View More View Less
  • 1 Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Belgrade, Jove Ilica 154, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia
Restricted access

Abstract

The aim of this article is to present new ideas in evaluating Shanghai University's Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU). One issue frequently put forth in various publications is that the Shanghai rankings are sensitive to the relative weight they attribute to each variable. As a possible remedy to this issue, the statistical I-distance method is proposed to be used. Based on a sample containing the top 100 ranked universities, the results show a significant correlation with the official ARWU list. However, some inconsistencies concerning European universities have been noticed and elaborated upon.

  • Agasisti, T, Perez-Esparrells, C 2010 Comparing efficiency in a cross-country perspective: The case of Italian and Spanish state universities. Higher Education 59:85103 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Aguillo, I, Bar-IIan, J, Levene, M, Ortega, JL 2010 Comparing university rankings. Scientometrics 85 1 243256 .

  • Billaut, JC, Bouyssou, D, Vincke, P 2010 Should you believe in the Shanghai ranking: An MCDM view. Scientometrics 84 1 237263 .

  • Bowman, N., & Bastedo, M. (2010). Anchoring effects in world university rankings: Exploring biases in reputation scores. Higher Education. doi: .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dehon, C, McCathie, A, Verardi, V 2010 Uncovering excellence in academic rankings: A closer look at the Shanghai ranking. Scientometrics 83 2 515524 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Docampo, D. (2008). International rankings and quality of the university systems. Revista Education, 15(SI), 149-176.

  • Docampo, D 2011 On using the Shanghai ranking to assess the research performance of university systems. Scientometrics 86 1 7792 .

  • Florian, RV 2007 Irreproducibility of the results of the Shanghai academic ranking of world universities. Scientometrics 72 1 2532 .

  • Hien, PD 2010 A comparative study of research capabilities of East Asian countries and implications for Vietnam. Higher Education 60:615625 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ivanovic, B 1973 A method of establishing a list of development indicators United Nations educational, scientific and cultural organization Paris.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ivanovic, B 1977 Classification theory Institute for Industrial Economics Belgrade.

  • Ivanovic, B, Fanchette, S 1973 Grouping and ranking of 30 countries of Sub-Saharan Africa, two distance-based methods compared United Nations educational, scientific and cultural organization Paris.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jeremic, V., & Radojicic, Z. (2010). A new approach in the evaluation of team chess championships rankings. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 6(3). doi: .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, NC, Cheng, Y 2005 Academic ranking of world universities: Methodologies and problems. Higher Education in Europe 30 2 127136 .

  • Liu, NC, Cheng, Y, Liu, L 2005 Academic ranking of world universities using scientometrics: A comment to the “fatal attraction”. Scientometrics 64 1 101109 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lukman, R, Krajnc, D, Glavic, P 2010 University ranking using research, educational and environmental indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production 18 7 619628 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mihailovic, N, Bulajic, M, Savic, G 2009 Ranking of rankings: benchmarking twenty-five higher education ranking systems in Europe. Higher Education 60 5 507528.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stolz, I, Hendel, D, Horn, A 2010 Ranking of rankings: benchmarking twenty-five higher education ranking systems in Europe. Higher Education 60 5 507528 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AFJ van Raan 2005 Fatal attraction: Ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics 62:133145 .

  • AFJ van Raan 2005 Reply to the comments of Liu et al. Scientometrics 64 1 111112 .

Manuscript submission: http://www.editorialmanager.com/scim/

  • Impact Factor (2019): 2.867
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2019): 1.210
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2019): 106
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Computer Science Apllications
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Library and Information Sciences
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Impact Factor (2018): 2.770
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2018): 1.113
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2018): 95
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q1 Library and Information Sciences
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q1 Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer

Scientometrics
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1978
Volumes
per Year
4
Issues
per Year
12
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0138-9130 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2861 (Online)