Authors:
I. HartmannDeutsche Sporthochschule Köln Institut für Sportsoziologie und Friezeitpädagogik Carl-Diem-Weg 6 D-5000 Köln 41 (FRG) Carl-Diem-Weg 6 D-5000 Köln 41 (FRG)

Search for other papers by I. Hartmann in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
F. NeidhardtWissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung Reichpietschufer 50 D-1000 Berlin 30 (FRG) Reichpietschufer 50 D-1000 Berlin 30 (FRG)

Search for other papers by F. Neidhardt in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract  

Results of a study designed to investigate the peer review system at theDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft are presented. 242 applications for grants and 639 corresponding reviews were analysed to explore criteria actually used by peers in assessing the quality of proposals. The findings show a wide range of criteria used, an uneven distribution of positive and negative evaluation along these criteria, high inter-referee agreement and different degrees of impact of the evaluations on the overall recommendation.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • Top

To see the editorial board, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Manuscript submission: http://www.editorialmanager.com/scim/

For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Scientometrics
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1978
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
12
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0138-9130 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2861 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Apr 2022 0 1 2
May 2022 0 0 0
Jun 2022 0 0 0
Jul 2022 0 0 0
Aug 2022 0 0 0
Sep 2022 0 0 0
Oct 2022 0 0 0