View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Philosophy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
Restricted access

This paper first describes the recent development that scientists and engineers of many disciplines, countries, and institutions increasingly engage in nanoscale research at breathtaking speed. By co-author analysis of over 600 papers published in “nano journals” in 2002 and 2003, I investigate if this apparent concurrence is accompanied by new forms and degrees of multi- and interdisciplinarity as well as of institutional and geographic research collaboration. Based on a new visualization method, patterns of research collaboration are analyzed and compared with those of classical disciplinary research. I argue that current nanoscale research reveals no particular patterns and degrees of interdisciplinarity and that its apparent multidisciplinarity consists of different largely mono-disciplinary fields which are rather unrelated to each other and which hardly share more than the prefix “nano”.

  • Bensaude-Vincent, B. 2001 The construction of a discipline: Materials science in the United States Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 31 223248.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BMBF, Nanotechnologie in Deutschland: Standortbestimmung, 2002.

  • Braun, T. Schubert, A. Zsindely, S. 1997 Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance Scientometrics 38 2 321325.

  • Budworth, D. W. 1996 Overview of Activities on Nanotechnology and Related Technology Institute for Prospective Technological Studies Seville.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gibbons, M. Limoges, C. Nowotny, H. Schwartzman, S. Scott, P. Trow, P. 1994 The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies Sage Publications London.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Katz, J. S. Hicks, D. 1995 The classification of interdisciplinary journals: A new approach Koenig, M. E. D. Bookstein, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics Learned Information Melford 245254.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Katz, J. S. Martin, B. R. 1997 What is research collaboration? Research Policy 26 118.

  • Klein, J. T. 1990 Interdisciplinarity. History, Theory & Practice Wayne State University Press Detroit.

  • Khosla, R. P. (2002), Nanotechnology in Japan, National Science Foundation, Tokyo Regional Office, Special Scientific Report #02-07, June 12.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Malsch, I. 1997 The Importance of Interdisciplinary Approaches: The Case of Nanotechnology Institute for Prospective Technological Studies Seville.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Malsch, I. 1997 Nanotechnology in Europe: Experts. Perceptions and Scientific Relations Between Sub-Areas Institute for Prospective Technological Studies Seville.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Malsch, I. 1999 Nanotechnology in Europe: scientific trends and organizational dynamics Nanotechnology 10 17.

  • Meyer, M. 2000 Patent citations in a novel field of technology: What can they tell about interactions of emerging communities of science and technology? Scientometrics 48 151178.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meyer, M. 2001 Patent citations in a novel field of technology: An exploration of nano-science and nanotechnology Scientometrics 51 163183.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meyer, M. Persson, O. 1998 Nanotechnology — interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application Scientometrics 42 2 195205.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meyer, M., Persson, O., Power, Y. (2001), Nanotechnology Expert Group and Eurotech Data, Mapping Excellence in Nanotechnologies. Preparatory Study for the European Commission, DG Research, [http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/era/pdf/nanoexpertgroupreport.pdf].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Morillo, F. Bordons, M. GÓmez, I. 2001 An appoach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators Scientometrics 51 203222.

  • National Research Council 2002 Small Wonders, Endless Frontiers: A Review of the National Nanotechnology Initiative National Academy Press Washington, D.C. 12.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • National Science And Technology Council (NSTC) (2000), National Nanotechnology Initiative: The Initiative and its Implementation Plan. Washington, D.C., July, p. 13 [http://www.nano.gov/nni2.pdf].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Porter, A. L. Chubin, D. E. 1985 An indicator of cross-disciplinary research Scientometrics 8 161176.

  • Qin, J. Lancaster, F. W. Allen, B. 1997 Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences Journal of the American Society for Information Science 48 893916.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Qiu, L. 1992 A study of interdisciplinary research collaboration Research Evaluation 2 169175.

  • Roco, M. C. Bainbridge, W. S. (eds.) 2002 Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and the Cognitive Science National Science Foundation Arlington, VA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schummer, J. (2003), Chemical versus biological explanation: Interdisciplinarity and reductionism in the 19th-century life sciences, In: Earley, J. E. (Ed.), Chemical Explanation: Characteristics, Development, Autonomy, New York (Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 988), pp. 269281.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schummer, J., Interdisciplinary issues in nanoscale research, In: Baird, D., Nordmann, A., Schummer, J. (Eds), Discovering the Nanoscale, book in preparation; electronic prepublication at http://www.cla.sc.edu/cpecs/nirt/papers.html.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stang, P. J. 2003 Editorial: 124 years of publishing original and primary chemical research Journal of the American Chemical Society 125 18.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tijssen, R. J. W. 1992 A quantitative assessment of interdisciplinary structures in science and technology: coclassification analysis of energy research Research Policy 21 2744.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tomov, D. T. Mutafov, H. G. 1996 Comparative indicators of interdisciplinarity in modern science Scientometrics 37 267278.

Manuscript submission: http://www.editorialmanager.com/scim/

  • Impact Factor (2019): 2.867
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2019): 1.210
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2019): 106
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Computer Science Apllications
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Library and Information Sciences
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Impact Factor (2018): 2.770
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2018): 1.113
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2018): 95
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q1 Library and Information Sciences
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q1 Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer

Scientometrics
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1978
Volumes
per Year
4
Issues
per Year
12
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0138-9130 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2861 (Online)