic bile duct injury Am J Surg 201 238 44.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2. RW Parks 2011 Contemporary management of bile duct injuries Hepatobiliary Surgery 29 12 618 21.

  • 3. R Tacchino F Greco D Matera 2009 Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgery without a visible scar Surg Endosc 13 1 896 9.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. KN Lau D Sindram N Agee et al. 2010 Bile Duct Injury After Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 14 587 91.

  • 5. CR Bernex 2011 Major common bile duct injury and risk of litigation: a surgeon's perspective The American Journal of Surgery DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.06.009.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. K Shimada S Nara M Esaki et al. 2011 Extended right hemihepatectomy for gallbladder carcinoma involving the hepatic hilum Br J Surg 98 117 23.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. Ch Lim J Jang SE Lee et al. 2012 Reappraisal of Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy as a Treatment Modality for Bile Duct and Gallbladder Carcinoma J Gastrointest Surg DOI:10.1007/s11605-012-1826-5.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8. JM Winter JL Cameon K Olino et al. 2010 Clinicopathologic Analysis of Ampullary Neoplasms in 450 Patients: Implications for Surgical Strategy and Long-Term Prognosis J Gastrointest Surg 14 379 87.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9. P Neuhaus A Thelen S Jonas et al. 2011 Oncological Superiority of Hilar En Bloc Resection for the Treatment of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Ann Surg Oncol DOI:10.1245/s10434-011-2077-5.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. A Saxena TC Chua FC Chu DL Morris 2011 Improved outcomes after aggressive surgical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a critical analysis of recurrence and survival Am J Surg 202 310 20.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11. D Ribero M Amisano R Lo Tesoriere et al. 2011 Additional Resection of an Intraoperative Margin-Positive Proximal Bile Duct Improves Survival in Patients with Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Ann Surg 254 776 83.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. SC Schiffman NP Reuter KM McMasters et al. 2012 Overall Survival Peri-Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: R1 Resection With Curative Intent Compared to Primary Endoscopic Therapy J Surg Oncol 105 91 6.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. MB Beltrán AS Allal I Gich et al. 2012 Is adjuvant radiotherapy needed after curative resection of extrahepatic biliary tract cancers? A systematic review with a meta-analysis of observational studies Cancer Treatment Rev 38 111 9.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. LE Tabone S Sarker PM Fisichella et al. 2011 To ‘gram or not’? Indications for intraoperative cholangiogram Surgery 150 4 810 9.

  • 15. JA Ford M Soop J Du et al. 2012 Systematic review of intraoperative cholangiography in cholecystectomy Br J Surg 99 160 7.

  • 16. K Gurusamy SJ Sahay AK Burroughs BR Davidson 2011 Systematic review and meta-analysis of intraoperative versus preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladder and suspected common bile duct stones Br J Surg 98 908 16.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17. T Yasiu S Takahata H Kono et al. 2011 Is cholecystectomy necessary after endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones in patients older than 80 years of age? J Gastroenterol DOI:10.1007/s00535-011-0461-3.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18. BI Lengyel D Azagury O Varban et al. 2011 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after a quarter century: why do we still convert Surg Endosc 26 508 13.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19. G Subhas A Gupta J Bhullar et al. 2011 Prolonged (longer than 3 hours) laparoscopic cholecystectomy: reasons and results Am Surg 77 8 981 4.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. T Schnelldorfer MG Sarr DB Adams 2011 What is the Duct of Luschka? – A systematic Review J Gastrointest Surg DOI:10.1007/s11605-011-1802-5.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21. R Memeo A Belli MD Kluger et al. 2012 Duct-to-Duct Biliary Reconstruction During Complex Hepatectomy: A Useful Technique in Selected Cases World J Surg 36 129 35.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22. F Fiocca FM Salvatori F Fanelli et al. 2011 Complete transsection of the main bile duct: minimally invasive treatment with an endoscopic-radiologic rendezvous Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 74 6 1393 8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Submit Your Manuscript

 

The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE

 

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Oláh, Attila

Editorial Board

  • DR. BÁLINT ANDRÁS
  • DR. BEZSILLA JÁNOS
  • DR. BOROS MIHÁLY
  • DR. BURSICS ATTILA
  • DR. DAMJANOVICH LÁSZLÓ
  • DR. ENTZ LÁSZLÓ
  • DR. GULYÁS GUSZTÁV
  • DR. HARSÁNYI LÁSZLÓ
  • DR. HORVÁTH ÖRS PÉTER
  • DR. ISTVÁN GÁBOR
  • DR. KECSKÉS LÁSZLÓ
  • DR. KÓBORI LÁSZLÓ
  • DR. KUPCSULIK PÉTER
  • DR. LÁZÁR GYÖRGY
  • DR. LESTÁR BÉLA
  • DR. MÁTRAI ZOLTÁN
  • DR. MOHOS ELEMÉR
  • DR. MOLNÁR F. TAMÁS
  • DR. ONDREJKA PÁL
  • DR. PAPP ANDRÁS
  • DR. RÉNYI-VÁMOS FERENC
  • DR. ROMICS LÁSZLÓ JR.
  • DR. SÓTONYI PÉTER
  • DR. SZIJÁRTÓ ATTILA
  • DR. SZŰCS ÁKOS
  • DR. VEREBÉLY TIBOR
  • DR. VERECZKEI ANDRÁS

Petz Aladár County Teaching Hospital, Surgery
Vasvári Pál út 2. H-9024 Győr, Hungary
Phone: +36 96 503 320 --- Fax: +36 96 507 936
E-mail: olaha@petz.gyor.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Index Medicus
  • PubMed Central

 

2020  
CrossRef Documents 37
WoS Cites 45
Wos H-index 8
Days from submission to acceptance 60
Days from acceptance to publication 63

 

2019  
WoS
Cites
63
CrossRef
Documents
31

 

Magyar Sebészet
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription Information Online subsscription: 276 EUR / 372 USD
Print + online subscription: 320 EUR / 440 USD
Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

Magyar Sebészet
Language Hungarian
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1947
Publication
Programme
2021 Volume 74
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Magyar Sebész Társaság -- Hungarian Surgical Society
Founder's
Address
H-1082 Budapest, Hungary Üllői út 78.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0025-0295 (Print)
ISSN 1789-4301 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Feb 2021 11 0 0
Mar 2021 7 0 0
Apr 2021 4 0 0
May 2021 7 0 0
Jun 2021 13 0 0
Jul 2021 7 0 0
Aug 2021 0 0 0