Authors:
,
,
, and
Veljko Jeremic
Veljko Jeremic
Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Belgrade, Jove Ilica 154, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia
Search for other papers by Veljko Jeremic in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Veljko Jeremic in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Milica Bulajic
Milica Bulajic
Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Belgrade, Jove Ilica 154, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia
Search for other papers by Milica Bulajic in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Milica Bulajic in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Milan Martic
Milan Martic
Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Belgrade, Jove Ilica 154, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia
Search for other papers by Milan Martic in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Milan Martic in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Zoran Radojicic
Zoran Radojicic
Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Belgrade, Jove Ilica 154, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia
Search for other papers by Zoran Radojicic in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Zoran Radojicic in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The aim of this article is to present new ideas in evaluating Shanghai University's Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU). One issue frequently put forth in various publications is that the Shanghai rankings are sensitive to the relative weight they attribute to each variable. As a possible remedy to this issue, the statistical I-distance method is proposed to be used. Based on a sample containing the top 100 ranked universities, the results show a significant correlation with the official ARWU list. However, some inconsistencies concerning European universities have been noticed and elaborated upon.
ProCite
RefWorks
Reference Manager
BibTeX
Zotero
EndNote
-
Agasisti, T, Perez-Esparrells, C 2010 Comparing efficiency in a cross-country perspective: The case of Italian and Spanish state universities. Higher Education 59:85–103 .
-
Aguillo, I, Bar-IIan, J, Levene, M, Ortega, JL 2010 Comparing university rankings. Scientometrics 85 1 243–256 .
-
Billaut, JC, Bouyssou, D, Vincke, P 2010 Should you believe in the Shanghai ranking: An MCDM view. Scientometrics 84 1 237–263 .
-
Bowman, N., & Bastedo, M. (2010). Anchoring effects in world university rankings: Exploring biases in reputation scores. Higher Education. doi: .
-
Dehon, C, McCathie, A, Verardi, V 2010 Uncovering excellence in academic rankings: A closer look at the Shanghai ranking. Scientometrics 83 2 515–524 .
-
Docampo, D. (2008). International rankings and quality of the university systems. Revista Education, 15(SI), 149-176.
-
Docampo, D 2011 On using the Shanghai ranking to assess the research performance of university systems. Scientometrics 86 1 77–92 .
-
Florian, RV 2007 Irreproducibility of the results of the Shanghai academic ranking of world universities. Scientometrics 72 1 25–32 .
-
Hien, PD 2010 A comparative study of research capabilities of East Asian countries and implications for Vietnam. Higher Education 60:615–625 .
-
Ivanovic, B 1973 A method of establishing a list of development indicators United Nations educational, scientific and cultural organization Paris.
-
Ivanovic, B 1977 Classification theory Institute for Industrial Economics Belgrade.
-
Ivanovic, B, Fanchette, S 1973 Grouping and ranking of 30 countries of Sub-Saharan Africa, two distance-based methods compared United Nations educational, scientific and cultural organization Paris.
-
Jeremic, V., & Radojicic, Z. (2010). A new approach in the evaluation of team chess championships rankings. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 6(3). doi: .
-
Liu, NC, Cheng, Y 2005 Academic ranking of world universities: Methodologies and problems. Higher Education in Europe 30 2 127–136 .
-
Liu, NC, Cheng, Y, Liu, L 2005 Academic ranking of world universities using scientometrics: A comment to the “fatal attraction”. Scientometrics 64 1 101–109 .
-
Lukman, R, Krajnc, D, Glavic, P 2010 University ranking using research, educational and environmental indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production 18 7 619–628 .
-
Mihailovic, N, Bulajic, M, Savic, G 2009 Ranking of rankings: benchmarking twenty-five higher education ranking systems in Europe. Higher Education 60 5 507–528.
-
Stolz, I, Hendel, D, Horn, A 2010 Ranking of rankings: benchmarking twenty-five higher education ranking systems in Europe. Higher Education 60 5 507–528 .
-
AFJ van Raan 2005 Fatal attraction: Ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics 62:133–145 .
-
AFJ van Raan 2005 Reply to the comments of Liu et al. Scientometrics 64 1 111–112 .
To see the editorial board, please visit the website of Springer Nature.
Manuscript submission: http://www.editorialmanager.com/scim/
For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer Nature.
| Scientometrics | |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Size | B5 |
| Year of Foundation |
1978 |
| Volumes per Year |
1 |
| Issues per Year |
12 |
| Founder | Akadémiai Kiadó |
| Founder's Address |
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245. |
| Publisher | Akadémiai Kiadó Springer Nature Switzerland AG |
| Publisher's Address |
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245. CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11. |
| Responsible Publisher |
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó |
| ISSN | 0138-9130 (Print) |
| ISSN | 1588-2861 (Online) |
Monthly Content Usage
| Abstract Views | Full Text Views | PDF Downloads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2024 | 11 | 0 | 1 |
| Apr 2024 | 47 | 0 | 0 |
| May 2024 | 27 | 5 | 1 |
| Jun 2024 | 27 | 1 | 1 |
| Jul 2024 | 43 | 0 | 0 |
| Aug 2024 | 58 | 3 | 3 |
| Sep 2024 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
Author:
Author:
Copyright Akadémiai Kiadó AKJournals is the trademark of Akadémiai Kiadó's journal publishing business branch.
Powered by PubFactory