View More View Less
  • 1 School of Management Engineering, Xi'an University of Posts and Telecommunications, Xi'an 710061, Shaanxi Province, People's Republic of China
  • | 2 School of Management, Graduate University, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China
Restricted access

Abstract

The patents of China in biotechnology in the United States Patent and Trademark Office during 1995–2008 have been analyzed in this paper with the help of bibliometrics and social network analysis techniques. The analysis has been carried out from several perspectives including total patent output of industries, universities and public research institutes (PRIs) and their positions in the knowledge network, the main innovators and their interactions, the collaboration among Chinese regions and the collaborations from abroad. The results show that though with some improvements, the patent performance of Chinese organizations and regions in biotechnology still need to be improved. The connections between Chinese innovators are not very cohesive and they depend heavily on foreign knowledge, especial knowledge from U.S. multinational firms and universities. The important innovators of China in this field are mainly PRIs and universities. More and stronger firm innovators, especially large and powerful multinational companies, are strongly needed for the nation's biotechnology industry.

  • BIO. (2008). Guide to biotechnology 2008. Washington, DC: BIO.

  • S Breschi F Malerba eds. 2005 Clusters Networks and Innovation Oxford University Press Oxford.

  • Cantner, U, Graf, H 2006 The network of innovators in Jena: An application of social network analysis. Research Policy 35 4 463480 .

  • Chen, ZF, Guan, JC 2010 The impact of small world on innovation: An empirical study of 16 countries. Journal of Informetrics 4 1 97106 .

  • Ernst and Young LLP 2007 Beyond borders: the global biotechnology report 2007 Ernst and Young LLP Palo Alto.

  • Fleming, L, King, C, Juda, AI 2007 Small worlds and regional innovation. Organization Science 18:938954 .

  • Gao, X, Guan, JC 2009 Networks of scientific journals: An exploration of Chinese patent data. Scientometrics 80 1 283302 .

  • Gao, X, Guan, JC 2009 A scale-independent analysis of the performance of the Chinese innovation system. Journal of Informetrics 3 4 321331 .

  • Gilding, M 2008 ‘The tyranny of distance’: Biotechnology networks and clusters in the antipodes. Research Policy 37:11321144 .

  • Glaser, V. (2007). China expanding bioresearch acivities. Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News, 27 (28), 1.

  • Guan, JC, He, Y 2007 Patent-bibliometric analysis on the Chinese science-technology linkages. Scientometrics 72 3 403425 .

  • Guan, JC, Wang, GB 2010 A comparative study of research performance in nanotechnology for China's inventor-authors and their non-inventing peers. Scientometrics 84 2 331343 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hanaki, N, Nakajima, R, Ogura, Y 2010 The dynamics of R&D network in the IT industry. Research Policy 39 3 386399 .

  • Hertzum, M 2008 Collaborative information seeking: The combined activity of information seeking and collaborative grounding. Information Processing & Management 44:957962 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hinze, S., & Schmoch, U. (2005). Opening the black box. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch. (eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 215235). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hu, AGZ, Jaffe, AB 2003 Patent citation and international knowledge flow: The case of Korea and Taiwan. International Journal of Industrial Organization 21 6 849880.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kim, M-J 2007 A bibliometric analysis of the effectiveness of Korea's biotechnology stimulation plans, with a comparison with four other Asian nation. Scientometrics 72 3 371388 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lecocq, C B Van Looy 2009 The impact of collaboration on the technological performance of regions: Time invariant or driven by life cycle dynamics? An explorative investigation of European regions in the field of biotechnology. Scientometrics 80 3 845865 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lee, S, Bozeman, B 2005 The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science 35 5 673702 .

  • Lim, H, Park, Y 2010 Identification of technological knowledge intermediaries. Scientometrics 84:543561 .

  • Liu, XL, White, S 2001 Comparing innovation systems: a framework and application to China's transitional context. Research Policy 30:10911114 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nasir, A., Ali, T. M., Shahdin, S., & Rahman, T. U. (2010). Technology achievement index 2009: Ranking and comparative study of nations. Scientometrics. doi: .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • OECD 2005 A framework for biotechnology statistics OECD Paris.

  • OECD 2008 Compendium of patent statistics OECD Paris.

  • Patra, SK, Chand, P 2005 Biotechnology research profile of India. Scientometrics 63 3 583597 .

  • Podolny, J, Page, K 1998 Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology 24:5776 .

  • Powell, WW 1990 Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behaviour 12:295336.

  • Ramani, SV, Looze, MA 2002 Using patent statistics as knowledge base indicators in the biotechnology sectors: An application to France, Germany and the U.K. Scientometrics 54 3 319346 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yuan, JP, Yue, WP, Su, C et al. 2010 Patent activity on water pollution and treatment in China: A scientometric perspective. Scientometrics 83:639651 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Manuscript submission: http://www.editorialmanager.com/scim/

  • Impact Factor (2019): 2.867
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2019): 1.210
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2019): 106
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Computer Science Apllications
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Library and Information Sciences
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Impact Factor (2018): 2.770
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2018): 1.113
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2018): 95
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q1 Library and Information Sciences
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q1 Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer

Scientometrics
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1978
Volumes
per Year
4
Issues
per Year
12
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0138-9130 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2861 (Online)