View More View Less
  • 1 R&D Unit, CSIC, Serrano, 113, 28006, Madrid, Spain
Restricted access

Abstract

The aim of this article is to observe differences between research areas when it comes to establish collaboration ties with local, national or international partners. It also intends to determine in what extent the collaboration can influence the patent transfer. A collaboration network between CSIC researchers and their external collaborators was built. Several statistical tests were used to find significant differences between research areas. A multiple regression model was also utilized in order to know what type of collaboration is more successful to transfer a patent. The results show that there are two well defined groups. A “Bio” group with a high international collaboration pattern but less national participation; and a “Physicist” group supported by a high proportion of national partners but with few international connections. The regression analysis found that the national collaboration is the variable that most increase the patent transfer.

  • Agrawal, A 2000 Importing scientific inventions: Direct interaction, geography and economic performance Massachusetts Institute of Technology Mimeo.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Balconi, M, Breschi, S, Lissoni, F 2004 Networks of inventors and the role of academia: An exploration of Italian patent data. Research Policy 33:127145 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boccardelli, P., Leone, M. I., Magnusson, M., & Reichstein, T. (2010). Fuel on the invention funnel: Technology licensing-in, antecedents and invention. [working paper]. Aalborg: DRUID. http://www3.druid.dk/wp/20100013.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bordons, M, Gomez, I 2000 Collaboration networks in science B Cronin HB Atkins eds. The web of knowledge: A festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield Information Today NJ.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boyack, KW, Klavans, R, Börner, K 2005 Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics 64 3 351374 .

  • CSIC 2006 Plan de Actuación 2006–2009 CSIC Madrid.

  • Dunn, OJ 1961 Multiple comparisons among means. Journal of the American Statistical Association 56:5464 .

  • Frame, JD, Carpenter, MP 1979 International research collaboration. Social Studies of Science 9 4 481497 .

  • Godoe, H 2000 Innovation regimes, R&D and radical innovations in telecommunications. Research Policy 29:10331046 .

  • Goktepe, D. (2006). Identification of university inventors and university patenting patterns at Lund University: Conceptual, methodological & empirical findings. Copenhagen, Denmark: DRUID winter conference. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/1628/1/MPRA_paper_1628.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hagstrom, WO 1965 The scientific community Basic Books New York.

  • Hansen, MT 1999 The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly 44:82111 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Katz, JS, Martin, BR 1997 What is research collaboration?. Research Policy 26 1 118 .

  • Kruskall, WH, Wallis, WA 1952 Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 47 260 583621 .

  • Lee, YG 2009 What affects a patent's value? An analysis of variables that affect technological, direct economic and indirect economic value: An exploratory conceptual approach. Scientometrics 79 3 623633 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lissoni, F, Llerena, P, McKelvey, M, Sanditov, B 2008 Academic patenting in Europe: New evidence from the KEINS database. Research Evaluation 17 2 87102 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lissoni, F., & Montobbio, F. (2008) Guest authors or ghost inventors? Inventorship attribution in academic patents. The 25th DRUID celebration conference 2008 on entrepreneurship and innovation, Copenhagen, Denmark. http://www.econ.kuleuven.be/msi/_docs/workshops/2008-04-24.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lowe, R. A. (2002). Entrepreneurship and information asymmetry: Theory and evidence from the University of California. Working paper. 11/25/02, http://littlehurt.tepper.cmu.edu/gsiadoc/wp/2003-09.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McCarthy, JT, Schecter, RE, Franklyn, DJ 2004 McCarthy's desk encyclopedia of intellectual property 3 The Bureau of National Affairs Washington.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meyer, M, Bhattacharya, S 2004 Commonalities and differences between scholarly and technical collaboration: An exploration of co-invention and co-authorship analyses. Scientometrics 61 3 443456 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mowery, D. C., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2001). The geographic reach of market and non-market channels of technology transfer: Comparing citations and licenses of university patents. NBER working paper series, w8568. http://dimetic.dime-eu.org/dimetic_files/MoweryZiedonis2004%20University%20Licenses%201.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ortega, JL, Aguillo, IF 2010 La participación española en los programas europeos: Análisis estructural del área de salud del 6º Programa Marco. Revista Española de Documentación Científica 33 2 287297 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Powell, WW, Grodal, S 2004 Networks of innovations J Fagerberg D Mowery RR Nelson eds. The oxford handbook of innovation University Press Oxford.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Price, D J de S 1986 Little science, big science…and beyond Columbia University Press New York.

  • Sapsalis, E. (2007). From science to license: An exploratory analysis of the value of academic patents, working papers CEB 07-018. RS, Universite Libre de Bruxelles. https://dipot.ulb.ac.be:8443/dspace/bitstream/2013/53932/1/RePEc_sol_wpaper_07-018.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vinding, A. L. (2002). Interorganizational diffusion and transformation of knowledge in the process of product innovation, Ph. D. thesis. Denmark: Aalborg University http://www.business.aau.dk/∼alv/Vinding-Dissertation.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hsieh, W. H., Chiu, W. T., Lee, Y. S., & Ho, Y. S. (2004). Bibliometric analysis of patent ductus arteriosus treatments. Scientometrics, 60 (2), 205215.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yoshikane, F 2006 Comparative analysis of co-authorship networks considering authors’ roles in collaboration: Differences between the theoretical and application areas. Scientometrics 68 3 643655 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation