Scientometrics
Volume/Issue:
Volume 60: Issue 1
Reward, persuasion, and the Sokal Hoax: A study in citation identities
Author:
Howard White College of Information Science and Technology, Drexel University Philadelphia PA 19104, USA

Search for other papers by Howard White in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Pages:
93–120
Online Publication Date:
15 Dec 2004
Publication Date:
01 May 2004
Article Category:
Research Article
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1023/b:scie.0000027313.91401.9b
Restricted access

A citation identity is a list of an author's citees ranked by how frequently that author has cited them in publications covered by the Institute for Scientific Information. The same Dialog software that creates identities can simultaneously show the overall citation counts of citees, which indicate their reputations. Using identities for 28 authors in several disciplines of science and scholarship, I show that the reputational counts of their citees always have an approximately log-normal distribution: citations to very famous names are roughly balanced by citations to obscure ones, and most citations go to authors of middling reputation. These results undercut claims by constructivists that the main function of citation is to marshal “big-name” support for arguments at the expense of crediting lesser-known figures. The results are better explained by Robert K. Merton's norm of universalism, which holds that citers are rewarding use of relevant intellectual property, than by the constructivists' particularism, which holds that citers are trying to persuade through manipulative rhetoric. A universalistic citation pattern appears even in Alan Sokal's famous hoax article, where some of his citing was deliberately particularistic. In fact, Sokal's basic adherence to universalism probably helped his hoax succeed, which suggests the strength of the Mertonian norm. In specimen cases, the constructivists themselves are shown as conforming to it.

  • BALDI, S. (1998), Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: A networkanalytic model. American Sociological Review, 63: 829–846.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • BLOOR, D. (1976), Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

  • BROOKS, T. A. (1984), Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36: 223–229.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • BROOKS, T. A. (1986), Evidence of complex citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37: 34–36.

  • BROWN, J. R. (2001), Who Rules in Science? An Opinionated Guide to the Wars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • COLE, J. R., COLE, S. (1973), Social Stratification in Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • COLE, S. (1992), Making Science; Between Nature and Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • COZZENS, S. E. (1989), What do citations count? The rhetoric-first model. Scientometrics, 15: 437–447.

  • H. D. WHITE : Reward, persuasion, and the Sokal Hoax Scientometrics 60 (2004) 119.

  • CRONIN, B., SHAW, D. (2002), Identity-creators and image-makers: Using citation analysis and thick description to put authors in their place. Scientometrics, 54: 31–49.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • EDGE, D. (1979), Quantitative measures of communication in science: A critical review. History of Science, 17: 103–134.

  • EDITORS OF LINGUA FRANCA. (2000), The Sokal Hoax; The Sham that Shook the Academy. Lingua Franca Books. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • GARFIELD, E., PUDOVKIN, A. I., ISTOMIN, V. S. (2003), Why do we need algorithmic historiography? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54: 400–412.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • GIERYN, T. (2003), Sociology of Science. http://www.indiana.edu/∼deanfac/blspr03/soc/soc_s660_3954.html.

  • GILBERT, G. N. (1977), Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 7: 113–122.

  • GRIFFITH, B. C. (1990), Understanding science: Studies of communication and information. In: C. L. BORGMAN (Ed.), Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. pp. 31–45.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • HAGSTROM, W. O. (1965), The Scientific Community. New York: Basic Books.

  • HESS, D. J. (1997), Science Studies; An Advanced Introduction. New York: New York University Press.

  • HOERMAN, H. L., NOWICKE, C. E. (1995), Secondary and tertiary citing: A study of reference behavior in the literature of citation analysis deriving from the Ortega hypothesis of Cole and Cole. Library Quarterly, 65: 415–434.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • KAPLAN, N. (1965), The norms of citation behavior: Prolegomena to the footnote. American Documentation, 16: 179–184.

  • KNORR-CETINA, K. (1981), The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • LANGHAM, T. (1995), Consistency in referencing. Journal of Documentation, 51: 360–369.

  • LATOUR, B. (1987), Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • LATOUR, B., WOOLGAR, S. (1979), Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

  • LAW, J.,WILLIAMS, R. J. (1982), Putting facts together: A study in scientific persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 12: 535–558.

  • LIU, M. (1993), The complexities of citation practice: A review of citation studies. Journal of Documentation, 49: 370–408.

  • LLOYD, C. (1997), I was Michel Foucault's love slave. Salon. http://www.salon.com/feb97/loveslave970210.html.

  • LUUKKONEN, T. (1990), Citations in the Rhetorical, Reward, and Communication Systems of Science. PhD dissertation. Tampere, Finland: University of Tampere.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • LUUKKONEN, T. (1997), Why has Latour's theory of citations been ignored by the bibliometric community? Discussion of sociological interpretations of citation analysis. Scientometrics, 38: 27–37.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • MACROBERTS, M. H., MACROBERTS, B. R. (1987), Testing the Ortega hypothesis: Facts and artifacts. Scientometrics, 12: 293–295.

  • MACROBERTS, M. H., MACROBERTS, B. R. (1996), Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics, 36: 435–444.

  • MCINNES, R. G., SYMES, D. (1988), David Riesman and the concept of bibliographic citation. College & Research Libraries, 12: 240–250.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • MERTON, R. K. (1942), Science and technology in a democratic order. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1: 115–126.

  • MERTON, R. K. (1957), Priorities in scientific discoveries. American Sociological Review, 22: 635–659.

  • MERTON, R. K. (1968), The Matthew Effect in science. Science, 159 (5): 56–63.

  • MERTON, R. K. (1979), Foreword to E. Garfield, Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities. New York: Wiley. v-ix.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • MERTON, R. K. (1988), The Matthew Effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. ISIS, 79: 606–623.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • MITROFF, I. I. (1974), The Subjective Side of Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier. H. D. WHITE: Reward, persuasion, and the Sokal Hoax 120 Scientometrics 60 (2004).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • NICOLAISEN, J. (2003), The social act of citing: Towards new horizons in citation theory. Proceedings, American Society for Information Science and Technology, 40: 12–20.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • PAGLIA, C. (1999), Butler vs. Nussbaum: When poststructuralist feminists begin to attack each other, the end of the PC dynasty is near. Salon. http://www.salon.com/it/col/pagl/1999/02/24pagl.html.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • POTTER J. (1996), Representing Reality; Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: Sage.

  • Scientometrics. (1987), Volume 12(5-6: 293-353) presented a controversy on citation and the Ortega hypothesis in which 13 papers responded to MacRoberts & MacRoberts, 1987.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • SOKAL, A. D. (1996), Transgressing the boundaries: Toward a transformative hermeneutics of quantum gravity. Social Text, 46/47: 217–252.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • SOKAL, A., BRICMONT, J. (1998), Fashionable Nonsense; Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science. New York: Picador USA.

  • STORER, N. W. (1966), The Social System of Science. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

  • THORNE, F. C. (1977), The Citation Index - Another case of spurious validity. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33: 1157–1161.

  • WHITE, H. D. (2000), Toward ego-centered citation analysis. In: B. CRONIN, H. B. ATKINS (Eds), The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield. Medford, NJ: Information Today. pp. 475–496.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • WHITE, H. D. (2001a), Authors as citers over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52: 87–108.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • WHITE, H. D. (2001b), Author-centered bibliometrics through CAMEOs: Characterizations automatically made and edited online. Scientometrics, 51: 607–637.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • WHITE, H. D. (2003), Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis: A remapping of paradigmatic information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54: 423–434.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • WHITE, H. D. (2004), Citation analysis and discourse analysis revisited. Applied Linguistics, 25: 89–116.

  • WHITE, H. D., MCCAIN, K. W. (1998), Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49: 327–355.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • WILLIS, E. (1996), My Sokaled life; Or, revenge of the nerds. In: EDITORS OF LINGUA FRANCA, The Sokal Hoax; The Sham that Shook the Academy. Lingua Franca Books. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. pp. 133–138.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • WOOLGAR, S. (1988), Science: The Very Idea. London: Tavistock.

  • ZUCKERMAN, H. (1987), Citation analysis and the complex problem of intellectual influence. Scientometrics, 12: 329–338.

  • ZUCKERMAN, H. (1988), The sociology of science. In: N. SMELSER (Ed.), Handbook of Sociology. Newbury Park: Sage. 511–574.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
Cover Scientometrics
Scientometrics
Print ISSN:
0138-9130
Online ISSN:
1588-2861

To see the editorial board, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Manuscript submission: http://www.editorialmanager.com/scim/

For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Scientometrics
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation		 1978
Volumes
per Year		 1
Issues
per Year		 12
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address		 H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address		 H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher		 Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0138-9130 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2861 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Mar 2024 31 0 0
Apr 2024 11 1 1
May 2024 11 0 0
Jun 2024 10 0 0
Jul 2024 27 0 0
Aug 2024 14 0 0
Sep 2024 2 0 0