Ranking of 91 countries based on the Technology Achievement Index 2009 (TAI-09) (2009 refers to the year in which most of data collection was carried out.) is reported. Originally proposed in 2002, the TAI is a composite indicator which aggregates national technological capabilities and performance in terms of creation/diffusion of new technologies, diffusion of old technologies and development of human skills. In addition to the overall ranking of 91 countries, rankings in each sub-dimension of the Index are also reported. Comparative analysis of TAI ranking of 56 countries, common to the present and previous study of 2002 under similar conditions, is quite instructive and indicates shifts in technological scenario of these countries even over a relatively short period of 5–6 years. A simple concept based on Standard Deviation approach, as an indication of the technological spread or otherwise, is proposed for the first time. Application of this concept to 56 common countries is reported.
Archibugi, D., & Coco, A. (2004). A new indicator of technology capabilities for developed and developing countries (ArCO). Working Paper No. 111, SPRU, Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Sussex, UK.
Desai, M, Fukuda-Parr, S, Johansson, C, Sagasti, F 2002 Measuring the technology achievement of nations and capacity to participate in the network age. Journal of Human Development 3 1 95–122 .
Porter, A., Roessner, D., Newman, N., Jin, X., & Johnson, D. (2005). High tech indicators: Technology-based comptivtiveness of 33 nations 2005 final report. Atlanta: Technology Policy and Assesment Center, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Sharjeel, S. (Private Communication, 2009) World Bank, Pakistan, E-mail message.
Uis, UNESCO. (Private Communication, 2009). E-mail message.
UNESCO (2009). Institute of statistics. http://www.uis.unesco.org.
United Nation Development Programme (Undp). (2008). Human development report 2007/2008, fighting climate change: Human solidarity in a divided world. New York: Oxford University Press. http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics.
Wagner C. S. (Private Communication, 2009). Center for International Science and Technology Policy (CISTP) The George Washington University, E-mail message.
Wagner, C. S., Horlings, E., & Dutta, A. (2002). Can science and technology capacity be measured. Santa Monica, California: Rand Corporation.
World Bank. (2009a). Online database of knowledge assessment methodology. www.worldbank.org/kam.
World Bank. (2009b). Online database of world bank indicators. http://ddp-ext.worldbank.org.