View More View Less
  • 1 Dipartimento di Chimica I.F.M. and NIS-Centre of Excellence, Università di Torino, via P. Giuria, 7, 10125 Turin, Italy
  • | 2 National Research Council of Italy, CERIS-CNR, via Real Collegio, 30, 10024 Moncalieri, TO, Italy
Restricted access

Abstract

Nanosciences and nanotechnologies are considered important for the development of science, technology and innovation, and the study of their characters can be a great help to the decisions of policy makers and of practitioners. This work is centred on the issue of the time relations between science and technology/innovation, and in particular on the speed of transfer of science-generated knowledge towards its exploitation in patenting. A methodology based on patent citations is used in order to measure the time lag between cited journal articles and citing patent, and thus the time proximity between the two steps. Keywords regarding nanotechnology/nanoscience items are searched in order to collect data useful for the analysis. Collateral measures, performed on another class of materials and on the spatial origin of citing/cited documents, help giving evidence of the peculiarity of the behaviour and on its nature. The most representative time lag between production of scientific knowledge and its technological exploitation appears being around 3–4 years.

  • Avenel, E, Favier, AV, Ma, S, Mangematin, V, Rieu, C 2007 Diversification and hybridization in firm knowledge bases in nanotechnologies. Research Policy 36 6 864870 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bacchiocchi, E, Montobbio, F 2009 Knowledge diffusion from university and public research. A comparison between US, Japan and Europe using patent citations. The Journal of Technology Transfer 34 2 169181 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Balzani, V 2005 Nanoscience and nanotechnology: A personal view of a chemist. Small 1 3 278283 .

  • Bertinetti, L, Tampieri, A, Landi, E, Ducati, C, Midgley, PA, Coluccia, S et al. 2006 Surface structure hydration, and cationic sites of nanohydroxyapatite: UHR-TEM, IR, and microgravimetric studies. Journal of Physical Chemistry C 111 10 40274035 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Binnig, G, Rohrer, H 1986 Scanning tunnelling microscopy. IBM Journal of Research and Development 30 4 355369.

  • Bonaccorsi, A, Thoma, G 2007 Institutional complementarity and inventive performance in nanoscience and technology. Research Policy 36 6 813831 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bozeman, B, Laredo, P, Mangematin, V 2007 Understanding the emergence and deployment of “nano” S&T. Research Policy 36 6 807812 .

  • Breschi, S, Catalini, C 2010 Tracing the links between science and technology: An exploratory analysis of scientists’ and inventors’ networks. Research Policy 39 1 1426 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Celotti, G, Tampieri, A, Sprio, S, Landi, E, Bertinetti, L, Martra, G et al. 2006 Crystallinity in apatites: how can a truly disordered fraction be distinguished from nanosize crystalline domains?. Journal of Materials Science-Materials in Medicine 17 11 10791087 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Coccia, M., Finardi, U., & Margon, D. (2010). Research trends in nanotechnology studies across geo-economic areas. CERIS-CNR working paper series, WP 05/10.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Coccia, M., Finardi, U., & Margon, D. (2011). Current trends in nanotechnology research across worldwide geo-economic players. Journal of Technology Transfer. doi: .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Criscuolo, P, Verspagen, B 2008 Does it matter where patent citations come from? Inventor vs examiner citations in European patents. Research Policy 37 10 18921908 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dasgupta, P, David, PA 1994 Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy 23 5 487521 .

  • Evangelisti, C, Vitulli, G, Schiavi, S, Vitulli, M, Bertozzi, S, Salvadori, P et al. 2007 Nanoscale Cu supported catalysts in the partial oxidation of cyclohexane with molecular oxygen. Catalysis Letters 116 1-2 5762 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Glänzel, W, Meyer, M 2003 Patents cited in the scientific literature: An exploratory study of “reverse” citation relations. Scientometrics 58 2 415428 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hu, D, Chen, H, Huang, Z, Roco, MC 2007 Longitudinal study on patent citations to academic research articles in nanotechnology (1976–2004). Journal of Nanoparticle Research 9 4 529542 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huang, C, Notten, A, Rasters, N 2011 Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies. The Journal of Technology Transfer 36 2 145172 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hulmann, A, Meyer, M 2003 Publications and patents in nanotechnology. An overview of previous studies and the state of the art. Scientometrics 58 3 507527 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ijiima, S 1991 Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 354 6348 5658 .

  • Islam, N, Miyazaki, K 2010 An empirical analysis of nanotechnology research domains. Technovation 30 4 229237 .

  • Kroto, HW, Heath, JR, O’Brien, SC, Curl, RF, Smalley, RE 1985 C60: Buckminsterfullerene. Nature 318 6042 162163 .

  • Leydesdorff, L 2007 The delineation of nanoscience and nanotechnology in terms of journals and patents: A most recent update. Scientometrics 76 1 159167 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leydesdorff, L, Zhou, P 2007 Nanotechnology as a field of science: Its delineation in terms of journals and patents. Scientometrics 76 3 693713 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Li, X, Chen, H, Huang, Z, Roco, MC 2007 Patent citation network in nanotechnology (1976–2004). Journal of Nanoparticle Research 9 3 337352 .

  • Li, X, Lin, Y, Chen, H, Roco, MC 2007 Worldwide nanotechnology development: A comparative study of USPTO, EPO, and JPO patents (1976–2004). Journal of Nanoparticle Research 9 6 9771002 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meyer, M 2000 Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature. Research Policy 29 3 409434 .

  • Meyer, M 2001 Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology: An exploration of nano-science and nano-technology. Scientometrics 51 1 163183 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meyer, M 2006 Measuring science-technology interaction in the knowledge-driven economy: The case of a small economy. Scientometrics 66 2 425439 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Porter, AL, Youtie, J, Shapira, P, Schoeneck, DJ 2008 Refining search terms for nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 10 5 715728 .

  • Schmoch, U 1993 Tracing the knowledge transfer from science to technology as reflected in patent indicators. Scientometrics 26 1 193211 .

  • Schultz, LI, Joutz, FL 2010 Methods for identifying emerging general purpose technologies: A case study of nanotechnologies. Scientometrics 85 1 155170 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zecchina, A, Groppo, E, Bordiga, S 2007 Selective catalysis and nanoscience: An inseparable pair. Chemistry–A European Journal 13 9 24402460 .

Manuscript submission: http://www.editorialmanager.com/scim/

  • Impact Factor (2019): 2.867
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2019): 1.210
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2019): 106
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Computer Science Apllications
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Library and Information Sciences
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Impact Factor (2018): 2.770
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2018): 1.113
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2018): 95
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q1 Library and Information Sciences
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q1 Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer

Scientometrics
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1978
Volumes
per Year
4
Issues
per Year
12
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0138-9130 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2861 (Online)