Authors:
J. Corcho Alvarado Institute of Radiation Physics, University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Rue du Grand-Pré 1, 1007 Lausanne, Switzerland

Search for other papers by J. Corcho Alvarado in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Y. Nedjadi Institute of Radiation Physics, University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Rue du Grand-Pré 1, 1007 Lausanne, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Y. Nedjadi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
F. Bochud Institute of Radiation Physics, University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Rue du Grand-Pré 1, 1007 Lausanne, Switzerland

Search for other papers by F. Bochud in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract  

Liquid scintillation counting (LSC) is one of the most widely used methods for determining the activity of 241Pu. One of the main challenges of this counting method is the efficiency calibration of the system for the low beta energies of 241Pu (Emax = 20.8 keV). In this paper we compare the two most frequently used methods, the CIEMAT/NIST efficiency tracing (CNET) method and the experimental quench correction curve method. Both methods proved to be reliable, and agree within their uncertainties, for the expected quenching conditions of the sources.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

To see the editorial board, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Manuscript Submission: HERE

For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Journal of Radionalytical and Nuclear Chemistry
Language English
Size A4
Year of
Foundation
1968
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
12
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0236-5731 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2780 (Online)