Author:
Ferenc Jakab Uzsoki Utcai Kórház, 1145, Budapest, Uzsoki u. 29–41.

Search for other papers by Ferenc Jakab in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Absztrakt

A szerző a betegbiztonság követelményeiből kiindulva a kockázatanalízis fontosságára hívja fel a figyelmet. Megállapítja, hogy a minőségi követelmények növekedése nem hagyta érintetlenül a sebészetet sem, és ezért ma már konkrét fogalmaink vannak a sebészi kockázat meghatározására és értékelésére. Ez a folyamat az elmúlt évtizedekben a mind gyakrabban indikált és mind szélesebb körben végzett, növekvő számú májműtétek halálozásának jelentős csökkenésében is nyomon követhető. Különös fontossága van a műtétek kockázatának májbetegeken. A feltétlen vagy abszolút ellenjavallatok jól körülhatárolhatók. A májbetegeken tervezett májműtétetek kockázata számszerűen is kifejezhető. A régóta használt Child–Turcotte–Pugh-stádiumai számértékek alapján határozhatók meg. Újabban az „50–50-es” szabály, illetve a májtranszplantációs gyakorlatból átvett MELD érték kiszámítása jelent a sebésznek objektív fogódzót a mindennapos munkájában. A szerző kitér a kockázatanalízis alapján választható kezelési optimalizációra is, amely a májsebészek igényei alapján multidiszciplináris megközelítésben valósulhat meg.

  • 1. LS Friedman 1999 The risk of surgery in patients with liver disease Hepatology 29 1617 23.

  • 2. DD Hardville WH Summerskill 1963 Surgery in acute hepatitis. Causes and effects JAMA 184 257 61.

  • 3. D Dindo N Demartines PA Clavien 2004 Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey Ann Surg 240 205 13.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. JG O’Leary LS Friedman 2007 Predicting surgical risk in patients with cirrhosis: from art to science Gastroenterology 132 1609 11.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5. SH Teh DM Nagorney SR Stevens 2007 Risk factors for mortality after surgery in patients with cirrhosis Gastroenterology 132 1261 9.

  • 6. U Wolters T Wolf H Stützer et al.1996 ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of postoperative outcome Br J Anaesth 77 217 22.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. WC Shoemaker PL Appel HB Kram et al.1988 Prospective trial of supranormal values of survivors as therapeutic goals in high-risk surgical patients Chest 94 1176 86.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8. O Boyd N Jackson 2005 How is risk defined in high risk surgical patient management Crit Care 9 390 6.

  • 9. WA Knaus DP Wagner EA Draper et al.1991 The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults Chest 100 1619 36.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. C Nobili E Marzano E Oussoultzoglou et al.2012 Multivariate analysis of risk factors for pulmonary complications after hepatic resection Ann Surg 255 540 50.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11. GP Copeland D Jones M Walters 1991 POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit Br J Surg 78 355 60.

  • 12. JB Sobol H Wunsch 2011 Triage of high-risk surgical patients for intensive care Crit Care 15 217.

  • 13. T Patel 1999 Surgery in the patients with liver disease May Clin Proc 7 593 9.

  • 14. WP Mikkelsen WH Kern 1974 The influence of acute hyaline necrosis on survival after emergency and elective portacaval shunt Major Probl Clin Surg 14 233 42.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15. G Garcea GJ Maddern 2009 Liver failure after major hepatic resection J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16 145 55.

  • 16. J Bruix A Castells J Bosch et al.1996 Surgical resection of HCC in cirrhotic patients. Prognostic value of preoperative portal pressure Gastroenterology 111 1018 22.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17. A Ruzzente A Valdegamber T Camopagnaro et al.2011 HCC in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension: Is liver resection always contraindicated World J Gastroenterol 17 5083 8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18. E Boleslawski C Petrovai S Truant et al.2012 Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient in the Assessment of Portal Hypertension before Liver Resection in Patients with Cirrhosis Br J Surg 99 855 63.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19. C Ripoll R Groszmann G Garcia-Tsao et al.2007 Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient Predicts Clinical Decompensation in Patients with Compensated Cirrhosis Gastroenterology 1331 481 8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. X Chen J Zhai X Cai et al.2012 Severity of Portal Hypertension and Prediction of Postoperative Liver Failure after Liver Resection in Patients with Child–Pugh-Grade “A” Cirrhosis Br J Surg 99 1701 10.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21. S Stremitzer D Tamandi K Kaczirek et al.2011 Value of Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient Measurement before Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Br J Surg 98 l752 8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22. E Llop A Berzigotti M Reig et al.2012 Assessment of Portal Hypertension by Transient Elastography in Patients with Compensated Cirrhosis and Potentially Resectable Liver Tumors J Hepatol 56 103 8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23. TN Johnson GT Tucker SM Tanner 2005 Changes in Liver Volume from Birth to Adulthood: A Meta-Analysis Liver Transpl 11 1481 93.

  • 24. M Makuuchi K Sano 2004 The Surgical Approach to HCC: Our Progress and Results in Japan Liver Transpl 10 46 52.

  • 25. M Malinhoc PS Kamath FD Gordon et al.2000 A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts Hepatology 31 864 71.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26. J Belghiti M Kabbej A Sauvanet et al.1993 Drainage after elective hepatic resection. A randomized trial Ann Surg 218 748 53.

  • 27. Y Fong MF Brennan K Brown et al.1996 Drainage is unnecessary after elective liver resection Am J Surg 171 158 62.

  • 28. CL Liu ST Fan CM Lo et al.2004 Abdominal drainage after hepatic resection is contraindicated in patients with chronic liver diseases Ann Surg 239 194 201.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29. MT De Boer IQ Molenaar RJ Porte 2007 Impact of blood loss on outcome after liver resection Dig Surg 24 259 64.

  • 30. Merchant N , David CS, Cunningham SC: Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Transplantation versus Resection: The Case for Liver Resection. Int J Hepatol 2011; Article ID N 14085, 7 pages.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31. TR Poon ST Fan CM Lo et al.2004 Improving Perioperative Outcome Expands the Role of Hepatectomy in Management of Benign and Malignant Hepatobiliary Diseases. Analysis of 1222 Consecutive Patients from a Prospective Database Ann Surg 240 698 10.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32. KA Wlodzomirow S Eslami RA Chamuleau et al.2012 Prediction of Poor Outcome in Patients with Acute Liver Failure – Systematic Review of Prediction Models PLoS One 7 e509952.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33. Mukerji AN , Patel V, Jain A: Improving Survival in Decompensated Cirrhosis. Int J Hepatol 2012; Article ID: 318627, 14 pages.

  • 34. SE Yantorno W Kremers AE Kruf et al.2007 MELD is superior to King's College and Clichy's criteria to assess prognosis in fulminant hepatic failure Liver Transpl 13 822 8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35. A Pauwels N Mostefa-Kara C Florent et al.1993 Emergency Liver Transplantation for Acute Liver Failure. Evaluation of London and Clichy criteria J Hepatol 17 124 7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36. E Cholongitas L Marelli V Shusang et al.2006 A systematic review of the performance of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) in the setting of liver transplantation Liver Transpl 12 1049 61.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37. iLiver EASL 2012. http://www.easl.eu/events/the-international-liver-congress/the-international-liver-congress-2012.

  • 38. D Franco L Capusotti C Smadja et al.1990 Resection of HCC results in 72 European patients with cirrhosis Gastroenterology 98 733 8.

  • 39. R Noun P Jaget O Farges 1997 High preoperative serum AST levels: effect on the risk of liver resection in Child grade A cirrhotic patients World J Surg 21 390 5.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40. H Lau K Man ST Fan et al.1997 Evaluation of preoperative hepatic function in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing hepatectomy Brit Surg 84 1255 9.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41. M Makuuchi T Kosuge T Takayama et al.1993 Surgery for small liver cancers Semin Surg Oncol 9 298 304.

  • 42. ST Fan EC Lai CM Lo et al.1995 Hospital mortality of major hepatectomy for HCC associated with cirrhosis Archives of Surgery 130 198 203.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43. CC Wu WL Ho DC Yeh et al.1996 Hepatic resection of HCC in cirrhotic livers is it unjustified in impaired liver function Surgery 120 34 9.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44. H Hasegawa S Yamazaki M Makuuchi D Elias 1987 Hepatectomy for hepato carcinoma on a cirrhotic liver: decision plans and principles of perioperative resuscitation. Experience with 204 cases J Chir 124 425 31.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45. AW Hemming CH Scudomore CR Shackleton et al.1992 Indocyanine green clearance as a predictor of successful hepatic resection in cirrhotic patients Am J Surg 163 515 8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 46. T Kanematsu J Furui K Janaga et al.2002 A 16-year experience in performing hepatic resection in 303 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma 1995–2000 Surgery 131(1 suppl) 153 8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47. A Grieco R Castellano A Matera et al.1998 Antipyrine clearance in chronic and neoplastic liver diseases: a study of 518 patients J Gastroenterol Hepatol 13 460 6.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48. KJ Paquet P Koussouris MA Mercado 1991 Limited hepatic resection for selected cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular or cholangiocellular carcinoma. A prospective study Br J Surg 78 459 62.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49. G Ercolani GL Grazi R Calliva et al.2000 The lidocaine (MEGX) test as an index of hepatic function: its clinical usefulness in liver surgery Surgery 127 464 71.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 50. GL Grazi G Ercolani F Pieraugehi et al.2001 Improved results of liver resection for HCC on cirrhosis give the procedure added value Ann Surg 234 71 8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 51. XY Yin MD Lau JF Huang et al.2001 Significance of portal hemodynamic investigation in prediction of hepatic functional reserve in patients with HCC undergoing operative treatment Hepatogastroenterology 48 1701 4.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 52. D Azoulay D Castaing J Krissat 2000 Percutaneous portal vein embolization increases the feasibility and safety of major liver resection for HCC in injured liver Ann Surg 232 665 72.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 53. KK Christians HA Pitt WS Rilling et al.2001 HCC: multimodality management Surgery 130 554 9.

  • 54. K Hanazaki S Kajikawa N Shimozawa et al.2001 Hepatic resection for large HCC Am J Surg 181 347 53.

  • 55. G Ercolani GL Grazi M Rovaioli et al.2003 Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma cirrhosis Ann Surg 237 536 43.

  • 56. H Neeff F Makowiec J Harder et al.2009 Hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma results and analysis of the current literature Zentralbl Chir 2 127 35.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 57. BH Lang RT Poon J Wong 2003 Perioperative and long-term outcome of major hepatic resection for small solitary hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis Arch Surg 138 1207 13.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 58. JPEN Pierie A Muzikansky K Tanabe et al.2005 The outcome of surgical resection versus assignment to the liver transplant waiting liver for hepatocellular carcinoma Ann Surg Oncol 12 552 60.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 59. C Margarit A Escartin E Castels 2005 Resection for HCC is a good option in Child–Turcotte–Pugh A class a patients with cirrhosis who are eligible for liver transplantation Liver Transpl 11 1242 51.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 60. RTP Poon ST Fan CM Lo et al.2007 Difference in tumor invasiveness in cirrhotic patients with HCC fulfilling the Milan criteria treated by resection or transplantation: impact on long-term survival Ann Surg 245 51 8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 61. U Cillo A Vitale A Brolese et al.2007 Partial hepatectomy as first lime treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma J Surg Oncol 95 213 20.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 62. M Del Gaudio G Ercolani M Ravaioli 2008 Liver Transplantation for recurrent HCC on cirrhosis after liver resection. University of Bologna Experience Am J Transplant 6 1177 85.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 63. EC Bellavance KM Lumpkins G Mentha et al.2008 Surgical management of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: resection or transplantation J Gastroint Surg 12 1699 708.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 64. GC Sotiropoulos N Drühe G Sgourakis et al.2009 Liver transplantation, liver resection and transarterial chemoembolization for HCC in cirrhosis which is the best oncological approach Dig Dis Sci 54 2264 73.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 65. I Zhou Z Wang SJ Quic et al.2010 Surgical treatment for early HCC comparison of resection and liver transplantation J Canc Res Clin Oncol 136 1453 60.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collapse
  • Expand

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Oláh, Attila

Editorial Board

  • DR. BÁLINT ANDRÁS
  • DR. BEZSILLA JÁNOS
  • DR. BOROS MIHÁLY
  • DR. BURSICS ATTILA
  • DR. DAMJANOVICH LÁSZLÓ
  • DR. ENTZ LÁSZLÓ
  • DR. GULYÁS GUSZTÁV
  • DR. HARSÁNYI LÁSZLÓ
  • DR. HORVÁTH ÖRS PÉTER
  • DR. ISTVÁN GÁBOR
  • DR. KECSKÉS LÁSZLÓ
  • DR. KÓBORI LÁSZLÓ
  • DR. KUPCSULIK PÉTER
  • DR. LÁZÁR GYÖRGY
  • DR. LESTÁR BÉLA
  • DR. MÁTRAI ZOLTÁN
  • DR. MOHOS ELEMÉR
  • DR. MOLNÁR F. TAMÁS
  • DR. ONDREJKA PÁL
  • DR. PAPP ANDRÁS
  • DR. RÉNYI-VÁMOS FERENC
  • DR. ROMICS LÁSZLÓ JR.
  • DR. SÓTONYI PÉTER
  • DR. SZIJÁRTÓ ATTILA
  • DR. SZŰCS ÁKOS
  • DR. VEREBÉLY TIBOR
  • DR. VERECZKEI ANDRÁS

Petz Aladár County Teaching Hospital, Surgery
Vasvári Pál út 2. H-9024 Győr, Hungary
Phone: +36 96 503 320 --- Fax: +36 96 507 936
E-mail: olaha@petz.gyor.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Index Medicus
  • PubMed Central
  • CABELLS Journalytics

 

Magyar Sebészet
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription fee 2025 Online subsscription: 332 EUR / 380 USD
Print + online subscription: 380 EUR / 452 USD
Subscription Information

Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.

Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

Magyar Sebészet
Language Hungarian
Size A4
Year of
Foundation
1947
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Magyar Sebész Társaság -- Hungarian Surgical Society
Founder's
Address
H-1082 Budapest, Hungary Üllői út 78.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0025-0295 (Print)
ISSN 1789-4301 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Apr 2024 26 0 0
May 2024 10 0 0
Jun 2024 21 0 0
Jul 2024 23 0 0
Aug 2024 14 0 0
Sep 2024 27 0 0
Oct 2024 0 0 0