Authors:
D. Upp Perkin Elmer Instruments, Inc., Ortec 801 South Illinois Avenue Oak Ridge TN 37831 USA

Search for other papers by D. Upp in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
R. Keyser Perkin Elmer Instruments, Inc., Ortec 801 South Illinois Avenue Oak Ridge TN 37831 USA

Search for other papers by R. Keyser in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
D. Gedcke Perkin Elmer Instruments, Inc., Ortec 801 South Illinois Avenue Oak Ridge TN 37831 USA

Search for other papers by D. Gedcke in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
T. Twomey Perkin Elmer Instruments, Inc., Ortec 801 South Illinois Avenue Oak Ridge TN 37831 USA

Search for other papers by T. Twomey in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
R. Bingham Perkin Elmer Instruments, Inc., Ortec 801 South Illinois Avenue Oak Ridge TN 37831 USA

Search for other papers by R. Bingham in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract  

All nuclear spectroscopy systems, whether measuring charged particles, X-rays, or gamma-rays, exhibit dead time losses during the counting process due to pulse processing in the electronics. Several techniques have been employed in an effort to reduce the effects of dead time losses on a spectroscopy system including live time clocks and loss-free counting modules. Live time extension techniques give accurate results when measuring samples in which the activity remains roughly constant during the measuring process (i.e., the dead time does not change significantly during a single measurement period). The loss-free counting method of correcting for dead time losses, as introduced by HARMS and improved by WESTPHAL (US Patent No. 4,476,384) give better results than live time extension techniques when the counting rate changes significantly during the measurement. However, loss-free counting methods are limited by the fact that an estimation of the uncertainty associated with the spectral counts can not be easily determined, because the corrected data no longer obeys Poisson statistics. Therefore, accurate analysis of the spectral data including the uncertainty calculations is difficult to achieve. The Ortec® DSPECPLUS implements an improved zero dead time method that accurately predicts the uncertainty from counting statistics and overcomes the limitations of previous loss-free counting methods. The uncertainty in the dead-time corrected spectrum is calculated and stored with the spectral data (Patent Pending). The GammaVision-32® analysis algorithm has been improved to propagate this uncertainty through the activity calculation. Two experiments are set up to verify these innovations. The experiments show that the new method gives the same reported activity and associated uncertainties as the well-proven Gedcke-Hale live time clock. It is thus shown that over a wide range of dead times the new ZDT method tracks the true counting rate as if it had zero dead time, and yields an accurate estimation of the statistical uncertainty in the reported counts.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

To see the editorial board, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Manuscript Submission: HERE

For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Journal of Radionalytical and Nuclear Chemistry
Language English
Size A4
Year of
Foundation
1968
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
12
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0236-5731 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2780 (Online)