Authors:
L. Al-Attar University of Salford Cockcroft Building, School of Sciences Salford M5 4WT UK

Search for other papers by L. Al-Attar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
A. Dyer University of Salford Cockcroft Building, School of Sciences Salford M5 4WT UK

Search for other papers by A. Dyer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
R. Blackburn University of Salford Cockcroft Building, School of Sciences Salford M5 4WT UK

Search for other papers by R. Blackburn in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract  

Two samples of the microporous titanosilicate ETS-10 synthesised by different preparation procedures were compared for their ability to take up uranium from aqueous solutions using a batch-type technique. The ETS-10 samples were synthesised using either TiO2 or TiCl3 as a titanium source. The uptake of uranium on the materials was compared by determining the distribution coefficient and percentage sorption as a function of contact time, uranium concentration, and sorbent concentration. It was found that the difference in the synthesis procedures of the materials had a significant influence on the uptake of uranium.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

To see the editorial board, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Manuscript Submission: HERE

For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Journal of Radionalytical and Nuclear Chemistry
Language English
Size A4
Year of
Foundation
1968
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
12
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0236-5731 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2780 (Online)