This study aims to investigate the influence of different patterns of collaboration on the citation impact of Harvard University's publications. Those documents published by researchers affiliated with Harvard University in WoS from 2000–2009, constituted the population of the research which was counted for 124,937 records. Based on the results, only 12% of Harvard publications were single author publications. Different patterns of collaboration were investigated in different subject fields. In all 22 examined fields, the number of co-authored publications is much higher than single author publications. In fact, more than 60% of all publications in each field are multi-author publications. Also, the normalized citation per paper for co-authored publications is higher than that of single author publications in all fields. In addition, the largest number of publications in all 22 fields were also published through inter-institutional collaboration and were as a result of collaboration among domestic researchers and not international ones. In general, the results of the study showed that there was a significant positive correlation between the number of authors and the number of citations in Harvard publications. In addition, publications with more number of institutions have received more number of citations, whereas publications with more number of foreign collaborators were not much highly cited.
Abt, HA 2007 The frequencies of multinational papers in various sciences. Scientometrics 72 1 105–115 .
Baldi, S 1998 Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: a network-analytic model. American Sociological Review 63:829–846 .
Beaver, DB 1986 Collaboration and teamwork in physics. Czechoslovak Journal of Physics 36:14–18 .
Beaver, DB 2004 Does collaborative research have greater epistemic authority?. Scientometrics 60:399–408 .
Bordons, M, Garcia Jover, F, Barrigon, S 1993 Is collaboration improving research visibility?. Research Evaluation 3 1 19–24.
Glänzel, W 2001 National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics 51:69–115 .
Glänzel, W C De Lange 2002 A distributional approach to multinationality measures of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics 54:75–89 .
Katz, JS, Hicks, D 1997 How much a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics 40:541–554 .
Katz, JS, Martin, BR 1997 What is research collaboration?. Research Policy 26 1 1–18 .
Lawani, SM 1986 Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research. Scientometrics 9:13–25 .
Luukkonen, T, Persson, O, Sivertsen, G 1992 Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology and Human Values 17:101–126 .
Narin, F., & Whitlow, E. S. (1990). Measurement of scientific co-operation and co-authorship in CEC related areas of science. Report EUR 12900. Office for Official Publications in the European Communities, Luxembourg.
Narin, F, Stevens, K, Whitlow, ES 1991 Scientific cooperation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers. Scientometrics 21 3 313–323 .
Patel, N 1972 Collaboration in the professional growth of American Sociology. Social Science Information 12 6 77–92.
Schmoch, U, Schubert, T 2008 Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research?. Scientometrics 74 3 361–377 .
Schrage, M 1995 No more teams: mastering the dynamics of creative collaboration Currency and Doubleday New York.
Sooryamoorthy, R 2009 Do types of collaboration change citation? Collaboration and citation patterns of South African science publications. Scientometrics 81 1 177–193 .
AFJ Van Raan 1997 Science as an international enterprise. Science and Public Policy 24 5 290–300.
Wagner-Doebler, R 2001 Continuity and discontinuity of collaboration behaviour since 1800 from a bibliometric point of view. Scientometrics 52:503–517 .
Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., van Leeuwen, T. N., Visser, M. S., & van Raan A. F. J. (2010). Towards a new crown indicator: an empirical analysis. http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.2167v2. Accessed 2 June 2010.