1. Biel, A., Thogersen, J. (2007): Activation of social norms in social dilemmas: A review of the evidence and reflections on the implications for environmental behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28 (1), 93–112.

1. Biel, A., Thogersen, J. (2007): Activation of social norms in social dilemmas: A review of the evidence and reflections on the implications for environmental behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28 (1), 93–112.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

2. Brockner, J., Heuer, L., Siegel, P. A., Wiesenfeld, B., Martin, C., Grover, S., Reed, T., Bjorgvinsson, S. (1998): The moderating effect of self-esteem in reaction to voice: Converging evidence from five studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75 (2), 394–407.

2. Brockner, J., Heuer, L., Siegel, P. A., Wiesenfeld, B., Martin, C., Grover, S., Reed, T., Bjorgvinsson, S. (1998): The moderating effect of self-esteem in reaction to voice: Converging evidence from five studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75 (2), 394–407.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

3. Brockner, J., Siegel, P. (1996): Understanding the interaction between procedural and distributive justice: The role of trust. In: R. M. Kramer, T. R. Tyler (eds), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, Sage, 390–413.

3. Brockner, J., Siegel, P. (1996): Understanding the interaction between procedural and distributive justice: The role of trust. In: R. M.Kramer, T. R.Tyler (eds), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, Sage, 390–413.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

4. Brucks, W. M., Van Lange, P. A. M. (2007): When prosocials act like proselfs in a commons dilemma. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33 (5), 750–758.

4. Brucks, W. M., Van Lange, P. A. M. (2007): When prosocials act like proselfs in a commons dilemma. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33 (5), 750–758.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

5. Carnevale, P. J. (2006): Creativity in the outcomes of conflict. In: M. Deutsch, P. T. Coleman, E. C. Marcus (eds), The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 414–435.

5. Carnevale, P. J. (2006): Creativity in the outcomes of conflict. In: M.Deutsch, P. T.Coleman, E. C.Marcus (eds), The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 414–435.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

6. Carnevale, P. J., Pruitt, D. G. (1992): Negotiation and mediation. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 531–582.

6. Carnevale, P. J., Pruitt, D. G. (1992): Negotiation and mediation. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 531–582.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

7. Dawes, R. M., McTavish, J., Shaklee, H. (1977): Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35 (1), 1–11.

7. Dawes, R. M., McTavish, J., Shaklee, H. (1977): Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35 (1), 1–11.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

8. De Dreu, C. K. W., Weingart, L. R., Kwon, S. (2000): Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: A meta-analytic review and test of two theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78 (5), 889–905.

8. De Dreu, C. K. W., Weingart, L. R., Kwon, S. (2000): Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: A meta-analytic review and test of two theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78 (5), 889–905.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

9. Eek, D., Gärling, T. (2008): A new look at the theory of social value orientations: Prosocials neither maximize joint outcome nor minimize outcome differences but prefer equal outcomes. In: A. Biel, D. Eek, T. Gärling, M. Gustafsson (eds), New Issues and Paradigms in Research on Social Dilemmas. New York, Springer, 10–26.

9. Eek, D., Gärling, T. (2008): A new look at the theory of social value orientations: Prosocials neither maximize joint outcome nor minimize outcome differences but prefer equal outcomes. In: A.Biel, D.Eek, T.Gärling, M.Gustafsson (eds), New Issues and Paradigms in Research on Social Dilemmas. New York, Springer, 10–26.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

10. Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., Grove, J., Corkran, L. (1979): Effects of “voice” and peer opinions on responses to inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 (12), 2253–2261.

10. Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., Grove, J., Corkran, L. (1979): Effects of “voice” and peer opinions on responses to inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 (12), 2253–2261.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

11. Fülöp Márta (2008): Paradigmaváltás a versengéskutatásban. Pszichológia, 28 (2), 113–140.

11. Fülöp Márta (2008): Paradigmaváltás a versengéskutatásban. Pszichológia, 28 (2), 113–140.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

12. Gächter, S. (2004): Behavioral game theory. In: D. J. Koehler, N. Harvey (eds), Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making. Oxford, Blackwell Publishers, 485–503.

12. Gächter, S. (2004): Behavioral game theory. In: D. J.Koehler, N.Harvey (eds), Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making. Oxford, Blackwell Publishers, 485–503.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

13. Greenberg, J., Folger, R. (1983): Procedural justice, participation, and the fair process effect in groups and organizations. In: P. B. Paulus (ed.), Basic Group Processes. New York, Springer, 235–256.

13. Greenberg, J., Folger, R. (1983): Procedural justice, participation, and the fair process effect in groups and organizations. In: P. B.Paulus (ed.), Basic Group Processes. New York, Springer, 235–256.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

14. Grzelak, J. (1995): Konfliktus és kooperáció. In: M. Hewstone, W. Stroebe, J. P. Codol, G. M. Stephenson (szerk.), Szociálpszichológia európai szemszögből. Budapest, KJK, 313–339.

14. Grzelak, J. (1995): Konfliktus és kooperáció. In: M.Hewstone, W.Stroebe, J. P.Codol, G. M.Stephenson (szerk.), Szociálpszichológia európai szemszögből. Budapest, KJK, 313–339.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

15. Hankiss Elemér (1983): Társadalmi csapdák. Budapest, Magvető Kiadó.

15. Hankiss Elemér (1983): Társadalmi csapdák. Budapest, Magvető Kiadó.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

16. Horváth Andrea (2003): Konfliktusok társas kapcsolatokban. Debrecen, Kossuth Egyetemi Kiadó.

16. Horváth Andrea (2003): Konfliktusok társas kapcsolatokban. Debrecen, Kossuth Egyetemi Kiadó.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

17. Jussim, L. (1991): Social perception and social reality: A reflection-construction model. Psychological Review, 98 (1), 54–73.

17. Jussim, L. (1991): Social perception and social reality: A reflection-construction model. Psychological Review, 98 (1), 54–73.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

18. Kelley, H. H., Stahelski, A. J. (1970): Social interaction basis of cooperators’ and competitors’ beliefs about others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16 (1), 66–91.

18. Kelley, H. H., Stahelski, A. J. (1970): Social interaction basis of cooperators’ and competitors’ beliefs about others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16 (1), 66–91.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

19. Lind, E. A. (2001): Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In: J. Greenberg, R. Cropanzano (eds), Advances in Organizational Justice. Stanford, Stanford University Press, 56–88.

19. Lind, E. A. (2001): Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In: J.Greenberg, R.Cropanzano (eds), Advances in Organizational Justice. Stanford, Stanford University Press, 56–88.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

20. Messé, L. A., Sivacek, J. M. (1979): Predictions of others’ responses in a mixed-motive game: Self-justification or false consensus? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 (4), 602–607.

20. Messé, L. A., Sivacek, J. M. (1979): Predictions of others’ responses in a mixed-motive game: Self-justification or false consensus?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 (4), 602–607.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

21. Messick, D. M., McClintock, C. G. (1968): Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4 (1), 1–25.

21. Messick, D. M., McClintock, C. G. (1968): Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4 (1), 1–25.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

22. Mullen, B., Atkins, J. L., Champion, D. S., Edwards, C., Hardy, D., Story, J. E., Vanderklok, M. (1985): The false consensus effect: A meta-analysis of 115 hypothesis tests. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21 (3), 262–283.

22. Mullen, B., Atkins, J. L., Champion, D. S., Edwards, C., Hardy, D., Story, J. E., Vanderklok, M. (1985): The false consensus effect: A meta-analysis of 115 hypothesis tests. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21 (3), 262–283.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

23. Neugebauer, T., Perote, J., Schmidt, U., Loos, M. (2009): Selfish-biased conditional cooperation: On the decline of contributions in repeated public goods experiments. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30 (1), 52–60.

23. Neugebauer, T., Perote, J., Schmidt, U., Loos, M. (2009): Selfish-biased conditional cooperation: On the decline of contributions in repeated public goods experiments. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30 (1), 52–60.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

24. Orbell, J., Dawes, R., Schwartz-Shea, P. (1994): Trust, social categories and individuals: The case of gender. Motivation and Emotion, 18 (2), 109–128.

24. Orbell, J., Dawes, R., Schwartz-Shea, P. (1994): Trust, social categories and individuals: The case of gender. Motivation and Emotion, 18 (2), 109–128.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

25. Ross, L., Greene, D., House, P. (1977): The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13 (3), 279–301.

25. Ross, L., Greene, D., House, P. (1977): The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13 (3), 279–301.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

26. Samuelson, C. D., Watrous-Rodriguez, K. M. (2010): Group discussion and cooperation in social dilemmas: Does the medium matter? In: R. M. Kramer, A. E. Tenbrunsel, M. H. Bazerman (eds), Social Decision Making: Social Dilemmas, Social Values, and Ethical Judgments. New York, Routledge, 13–46.

26. Samuelson, C. D., Watrous-Rodriguez, K. M. (2010): Group discussion and cooperation in social dilemmas: Does the medium matter? In: R. M.Kramer, A. E.Tenbrunsel, M. H.Bazerman (eds), Social Decision Making: Social Dilemmas, Social Values, and Ethical Judgments. New York, Routledge, 13–46.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

27. Shelley, G. P., Page, M., Rivers, P., Yeagley, E., Kuhlman, D. M. (2010): Nonverbal communication and detection of individual differences in social value orientation. In: R. M. Kramer, A. E. Tenbrunsel, M. H. Bazerman (eds), Social Decision Making: Social Dilemmas, Social Values, and Ethical Judgments. New York, Routledge, 147–170.

27. Shelley, G. P., Page, M., Rivers, P., Yeagley, E., Kuhlman, D. M. (2010): Nonverbal communication and detection of individual differences in social value orientation. In: R. M.Kramer, A. E.Tenbrunsel, M. H.Bazerman (eds), Social Decision Making: Social Dilemmas, Social Values, and Ethical Judgments. New York, Routledge, 147–170.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

28. Thibaut, J., Walker, L. (1975): Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, Erlbaum.

28. Thibaut, J., Walker, L. (1975): Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, Erlbaum.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

29. Tyler, T. R. (1989): The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57 (5), 830–838.

29. Tyler, T. R. (1989): The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57 (5), 830–838.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

30. Van den Bos, K. (2001): Fairness heuristic theory: Assessing the information to which people are reacting has a pivotal role in understanding organizational justice. In: S. Gilliland, D. Steiner, D. Skarlicki (eds), Theoretical and Cultural Perspectives on Organizational Justice. Greenwich, Information Age Publishing, 63–84.

30. Van den Bos, K. (2001): Fairness heuristic theory: Assessing the information to which people are reacting has a pivotal role in understanding organizational justice. In: S.Gilliland, D.Steiner, D.Skarlicki (eds), Theoretical and Cultural Perspectives on Organizational Justice. Greenwich, Information Age Publishing, 63–84.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

31. Van den Bos, K., Wilke, H. A. M., Lind, E. A. (1998): When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75 (6), 1449–1458.

31. Van den Bos, K., Wilke, H. A. M., Lind, E. A. (1998): When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75 (6), 1449–1458.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

32. Van Dijk, E., Wit, A. P., Wilke, H. A. M., de Kwaadsteniet, E. W. (2010): On the importance of equality in social dilemmas. In: R. M. Kramer, A. E. Tenbrunsel, M. H. Bazerman (eds), Social Decision Making: Social Dilemmas, Social Values, and Ethical Judgments. New York, Routledge, 47–69.

32. Van Dijk, E., Wit, A. P., Wilke, H. A. M., de Kwaadsteniet, E. W. (2010): On the importance of equality in social dilemmas. In: R. M.Kramer, A. E.Tenbrunsel, M. H.Bazerman (eds), Social Decision Making: Social Dilemmas, Social Values, and Ethical Judgments. New York, Routledge, 47–69.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

33. Van Lange, P. A. M. (1992): Confidence in expectations: A test of the triangle hypothesis. European Journal of Personality, 6 (5), 371–379.

33. Van Lange, P. A. M. (1992): Confidence in expectations: A test of the triangle hypothesis. European Journal of Personality, 6 (5), 371–379.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

34. Van Lange, P. A. M., Agnew, C. R., Harinck, F., Steemers, G. E. M. (1997): From game theory to real life: How social value orientation affects willingness to sacrifice in ongoing close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73 (6), 1330–1344.

34. Van Lange, P. A. M., Agnew, C. R., Harinck, F., Steemers, G. E. M. (1997): From game theory to real life: How social value orientation affects willingness to sacrifice in ongoing close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73 (6), 1330–1344.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

35. Van Lange, P. A. M., Otten, W., De Bruin, E. M. N., Joireman, J. A. (1997): Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73 (4), 733–746.

35. Van Lange, P. A. M., Otten, W., De Bruin, E. M. N., Joireman, J. A. (1997): Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73 (4), 733–746.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

36. Van Prooijen, J.-W., De Cremer, D., van Beest, I., Stahl, T., van Dijke, M., Van Lange, P. A. M. (2008): The egocentric nature of procedural justice: Social value orientation as moderator of reactions to decision-making procedures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44 (5), 1303–1315.

36. Van Prooijen, J.-W., De Cremer, D., van Beest, I., Stahl, T., van Dijke, M., Van Lange, P. A. M. (2008): The egocentric nature of procedural justice: Social value orientation as moderator of reactions to decision-making procedures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44 (5), 1303–1315.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

37. Weber, J. M., Kopelman, S., Messick, D. M. (2004): A conceptual review of decision making in social dilemmas: Applying a logic of appropriateness. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8 (3), 281–307.

37. Weber, J. M., Kopelman, S., Messick, D. M. (2004): A conceptual review of decision making in social dilemmas: Applying a logic of appropriateness. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8 (3), 281–307.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

38. Yamagishi, T., Tanida, S., Mashima, R., Shimoma, E., Kanazawa, S. (2003): You can judge a book by its cover: Evidence that cheaters may look different from cooperators. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24 (4), 290–301.

38. Yamagishi, T., Tanida, S., Mashima, R., Shimoma, E., Kanazawa, S. (2003): You can judge a book by its cover: Evidence that cheaters may look different from cooperators. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24 (4), 290–301.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation