Author: Martin Meyer
View More View Less
  • 1 University of Sussex Freeman Centre, SPRU Brighton BN1 9QE UK Brighton BN1 9QE UK
  • 2 K.U. Leuven Steunpunt O&O Indicatoren van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap Leuven Belgium Leuven Belgium
  • 3 Helsinki University of Technology Institute of Strategy and International Business Espoo Finland Espoo Finland
Restricted access


This contribution formulates a number of propositions about the emergence of novel nanoscience and nanotechnology (N&N). Seeking to complement recent work that aims to define a research agenda and draws on general insights from the innovation literature, this paper aims to synthesize knowledge from innovation-related studies of the N&N field. More specifically, it is suggested that N&N is often misconstrued as either a field of technology or an area of (broadly) converging technologies while evidence to date suggests rather that N&N be considered a set of inter-related and overlapping about not necessarily merging technologies. The role of instrumentation in connecting the various N&N fields is underlined. Finally, the question is raised whether change in N&N tends to be incremental rather than discontinuous, being the result of technological path-dependencies and lock-ins in industry-typical search regimes that are only slowly giving way to more boundary-crossing activities.