The aim of this article is to observe differences between research areas when it comes to establish collaboration ties with local, national or international partners. It also intends to determine in what extent the collaboration can influence the patent transfer. A collaboration network between CSIC researchers and their external collaborators was built. Several statistical tests were used to find significant differences between research areas. A multiple regression model was also utilized in order to know what type of collaboration is more successful to transfer a patent. The results show that there are two well defined groups. A “Bio” group with a high international collaboration pattern but less national participation; and a “Physicist” group supported by a high proportion of national partners but with few international connections. The regression analysis found that the national collaboration is the variable that most increase the patent transfer.
Agrawal, A2000Importing scientific inventions: Direct interaction, geography and economic performanceMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyMimeo.
Importing scientific inventions: Direct interaction, geography and economic performance
Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyMimeo.)| false
Boccardelli, P., Leone, M. I., Magnusson, M., & Reichstein, T. (2010). Fuel on the invention funnel: Technology licensing-in, antecedents and invention. [working paper]. Aalborg: DRUID. http://www3.druid.dk/wp/20100013.pdf.
Boccardelli, P., Leone, M. I., Magnusson, M., & Reichstein, T. (2010). Fuel on the invention funnel: Technology licensing-in, antecedents and invention. [working paper]. Aalborg: DRUID. http://www3.druid.dk/wp/20100013.pdf.)| false
Goktepe, D. (2006). Identification of university inventors and university patenting patterns at Lund University: Conceptual, methodological & empirical findings. Copenhagen, Denmark: DRUID winter conference. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/1628/1/MPRA_paper_1628.pdf.)| false
Lee, YG2009What affects a patent's value? An analysis of variables that affect technological, direct economic and indirect economic value: An exploratory conceptual approach. Scientometrics793623–63310.1007/s11192-007-2020-5.)| false
Lissoni, F., & Montobbio, F. (2008) Guest authors or ghost inventors? Inventorship attribution in academic patents. The 25th DRUID celebration conference 2008 on entrepreneurship and innovation, Copenhagen, Denmark. http://www.econ.kuleuven.be/msi/_docs/workshops/2008-04-24.pdf.)| false
Lowe, R. A. (2002). Entrepreneurship and information asymmetry: Theory and evidence from the University of California. Working paper. 11/25/02, http://littlehurt.tepper.cmu.edu/gsiadoc/wp/2003-09.pdf.)| false
Meyer, M, Bhattacharya, S2004Commonalities and differences between scholarly and technical collaboration: An exploration of co-invention and co-authorship analyses. Scientometrics613443–45610.1023/B:SCIE.0000045120.04489.80.)| false
Mowery, D. C., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2001). The geographic reach of market and non-market channels of technology transfer: Comparing citations and licenses of university patents. NBER working paper series, w8568. http://dimetic.dime-eu.org/dimetic_files/MoweryZiedonis2004%20University%20Licenses%201.pdf.)| false
Ortega, JL, Aguillo, IF2010La participación española en los programas europeos: Análisis estructural del área de salud del 6º Programa Marco. Revista Española de Documentación Científica332287–29710.3989/redc.2010.2.741.)| false
Sapsalis, E. (2007). From science to license: An exploratory analysis of the value of academic patents, working papers CEB 07-018. RS, Universite Libre de Bruxelles. https://dipot.ulb.ac.be:8443/dspace/bitstream/2013/53932/1/RePEc_sol_wpaper_07-018.pdf.)| false
Vinding, A. L. (2002). Interorganizational diffusion and transformation of knowledge in the process of product innovation, Ph. D. thesis. Denmark: Aalborg University http://www.business.aau.dk/∼alv/Vinding-Dissertation.pdf.)| false
Yoshikane, F2006Comparative analysis of co-authorship networks considering authors’ roles in collaboration: Differences between the theoretical and application areas. Scientometrics683643–65510.1007/s11192-006-0113-1.)| false