Scientometrics
Volume/Issue:
Volume 87: Issue 1
Empirical study of journal impact factors obtained using the classical two-year citation window versus a five-year citation window
Author:
Juan Miguel Campanario Departamento de Física, Universidad de Alcalá, 28871 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain

Search for other papers by Juan Miguel Campanario in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Pages:
189–204
Online Publication Date:
01 Jan 2011
Publication Date:
01 Apr 2011
Article Category:
Research Article
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0334-1
Keywords:
Journal impact factor; Citation window
Restricted access

Abstract

In this article I study characteristics of the journal impact factor (JIF) computed using a 5-year citation window as compared with the classical JIF computed using a 2-year citation window. Since 2007 ISI-Thomson Reuters has published the new 5-year impact factor in the JCR database. I studied changes in the distribution of JIFs when the citation window was enlarged. The distributions of journals according their 5-year JIFs were very similar all years studied, and were also similar to the distribution according to the 2-year JIFs. In about 72% of journals, the JIF increased when the longer citation window was used. Plots of 5-year JIFs against rank closely followed a beta function with two exponents. Thus, the 5-year JIF seems to behave very similarly to the 2-year JIF. The results also suggest that gains in JIF with the longer citation window tend to distribute similarly in all years. Changes in these gains also tend to distribute similarly from 1 year to the following year.

  • Amin, M, Mabe, M 2000 Impact factors: Use and abuse. Perspectives in Publishing 1:1–6.

  • Archambault, E, Larivière, V 2009 History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences. Scientometrics 79:635–649 .

  • Bar-Ilan, J 2008 Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review. Journal of Informetrics 2:1–52 .

  • Bensman, SJ 2007 Garfield and the impact factor. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 41:93–155 .

  • Brown, A 2007 How impact factors changed medical publishing-and science. British Medical Journal 334:561–564 .

  • Campanario, JM 2010 Distribution of changes in impact factors over time. Scientometrics 84:35–42 .

  • Franceschet, M 2010 Journal influence factors. Journal of Informetrics 4:239–248 .

  • Garfield, E 1955 Citation indexes to science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science 122:108–111 .

  • Glänzel, W, Moed, HF 2002 Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics 53:171–193 .

  • Gomez-Sancho, JM, Mancebon-Torrubia, MJ 2009 The evaluation of scientific production: Towards a neutral impact factor. Scientometrics 81:435–458 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jacso, P 2009 Five-year impact factor data in the Journal Citation Reports. Online Information Review 33:603–614 .

  • Kleijnen, JPC W Van Groenendaal 2000 Measuring the quality of publications: New methodology and case study. Information Processing & Management 36:551–570 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kuo, W, Rupe, J 2007 R-impact factor: Reliability-based citation impact factor. IEEE Transaction on Reliability 56:366–367 .

  • Mansilla, R, Köppen, E, Cocho, G, Miramontes, P 2007 On the behavior of journal impact factor rank-order distribution. Journal of Informetrics 1:155–160 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Neuhaus, C, Marx, W, Daniel, HD 2009 The publication and citation impact profiles of Angewandte Chemie and the Journal of the American Chemical Society based on the sections of Chemical Abstracts: A case study on the limitations of the journal impact factor. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60:176–183 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rossner, M H Van Epps Hill, E 2007 Show me the data. Journal of Cell Biology 179:1091–1092 .

  • Rossner, M H Van Epps Hill, E 2008 Irreproducible results: A response to Thomson Scientific. Journal of Cell Biology 180:254–255 .

  • Rousseau, R. (1988). Citation distribution of pure mathematics journals. In L. Egghe & R. Rousseau (eds.), Informetrics 87/88 (pp. 249–262). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rousseau, R, Jin, B, Yang, N 2001 Observations concerning the two- and three-year synchronous impact factor, based on the Chinese science citation database. Journal of Documentation 57:349–357 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rowlands, I 2002 Journal diffusion factors: A new approach to measuring research influence. Aslib Proceedings 54:77–84 .

  • Sombatsompop, N, Markpin, T, Premkamolnetr, N 2004 A modified method for calculating the Impact Factors of journals in ISI Journal Citation Reports: Polymer Science category in 1997–2001. Scientometrics 60:217–235 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Stimulate 9 Group A. (2009). The 5-year synchronous impact factor for large JCR subject areas. Cybermetrics, 13, http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/v13i1p5.html. Accessed 11 November 2010.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • TN Van Leeuwen Moed, HF 2002 Development and application of journal impact measures in the Dutch science system. Scientometrics 53:249–266 .

  • TN Van Leeuwen Moed, HF, Reedijk, J 1999 Critical comments on Institute for Scientific Information impact factors: A sample of inorganic molecular chemistry journals. Journal of Information Science 25:489–498 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Vanclay, JK 2009 Bias in the journal impact factor. Scientometrics 78:3–12 .

  • Walter, G, Bloch, S, Hunt, G, Fisher, K 2003 Counting on citations: A flawed way to measure quality. Medical Journal of Australia 178:280–283.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Yu, G, Yang, DH, Liang, W 2010 Reliability-based citation impact factor and the manipulation of impact factor. Scientometrics 83:259–270 .

  • Collapse
  • Expand
Cover Scientometrics
Scientometrics
Print ISSN:
0138-9130
Online ISSN:
1588-2861

To see the editorial board, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Manuscript submission: http://www.editorialmanager.com/scim/

For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Scientometrics
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation		 1978
Volumes
per Year		 1
Issues
per Year		 12
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address		 H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address		 H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher		 Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0138-9130 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2861 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Nov 2024 42 0 0
Dec 2024 32 0 0
Jan 2025 46 0 0
Feb 2025 28 0 0
Mar 2025 25 0 0
Apr 2025 22 2 2
May 2025 0 0 0