1. APA, & AERA. (1999): Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association.

1. APA, & AERA. (1999): Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

2. Barak, A., English, N. (2002): Prospects and limitations of psychological testing on the Internet. Using the Internet as a Research Tool for Social Work and Human Services, 19 (2–3), 65.

2. Barak, A., English, N. (2002): Prospects and limitations of psychological testing on the Internet. Using the Internet as a Research Tool for Social Work and Human Services, 19 (2–3), 65.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

3. Barnette, J. J. (2005): ScoreRel CI: An Excel program for computing confidence intervals for commonly used score reliability coefficients. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65 (6), 980–983.

3. Barnette, J. J. (2005): ScoreRel CI: An Excel program for computing confidence intervals for commonly used score reliability coefficients. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65 (6), 980–983.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

4. Brand, C. R. (1994): Open to experience—closed to intelligence: Why the ‘Big Five'are really the ‘Comprehensive Six’. European Journal of Personality, 8 (4), 299–310.

4. Brand, C. R. (1994): Open to experience—closed to intelligence: Why the ‘Big Five'are really the ‘Comprehensive Six’. European Journal of Personality, 8 (4), 299–310.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

5. Browne, M. V., Cudeck, R. (1993): Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: K. A. Bollen, S. J. Long (eds), Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 136–162.

5. Browne, M. V., Cudeck, R. (1993): Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: K. A.Bollen, S. J.Long (eds), Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 136–162.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

6. Buckley, N. (2008): National Character. Paper presented at the The 6th Conference of the International Test Commission, Liverpool, UK. http://abstracts.envisialearning.com/72-abstractFile.pdf (Letöltve: 2012. okt.).

6. Buckley, N. (2008): National Character. Paper presented at the The 6th Conference of the International Test Commission, Liverpool, UK. http://abstracts.envisialearning.com/72-abstractFile.pdf (Letöltve: 2012. okt.).)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

7. Buckley, N., Williams, R. (2002): Testing on the web – Response patterns and image management. Selection & Development Review, 18, 3–8.

7. Buckley, N., Williams, R. (2002): Testing on the web – Response patterns and image management. Selection & Development Review, 18, 3–8.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

8. Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., Perugini, M. (1993): The ‘Big Five Questionnaire’: A new questionnaire to assess the Five Factor Model. Personality and Individual Differences, 15 (3), 281–288.

8. Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., Perugini, M. (1993): The ‘Big Five Questionnaire’: A new questionnaire to assess the Five Factor Model. Personality and Individual Differences, 15 (3), 281–288.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

9. Caprara, G. V., Perugini, M. (1994): Personality described by adjectives: The generalizability of the Big Five to the Italian lexical context. European Journal of Personality, 8 (5), 357–369.

9. Caprara, G. V., Perugini, M. (1994): Personality described by adjectives: The generalizability of the Big Five to the Italian lexical context. European Journal of Personality, 8 (5), 357–369.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

10. Carstairs, J., Myors, B. (2009): Internet testing: A natural experiment reveals test score inflation on a high-stakes, unproctored cognitive test. Computers in Human Behavior, 25 (3), 738–742.

10. Carstairs, J., Myors, B. (2009): Internet testing: A natural experiment reveals test score inflation on a high-stakes, unproctored cognitive test. Computers in Human Behavior, 25 (3), 738–742.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

11. Costa, P. T., McCrae, R. R. (1992): Professional Manual: Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

11. Costa, P. T., McCrae, R. R. (1992): Professional Manual: Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

12. Costa, P. T., McCrae, R. R. (1995): Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64 (1), 21–50.

12. Costa, P. T., McCrae, R. R. (1995): Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64 (1), 21–50.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

13. De Raad, B., Perugini, M., Szirmák, Z. (1998): In Pursuit of a cross-lingual references structure of personality traits: Comparisons among five languages. European Journal of Personality, 11 (3), 167–185.

13. De Raad, B., Perugini, M., Szirmák,Z. (1998): In Pursuit of a cross-lingual references structure of personality traits: Comparisons among five languages. European Journal of Personality, 11 (3), 167–185.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

14. Feldt, L. S. (1969): A test of the hypothesis that cronbach's alpha or kuder-richardson coefficent twenty is the same for two tests. Psychometrika, 34 (3), 363–373.

14. Feldt, L. S. (1969): A test of the hypothesis that cronbach's alpha or kuder-richardson coefficent twenty is the same for two tests. Psychometrika, 34 (3), 363–373.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

15. Horváth G. (1997): A modern tesztmodellek alkalmazása. Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó.

15. Horváth G. (1997): A modern tesztmodellek alkalmazása. Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

16. Hu, L., Bentler, P. M. (1999): Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6 (1), 1–55.

16. Hu, L., Bentler, P. M. (1999): Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6 (1), 1–55.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

17. ITC (2010): International Test Commission guidelines for translating and adapting tests. http://www.intestcom.org/Guidelines/Adapting+Tests.php (Letöltve: 2012. okt.).

17. ITC (2010): International Test Commission guidelines for translating and adapting tests. http://www.intestcom.org/Guidelines/Adapting+Tests.php (Letöltve: 2012. okt.).)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

18. John, O. P., Srivastava, S. (1999): The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 2, 102–138.

18. John, O. P., Srivastava, S. (1999): The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 2, 102–138.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

19. Kline, R. B. (2010): Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, Third Edition. New York, Guilford Press.

19. Kline, R. B. (2010): Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, Third Edition. New York, Guilford Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

20. Marsh, H. W., Hocevar, D. (1985): Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First-and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97 (3), 562.

20. Marsh, H. W., Hocevar, D. (1985): Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First-and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97 (3), 562.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

21. McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T. (2004): A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 36 (3), 587–596.

21. McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T. (2004): A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 36 (3), 587–596.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

22. McCrae, R. R., Zonderman, A. B., Costa, P. T., Bond, M. H., Paunonen, S. V. (1996): Evaluating replicability of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70 (3), 552.

22. McCrae, R. R., Zonderman, A. B., Costa, P. T., Bond, M. H., Paunonen, S. V. (1996): Evaluating replicability of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70 (3), 552.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

23. Mead, A. D., Drasgow, F. (1993): Equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil cognitive ability tests: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114 (3), 449.

23. Mead, A. D., Drasgow, F. (1993): Equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil cognitive ability tests: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114 (3), 449.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

24. Meade, A. W., Michels, L. C., Lautenschlager, G. J. (2007): Are internet and paper-and-pencil personality tests truly comparable?: An experimental design measurement invariance study. Organizational Research Methods, 10 (2), 322–345.

24. Meade, A. W., Michels, L. C., Lautenschlager, G. J. (2007): Are internet and paper-and-pencil personality tests truly comparable?: An experimental design measurement invariance study. Organizational Research Methods, 10 (2), 322–345.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

25. Mirnics Zsuzsanna (2006): A személyiség építőkövei. Típus-, vonás-és biológiai elméletek. Budapest, Bölcsész Konzorcium.

25. Mirnics Zsuzsanna (2006): A személyiség építőkövei. Típus-, vonás-és biológiai elméletek. Budapest, Bölcsész Konzorcium.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

26. Naus, M. J., Philipp, L. M., Samsi, M. (2009): From paper to pixels: A comparison of paper and computer formats in psychological assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 25 (1), 1–7.

26. Naus, M. J., Philipp, L. M., Samsi, M. (2009): From paper to pixels: A comparison of paper and computer formats in psychological assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 25 (1), 1–7.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

27. Ostendorf, F., Angleitner, A. (1994): Reflections on different labels for Factor V. European Journal of Personality, 8 (4), 341–349.

27. Ostendorf, F., Angleitner, A. (1994): Reflections on different labels for Factor V. European Journal of Personality, 8 (4), 341–349.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

28. Perugini, M., Ercolani, A. P. (1998): Validity of the Five Factor Personality Inventory (FFPI): An investigation in Italy. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 14 (3), 234.

28. Perugini, M., Ercolani, A. P. (1998): Validity of the Five Factor Personality Inventory (FFPI): An investigation in Italy. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 14 (3), 234.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

29. Ployhart, R. E., Weekley, J. A., Holtz, B. C., Kemp, C. (2003): Web-based and paper-and-pencil testing of applicants in a proctored setting: Are personality, biodata, and situational judgment tests comparable? Personnel Psychology, 56 (3), 733–752.

29. Ployhart, R. E., Weekley, J. A., Holtz, B. C., Kemp, C. (2003): Web-based and paper-and-pencil testing of applicants in a proctored setting: Are personality, biodata, and situational judgment tests comparable?Personnel Psychology, 56 (3), 733–752.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

30. Rawling, K., Reid, J. (2006): British Psychological Society – Psychological Testing Centre Test Reviews: Facet5. (http://psychtesting.org.uk). http://envisiatools.com/products/Personality-test/Facet5/Facet5Resources/BPSReview.pdf (Letöltés: 2012. okt.).

30. Rawling, K., Reid, J. (2006): British Psychological Society – Psychological Testing Centre Test Reviews: Facet5. (http://psychtesting.org.uk). http://envisiatools.com/products/Personality-test/Facet5/Facet5Resources/BPSReview.pdf (Letöltés: 2012. okt.).)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

31. Richman, W. L., Kiesler, S., Weisband, S., Drasgow, F. (1999): A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84 (5), 754–775.

31. Richman, W. L., Kiesler, S., Weisband, S., Drasgow, F. (1999): A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84 (5), 754–775.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

32. Rózsa Sándor , Kő Natasa, Oláh Attila (2006): Rekonstruálható-e a Big Five a hazai mintán? A Carparaféle “Big Five Kérdőív” (BFQ) felnőtt változatának hazai adaptációja és nemzetközi összehasonlító elemzése. Pszichológia, 26 (1), 57–76.

32. Rózsa Sándor , KőNatasa, OláhAttila (2006): Rekonstruálható-e a Big Five a hazai mintán? A Carparaféle “Big Five Kérdőív” (BFQ) felnőtt változatának hazai adaptációja és nemzetközi összehasonlító elemzése. Pszichológia, 26 (1), 57–76.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

33. Salgado, J. F., Anderson, N., Moscoso, S., Bertua, C., De Fruyt, F., Rolland, J. P. (2003): A meta-analytic study of general mental ability validity for different occupations in the European community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (6), 1068.

33. Salgado, J. F., Anderson, N., Moscoso, S., Bertua, C., De Fruyt, F., Rolland, J. P. (2003): A meta-analytic study of general mental ability validity for different occupations in the European community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (6), 1068.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

34. Sampson, J. J. P. (2000): Using the Internet to enhance testing in counseling. Journal of Counseling & Development, 78 (3), 348.

34. Sampson, J. J. P. (2000): Using the Internet to enhance testing in counseling. Journal of Counseling & Development, 78 (3), 348.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

35. Saucier, G. (1992): Openness versus intellect: Much ado about nothing? European Journal of Personality, 6 (5), 381–386. Saucier, G. (1994): Trapnell versus the lexical factor: More ado about nothing? European Journal of Personality, 8 (4), 291–298.

35. Saucier, G. (1992): Openness versus intellect: Much ado about nothing?European Journal of Personality, 6 (5), 381–386. Saucier, G. (1994): Trapnell versus the lexical factor: More ado about nothing? European Journal of Personality, 8 (4), 291–298.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

36. Schmidt, W. C. (1997): World-Wide Web survey research: Benefits, potential problems, and solutions. Behavior Research Methods, 29 (2), 274–279.

36. Schmidt, W. C. (1997): World-Wide Web survey research: Benefits, potential problems, and solutions. Behavior Research Methods, 29 (2), 274–279.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

37. Soto, C. J., John, O. P. (2009): Ten facet scales for the Big Five Inventory: Convergence with NEO PI-R facets, self-peer agreement, and discriminant validity. Journal of Research in Personality, 43 (1), 84–90.

37. Soto, C. J., John, O. P. (2009): Ten facet scales for the Big Five Inventory: Convergence with NEO PI-R facets, self-peer agreement, and discriminant validity. Journal of Research in Personality, 43 (1), 84–90.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

38. Szirmák Zsófia , De Raad, B. (1994a): Személyiségtaxonómia a magyar nyelv személyleíró szókincse. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle, 50 (1–2), 39–65. Szirmák, Zs., De Raad, B. (1994b): Taxonomy and structure of Hungarian personality traits. European Journal of Personality, 8 (2), 95–117.

38. Szirmák Zsófia , De Raad, B. (1994a): Személyiségtaxonómia a magyar nyelv személyleíró szókincse. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle, 50 (1–2), 39–65. Szirmák, Zs., De Raad, B. (1994b): Taxonomy and structure of Hungarian personality traits. European Journal of Personality, 8 (2), 95–117.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

39. Szirmák, Zs., Nagy, J. (2002): The Hungarian adaptation of the NEO Personality Inventory, Revised, Form S: Progress report on the reliability and validity of the first translation (NEOPIR-H1) and the item corrections (NEOPIR-H2) for the final version. Unpublished manuscript, Free University of Berlin, Germany.

39. Szirmák, Zs., Nagy, J. (2002): The Hungarian adaptation of the NEO Personality Inventory, Revised, Form S: Progress report on the reliability and validity of the first translation (NEOPIR-H1) and the item corrections (NEOPIR-H2) for the final version. Unpublished manuscript, Free University of Berlin, Germany.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

40. Tóth István György (2009): Bizalomhiány, normazavarok, igazságtalanságérzet és paternalizmus a magyar társadalom értékszerkezetében. A gazdasági felemelkedés társadalmi-kulturális feltételei című kutatás zárójelentése. Budapest, TÁRKI Társadalomkutatási Intézet Zrt.

40. Tóth István György (2009): Bizalomhiány, normazavarok, igazságtalanságérzet és paternalizmus a magyar társadalom értékszerkezetében. A gazdasági felemelkedés társadalmi-kulturális feltételei című kutatás zárójelentése. Budapest, TÁRKI Társadalomkutatási Intézet Zrt.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation