1. Allan, L. G. (1980): A note on measurement of contingency between two binary variables in judgement tasks. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15, 147–149.

1. Allan, L. G. (1980): A note on measurement of contingency between two binary variables in judgement tasks. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15, 147–149.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

2. Beckers, T., De Houwer, J., Pineńo, O., Miller, R. R. (2005): Outcome additivity and outcome maximality influence cue competition in human causal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 238–249.

2. Beckers, T., De Houwer, J., Pineńo, O., Miller, R. R. (2005): Outcome additivity and outcome maximality influence cue competition in human causal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 238–249.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

3. Cheng, P. W. (1997): From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review, 104, 367–405.

3. Cheng, P. W. (1997): From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review, 104, 367–405.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

4. Cheng, P. W., Novick, L. R. (1992): Covariation in natural causal induction. Psychological Review, 99, 365–382.

4. Cheng, P. W., Novick, L. R. (1992): Covariation in natural causal induction. Psychological Review, 99, 365–382.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

5. De Houwer, J. (2002): Forward blocking depends on retrospective inferences about the presence of the blocked cue during the elemental phase. Memory & Cognition, 30, 24–33.

5. De Houwer, J. (2002): Forward blocking depends on retrospective inferences about the presence of the blocked cue during the elemental phase. Memory & Cognition, 30, 24–33.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

6. Dickinson, A., Burke, J. (1996): Within-compound associations mediate the retrospective revaluation of causality judgements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49B, 60–80.

6. Dickinson, A., Burke, J. (1996): Within-compound associations mediate the retrospective revaluation of causality judgements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49B, 60–80.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

7. Kamin, L. J. (1968): “Attention-like” processes in classical conditioning. In: M. R. Jones (ed.), Miami Symposium on the Prediction of Behavior: Aversive Stimulation. Miami, FL: University of Miami Press, 9–31.

7. Kamin, L. J. (1968): “Attention-like” processes in classical conditioning. In: M. R.Jones (ed.), Miami Symposium on the Prediction of Behavior: Aversive Stimulation. Miami, FL: University of Miami Press, 9–31.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

8. Lovibond, P. F., Been, S., Mitchell, C. J., Bouton, M. E., Frohardt, R. (2003): Forward and backward blocking of causal judgment is enhanced by additivity of the effect magnitude. Memory & Cognition, 31, 133–142.

8. Lovibond, P. F., Been, S., Mitchell, C. J., Bouton, M. E., Frohardt, R. (2003): Forward and backward blocking of causal judgment is enhanced by additivity of the effect magnitude. Memory & Cognition, 31, 133–142.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

9. Mackintosh, N. J. (1975): A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276–298.

9. Mackintosh, N. J. (1975): A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276–298.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

10. Mitchell, C. J., Lovibond, P. F. (2002): Backward and forward blocking in human electrodermal conditioning: Blocking requires an assumption of outcome additivity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55B, 311–329.

10. Mitchell, C. J., Lovibond, P. F. (2002): Backward and forward blocking in human electrodermal conditioning: Blocking requires an assumption of outcome additivity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55B, 311–329.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

11. Mitchell, C. J., Lovibond, P. F., Condoleon, M. (2005): Evidence for deductive reasoning in blocking of causal judgments. Learning and Motivation, 36, 77–87.

11. Mitchell, C. J., Lovibond, P. F., Condoleon, M. (2005): Evidence for deductive reasoning in blocking of causal judgments. Learning and Motivation, 36, 77–87.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

12. Pearce, J. M., Hall, G. (1980): A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532–552.

12. Pearce, J. M., Hall, G. (1980): A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532–552.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

13. Pineńo, O., Miller, R. R. (2007): Comparing associative, statistical, and inferential reasoning accounts of human contingency learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 310–329.

13. Pineńo, O., Miller, R. R. (2007): Comparing associative, statistical, and inferential reasoning accounts of human contingency learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 310–329.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

14. Rescorla, R. A., Wagner, A. R. (1972): A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In: A. H. Black, W. F. Prokasy (eds), Classical Conditioning II: Current Research and Theory. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 64–99.

14. Rescorla, R. A., Wagner, A. R. (1972): A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In: A. H.Black, W. F.Prokasy (eds), Classical Conditioning II: Current Research and Theory. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 64–99.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

15. Shanks, D. R. (2007): Associationism and cognition: Human contingency learning at 25. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 291–309.

15. Shanks, D. R. (2007): Associationism and cognition: Human contingency learning at 25. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 291–309.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

16. Shanks, D. R., Holyoak, K. J., Medin, D. L. (1996): Causal Learning: The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 34, New York, Academic Press.

16. Shanks, D. R., Holyoak, K. J., Medin, D. L. (1996): Causal Learning: The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 34, New York, Academic Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

17. Spellman, B. A. (1996): Acting as intuitive scientists: Contingency judgments are made while controlling for alternative potential causes. Psychological Science, 7, 337–342.

17. Spellman, B. A. (1996): Acting as intuitive scientists: Contingency judgments are made while controlling for alternative potential causes. Psychological Science, 7, 337–342.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

18. Tarabulsy, G. M., Tessier, R., Kappas, A. (1996): Contingency detection and the contingent organization of behavior in interactions: Implications for socioemotional development in infancy. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 25–41.

18. Tarabulsy, G. M., Tessier, R., Kappas, A. (1996): Contingency detection and the contingent organization of behavior in interactions: Implications for socioemotional development in infancy. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 25–41.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

19. Tauzin Tibor (2010): A társas életmód hatása a mesterséges nyelvtan tanulásra embernél és állatoknál. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle, 65, 417–440.

19. Tauzin Tibor (2010): A társas életmód hatása a mesterséges nyelvtan tanulásra embernél és állatoknál. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle, 65, 417–440.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

20. Thorndike, E. L. (1931): Human Learning. New York, Century.

20. Thorndike, E. L. (1931): Human Learning. New York, Century.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

21. Van Hamme, L. J., Wasserman, E. A. (1994): Cue competition in causality judgments: The role of non-presentation of compound stimulus elements. Learning and Motivation, 25, 127–151.

21. Van Hamme, L. J., Wasserman, E. A. (1994): Cue competition in causality judgments: The role of non-presentation of compound stimulus elements. Learning and Motivation, 25, 127–151.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

22. Wagner, A. R. (1981): SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In: N. E. Spear, R. R. Miller (eds), Information Processing in Animals: Memory Mechanisms. Hellsdale, NJ: Lawrence Elbaum Associates, Inc., 5–47.

22. Wagner, A. R. (1981): SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In: N. E.Spear, R. R.Miller (eds), Information Processing in Animals: Memory Mechanisms. Hellsdale, NJ: Lawrence Elbaum Associates, Inc., 5–47.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

23. Wasserman, E. A. (1990): Detecting response–outcome relations: Toward an understanding of the causal texture of the environment. In: G. H. Bower (ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. San Diego, CA, Academic Press, 27–82.

23. Wasserman, E. A. (1990): Detecting response–outcome relations: Toward an understanding of the causal texture of the environment. In: G. H.Bower (ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. San Diego, CA, Academic Press, 27–82.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

24. Watson, J. S. (1972): Smiling, cooing, and “the game”. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 18, 323–339.

24. Watson, J. S. (1972): Smiling, cooing, and “the game”. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 18, 323–339.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

25. Watson, J. S. (1979): Perception of contingency as a determinant of social responsiveness. In: E. Thoman (ed.), The Origins of Social Responsiveness. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum, 33–64.

25. Watson, J. S. (1979): Perception of contingency as a determinant of social responsiveness. In: E.Thoman (ed.), The Origins of Social Responsiveness. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum, 33–64.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation