View More View Less
  • 1 Industrial and Management Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, San 31, Hyoja-dong, Nam-gu, Pohang, Kyungbuk 790-784, Republic of Korea janghyoon@postech.ac.krblissray@postech.ac.kr
Restricted access

Cross Mark

Abstract

Technology analysis is a process which uses textual analysis to detect trends in technological innovation. Co-word analysis (CWA), a popular method for technology analysis, encompasses (1) defining a set of keyword or key phrase patterns which are represented in technology-dependent terms, (2) generating a network that codifies the relations between occurrences of keywords or key phrases, and (3) identifying specific trends from the network. However, defining the set of keyword or key phrase patterns heavily relies on effort of experts, who may be expensive or unavailable. Furthermore defining keyword or key phrase patterns of new or emerging technology areas may be a difficult task even for experts. To solve the limitation in CWA, this research adopts a property-function based approach. The property is a specific characteristic of a product, and is usually described using adjectives; the function is a useful action of a product, and is usually described using verbs. Properties and functions represent the innovation concepts of a system, so they show innovation directions in a given technology. The proposed methodology automatically extracts properties and functions from patents using natural language processing. Using properties and functions as nodes, and co-occurrences as links, an invention property-function network (IPFN) can be generated. Using social network analysis, the methodology analyzes technological implications of indicators in the IPFN. Therefore, without predefining keyword or key phrase patterns, the methodology assists experts to more concentrate on their knowledge services that identify trends in technological innovation from patents. The methodology is illustrated using a case study of patents related to silicon-based thin film solar cells.

  • Alcacer, J, Gittelman, M 2006 Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations. Review of Economics and Statistics 88 4 774779 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bollobas, B 1983 The evolution of sparse graphs. Graph theory and combinatorics Academic Press London 3557.

  • Callon, M, Courtial, J, Laville, F 1991 Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics 22 1 155205 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Callon, M, Courtial, J, Turner, W, Bauin, S 1983 From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information 22 2 191 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chang, P, Wu, C, Leu, H 2010 Using patent analyses to monitor the technological trends in an emerging field of technology: A case of carbon nanotube field emission display. Scientometrics 82 1 519 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, L., Tokuda, N., & Adachi, H. (2003). A patent document retrieval system addressing both semantic and syntactic properties. In: Proceedings of the ACL-2003 workshop on patent corpus processing (pp. 16). Japan: Sapporo.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Choi, S., Lim, J., Yoon, J., & Kim, K. (2010). Patent function network analysis: In: A function based approach for analyzing patent information. Egypt, Cairo: IAMOT.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • de Marneffe, M., & Manning, C. (2008a). Stanford typed dependencies manual. Technical report.

  • de Marneffe, M., & Manning, C. (2008b). The stanford typed dependencies representation. In: Association for computational linguistics (pp. 18). Stanford: Stanford University.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dewulf, S. (2006). Directed variation: Variation of properties for new or improved function product DNA, a base for ‘connect and develop’. Kortrijk, Belgium: ETRIA TRIZ Futures.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diestel, R. (2005). Graph theory. Graduate texts in mathematics (vol. 173). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

  • Freeman, L 1979 Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1 3 215239 .

  • Hanneman, R, Riddle, M 2005 Introduction to social network methods University of California, Riverside Riverside, CA.

  • Hendrix, D 2009 Institutional self-citation rates: A three year study of universities in the United States. Scientometrics 81 2 321331 .

  • Hirtz, J, Stone, R, McAdams, D, Szykman, S, Wood, K 2001 A functional basis for engineering design: Reconciling and evolving previous efforts. Research in Engineering Design 13 2 6582.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hopcroft, J, Tarjan, R 1973 Algorithm 447: Efficient algorithms for graph manipulation. Communications of the ACM 16 6 372378 .

  • Klein, D, Manning, C 2003 Fast exact inference with a factored model for natural language parsing. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15:310.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kostoff, R 1998 The use and misuse of citation analysis in research evaluation. Scientometrics 43 1 2743 .

  • Lee, B, Jeong, Y 2008 Mapping Korea's national R&D domain of robot technology by using the co-word analysis. Scientometrics 77 1 319 .

  • Mann, D 2002 Hands-on systematic innovation Creax press .

  • Neff, M, Corley, E 2009 35 years and 160, 000 articles: A bibliometric exploration of the evolution of ecology. Scientometrics 80 3 657682 .

  • Pritchard, A 1969 Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of documentation 25 4 348349.

  • Stanford. (2010). The stanford parser: A statistical parser. http://nlp.stanford.edu/software/lex-parser.shtml.

  • STOPWORDS. (2010). English stopwords. http://www.ranks.nl/resources/stopwords.html.

  • Thompson, P, Fox-Kean, M 2005 Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: A reassessment. American Economic Review 95 1 450460 .

  • Tong, L, Cong, H, Lixiang, S 2006 Automatic classification of patent documents for triz users. World Patent Information 28 1 613 .

  • Verhaegen, PA, D’Hondt, J, Vertommen, J, Dewulf, S, Duflou, JR 2009 Relating properties and functions from patents to triz trends. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 1 3 126130 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yoon, B, Park, Y 2004 A text-mining-based patent network: Analytical tool for high-technology trend. The Journal of High Technology Management Research 15 1 3750 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, L, Janssens, F, Liang, L, Glanzel, W 2010 Journal cross-citation analysis for validation and improvement of journal-based subject classification in bibliometric research. Scientometrics 82 3 687706 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, W, Qian, W, Ho, Y 2009 A bibliometric analysis of research related to ocean circulation. Scientometrics 80 2 305316 .