View More View Less
  • 1 Polymer Processing and Flow (P-PROF) Group, School of Energy & Materials, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT), Thungkru, Bangmod, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
  • 2 KMUTT Central Library, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT), Bangkok (Thailand)
Restricted access

This article introduces a new modified method for calculating the impact factor of journals based on the current ISI practice in generating journal impact factor values. The impact factor value for a journal calculated by the proposed method, the so-called Cited Half-Life Impact Factor (CHAL) method, which is based on the ratio of the number of current year citations of articles from the previous X years to that of articles published in the previous X years, the X value being equal to the value of the cited half-life of the journal in the current year. Thirty-four journals in the Polymer Science Category from the ISI Subject Heading Categories were selected and examined. Total citations, impact factors and cited half-life of the 34 journals during the last five years (1997-2001) were retrieved from the ISI Journal Citation Reports and were used as the data source for the calculations in this work, the impact factor values from ISI and CHAL methods then being compared. The positions of the journals ranked by impact factors obtained from the ISI method were different from those from the CHAL method. It was concluded that the CHAL method was more suitable for calculating the impact factor of the journals than the existing ISI method.

  • 1. The Institute For Scientific Information (ISI) Philadelphia (USA), (1999) in http://www.isinet.com.

  • 2. Garfield, E. 1972 Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation Science 178 471479.

  • 3. Jimenez-Contreras, E. Lopez-Cozar, E. D. Ruiz-Perez, R. Fernandez, V. M. 2002 Impact-Factor rewards affect Spanish research Nature 417 898.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. Adam, D. 2002 News feature: The counting house Nature 415 726729.

  • 5. Sombatsompop, N. Ratchatahirun, P. Surathanasakul, V. Premkamolnetr, N. Markpin, T. 2002 A citation report of Thai academic journals during 1996–2000 Scientometrics 55 445462.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. GlÄnzel, W. Moed, H. F. 2002 Journal impact measures in bibliometric research Scientometrics 53 171193.

  • 7. Bordons, M. Fernandez, M. T. Gomez, I. 2002 Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance in a peripheral country Scientometrics 53 195206.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8. Gowrishankar, J. Divakar, P. 1999 Sprucing up one.s impact factor Nature 401 321322.

  • 9. Colquhoun, D. 2003 Challenging the tyranny of impact factors Nature 423 479.

  • 10. Garfield, E. 1986 The evolution of physical chemistry to chemical physics Current Contents 3 312.

  • 11. Hirst, G. 1978 Discipline Impact Factor: a method for determining core journal lists Journal of the American Society for Information Science 29 171172.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. Asai, I. 1981 Adjusted age distribution and its application to impact factor and immediacy index Journal of the American Society for Information Science 32 172174.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. GlÄnzel, W Schoepflin, U. 1995 A bibliometric study on aging and reception processes of scientific literature Journal of Information Science 21 3753.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. Moed, H. F. Luwel, M. Houben, J. A. Spruyt, E. Van Den Berghe, H. 1998 The effects of changes in the funding structure of the Flemish universities on their research capacity, productivity and impact during the 1980's and early 1990's Scientometrics 43 231255.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15. Vinkler, P. 1991 Possible causes of differences in information impact of journals from different subfields Scientometrics 20 145161.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16. Van Leeuwen, T. N. Moed, H. F. 2002 Development and application of journal impact factor measures in the Dutch science system Scientometrics 53 249266.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17. Vinkler, P. 2002 Subfield problems in applying the Garfield (Impact) Factors in practice Scientometrics 53 267279.

  • 18. Amin, M. Mabe, M. 2000 Impact factors: use and abuse Perspectives in Publishing 1 16.