Authors:
R. van Sluijs DSM Research B.V., PAC-AN/EA P.O. Box 18 6160 MD Geleen The Netherlands

Search for other papers by R. van Sluijs in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
D. Bossus DSM Research B.V., PAC-AN/EA P.O. Box 18 6160 MD Geleen The Netherlands

Search for other papers by D. Bossus in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M. Blaauw Delft University of Technology Interfaculty Reactor Institute Mekelweg 15 2629 JB Delft The Netherlands

Search for other papers by M. Blaauw in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
G. Kennedy Ecole Polytechnique P.O. Box 6079 Downtown Montreal Quebec H3C 3A7 Canada

Search for other papers by G. Kennedy in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
A. De Wispelaere Gent University Institute for Nuclear Sciences Proeftuinstraat 86 B-9000 Gent Belgium

Search for other papers by A. De Wispelaere in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
S. van Lierde

Search for other papers by S. van Lierde in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
F. De Corte Gent University Institute for Nuclear Sciences Proeftuinstraat 86 B-9000 Gent Belgium

Search for other papers by F. De Corte in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract  

True-coincidence summing correction is an essential element in k0-based NAA1 and becomes important when samples are counted with a high efficiency detector. This may be the case where large detectors are used or where samples are counted in or in the vicinity of the detector in order to achieve low detection limits in conjunction with low-flux reactors. In some laboratories coincidence correction is accomplished by calculating the coincidence correction factors. Since experimental validation of the calculations will reveal only the most significant errors and is a laborious task due to the high number of radionuclides involved, three laboratories decided to compare their calculated coincidence factors. Each laboratory uses a different software package. A comparative performance analysis was made of COINCALC developed at the INW of the University of Gent (implemented in SOLCOI by DSM Research), the software of the IRI, University of Delft, the Netherlands, and the software of the Ecole Polytechnique, Montreal, Canada. The overall approach, data and algorithms were chosen independently by each institute as the software was being developed and, so, the comparison has yielded a number of interesting conclusions. A follow-up investigation of the discrepancies found will probably allow the performance of each program to be improved.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

To see the editorial board, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Manuscript Submission: HERE

For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Journal of Radionalytical and Nuclear Chemistry
Language English
Size A4
Year of
Foundation
1968
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
12
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0236-5731 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2780 (Online)