Microcrystalline cellulose-filled polypropylene (PP) composites and cellulose nanofiber-filled composites were prepared by melt blending. The compounded material was used to evaluate dispersion of cellulose fillers in the polypropylene matrix. Thermogravimetric analysis (TG) and mechanical testing were conducted on composites blended multiple times and the results were compared with single batch melt blended composites. The residual mass, tensile strength, and coefficient of variance values were used to evaluate dispersion of the microcrystalline cellulose fillers in the PP matrix. The potential of using TG to evaluate cellulose nanofiber-filled thermoplastic polymers was also investigated and it was found that the value and variability of residual mass after TG measurements can be a criterion for describing filler dispersion. A probabilistic approach is presented to evaluate the residual mass and tensile strength distribution, and the correlation between those two properties. Both the multiple melt blending and single batch composites manufactured with increased blending times showed improved filler dispersion in terms of variation and reliability of mechanical properties. The relationship between cellulose nanofiber loading and residual mass was in good agreement with the rule of mixtures. In this article, the authors propose to use a novel method for dispersion evaluation of natural fillers in a polymer matrix using TG residual mass analysis. This method can be used along with other techniques such as scanning electron microscope (SEM), transmission electron microscope (TEM), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) for filler dispersion evaluation in thermoplastic composites.
1. Siro, I, Plackett., D. Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose 2010 17 3 459–494 .
2. Eichhorn, SJ, Dufresne, A, Aranguren, M, Marcovich, NE, Capadona, JR, Rowan, SJ, Weder, C, Thielemans, W, Roman, M, Renneckar, S, Gindl, W, Veigel, S, Keckes, J, Yano, H, Abe, K, Nogi, M, Nakagaito, AN, Mangalam, A, Simonsen, J, Benight, AS, Bismarck, A, Berglund, LA, Peijs, T. Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 2010 45 1 1–33 .
3. Mathew, AP, Oksman, K, Sain, M. Mechanical properties of biodegradable composites from poly lactic acid (PLA) and microcrystalline cellulose (MCC). J Appl Polym Sci 2005 97 5 2014–2025 .
4. Petersson, L, Oksman, K. Biopolymer based nanocomposites: comparing layered silicates and microcrystalline cellulose as nanoreinforcement. Compos Sci Technol 2006 66 13 2187–2196 .
5. Kumar, AP, Singh, RP. Novel hybrid of clay, cellulose, and thermoplastics. I. Preparation and characterization of composites of ethylene–propylene copolymer. J Appl Polym Sci 2007 104 4 2672–2682 .
6. Gu, R, Kokta, BV. Effect of independent variables on mechanical properties and maximization of aspen–polypropylene composites. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 2008 21 1 27–50 .
7. Yang, HS, Gardner, DJ, Kim, HJ. Viscoelastic and thermal analysis of lignocellulosic material filled polypropylene bio-composites. J Therm Anal Calorim 2009 98 2 553–558 .
8. Mi, Y, Chen, X, Guo, Q. Bamboo fiber-reinforced polypropylene composites: crystallization and interfacial morphology. J Appl Polym Sci 1997 64 7 1267–1273 .
9. Zugenmaier, P. Materials of cellulose derivatives and fiber-reinforced cellulose–polypropylene composites: characterization and application. Pure Appl Chem. 2006;78 10 1843–1855 .
10. Alemdar, A, Sain, M. Biocomposites from wheat straw nanofibers: morphology, thermal and mechanical properties. Compos Sci Technol 2008 68 2 557–565 .
11. Lee, SY, Yang, HS, Kim, HJ, Jeong, CS, Lim, BS, Lee, JN. Creep behavior and manufacturing parameters of wood flour filled polypropylene composites. Compos Struct 2004 65 3–4 459–469 .
12. Yang, HS, Kim, HJ, Son, J, Park, HJ, Lee, BJ, Hwang, TS. Rice-husk flour filled polypropylene composites; mechanical and morphological study. Compos Struct 2004 63 3–4 305–312 .
13. Yang, HS, Wolcott, MP, Kim, HS, Kim, HJ. Thermal properties of lignocellulosic filler-thermoplastic polymer bio-composites. J Therm Anal Calorim 2005 82 1 157–160 .
14. Yang, HS, Kim, HJ, Park, HJ, Lee, BJ, Hwang, TS. Water absorption behavior and mechanical properties of lignocellulosic filler-polyolefin bio-composites. Compos Struct 2006 72 4 429–437 .
15. Yang, HS, Wolcott, MP, Kim, HS, Kim, S, Kim, HJ. Properties of lignocellulosic material filled polypropylene bio-composites made with different manufacturing processes. Polym Testing 2006 25 5 668–676 .
16. Yang, HS, Kim, HJ, Park, HJ, Lee, BJ, Hwang, TS. Effect of compatibilizing agents on rice-husk flour reinforced polypropylene composites. Compos Struct 2007 77 1 45–55 .
17. Jana, SC, Jain, S. Dispersion of nanofillers in high performance polymers using reactive solvents as processing aids. Polymer 2001 42 16 6897–6905 .
18. Manias, E, Touny, A, Wu, L, Strawhecker, K, Lu, B, Chung, TC. Polypropylene/montmorillonite nanocomposites. review of the synthetic routes and materials properties. Chem Mater 2001 13 10 3516–3523 .
19. Sakin, R, Ay, I. Statistical analysis of bending fatigue life data using Weibull distribution in glass-fiber reinforced polyester composites. Mater Des 2008 29 6 1170–1181 .
20. Tanimoto, T, Amijima, S, Matsuoka, T Fatigue life estimation of laminated GRP materials under various random load patterns ICCM-V San Diego 1985 199–210.
21. Long MW , Narciso JD. Probabilistic design methodology for composite aircraft structures national technical information service. 1999. Springfield, Virginia, 22161. http://aar400.tc.faa.gov/acc/accompdocs/99-2.pdf.
22. Khashaba, UA. Fatigue and reliability analysis of unidirectional GFRP composites under rotating bending loads. J Compos Mater. 2003;37 4 317–331 .
23. Tanimoto T , Amijima S, Ishikawa H. A reliability analysis approach to fatigue life dispersion of laminated glass fiber composite materials. In: ICM 3, Vol. 3, Cambridge, England; 1979. p. 207–16.
24. Qiao, P, Yang, M. Fatigue life prediction of pultruded E-glass/polyurethane composites. J Compos Mater 2006 40 9 815–837 .