View More View Less
  • 1 ETRI- IT Technology Management Research Institute, Yusung, Taejon, Korea
  • | 2 STEPI, Cheongryang, Seoul, Korea
Restricted access

This paper focuses on the measurement of scientific and technological performance of Korea and Taiwan in what has been the most successful technology catch-up within developing economies context. The performance measures are based on the publication data for scientific knowledge production and patent data for technological capabilities. In addition, this analysis also reveals on the features of innovation system of these two countries, focusing on the linkages between public and private sector in the scientific and technological knowledge creation. By examining the scientific and technological performance and the changing structure of innovation system, it provides empirical evidence on the positive interaction between scientific and technological activities.

  • BIDS-ISI Database (1997), Institute of Science Information, University of Sussex, BIDS-ISI Database, UK, US.

  • Choung, J.-Y. 1998 Patterns of Innovation in Korea and Taiwan IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management 45 357365.

  • Freeman, C. (1988), Japan: a new national system of innovation, Pinter Publishers.

  • Katz, J.S. Hicks, D. 1996 A Systematic view of British Science Scientometrics 35 133154.

  • KIPO 1996 Annual Report of 1995 Korean Industrial Property Office(KIPO) Seoul, Korea.

  • KITA 1994 Directory of Research Institutes Korea Industrial Technology Association (KITA) Korea.

  • Kompass (1993), Kompass Korea, V.1/V.2, Seoul.

  • KOSEF (1997), Report on SRC/ERC.

  • Lundvall, A. (1988), Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to the national systems of innovation, In: Dosi et al. (Eds), Technical Change and Economic Theory.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NBS 1996 Yearbook of Patent and Trademark National Bureau of Standards(NBS), Ministry of Economic Affairs Taipei, ROC.

  • Nelson, R. (1993), National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Study, OUP.

  • NSF 1996 Science and Engineering Indicators National Science Foundations(NSF) Washington.

  • Pavitt, K. Patel, P. 1988 The international distribution and determinants of technological activities Oxford Review of Economic Policy 4 3555.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • USPTO 1996 Patents: BIB, CLASS, ASSIST, PASN U.S. Department of Commerce, Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Washington.

  • USPTO 1999 General Statistics Report, Technology Assessment & Forecast Program Report Series U.S. Department of Commerce, Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Washington.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WTO 1998 WTO Focus Newsletter World Trade Organization (WTO) Geneva.

Manuscript submission: http://www.editorialmanager.com/scim/

  • Impact Factor (2019): 2.867
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2019): 1.210
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2019): 106
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Computer Science Apllications
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Library and Information Sciences
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Impact Factor (2018): 2.770
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2018): 1.113
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2018): 95
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q1 Library and Information Sciences
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q1 Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer

Scientometrics
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1978
Volumes
per Year
4
Issues
per Year
12
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0138-9130 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2861 (Online)