Authors:
Bihui Jin Documentation and Information Centre of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Science Citation Database 33 Beisihuan Xilu, Zhongguancun, Beijing, 100080, P. R. China 33 Beisihuan Xilu, Zhongguancun, Beijing, 100080, P. R. China

Search for other papers by Bihui Jin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ronald Rousseau KHBO (Association K.U.Leuven), Industrial Sciences and Technology; Hasselt University Department of Industrial Sciences and Technology Zeedijk 101 Oostende (Belgium); Diepenbeek (Belgium) BE–8400 Oostende Zeedijk 101 Oostende (Belgium); Diepenbeek (Belgium) BE–8400 Oostende

Search for other papers by Ronald Rousseau in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Xiaoxing Sun Division of Laboratory Management National Natural Science Foundation of China Beijing (P. R. China) Beijing (P. R. China)

Search for other papers by Xiaoxing Sun in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Summary  

Chinese science has developed rapidly over the latest fifteen years. It is said that it is now in a quantitative expansion phase. A series of programmes extending over a period of twenty years has resulted in more than 160 Key Labs and nearly 400 Open Labs at present. The organization and evaluation of this system of labs is one of the strategic measures for scientific resource reorganization in China. The role played by these labs is analysed in this article using data from the Chinese Science Citation Database(CSCD) and the Science Citation Index(SCI). Nowadays almost one quarter of all internationally oriented Chinese publications originate from these labs. The same is true for citations received by Chinese scientists in the SCI. Comparisons between SCI-based and CSCD-based performance results show that the relative academic impact of Key Labs and Open Labs is more international than domestic. Key Labs have a higher total production and receive more citations than Open Labs. Yet their impact, measured as citations per publication, is very similar. We conclude that when it comes to impact on the international scene, these labs have not yet led to a big step forward for Chinese science as a whole. The fact that in the year 2004 a new evaluation procedure has been put in place means that the Chinese scientific authorities have recognized this fact and are dealing with it.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

To see the editorial board, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Manuscript submission: http://www.editorialmanager.com/scim/

For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Scientometrics
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1978
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
12
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0138-9130 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2861 (Online)