View More View Less
  • 1 University Library, Anna University, Chennai 25, India
  • | 2 Anna University, MIT Campus, Chennai 44, India gopallong@gmail.com
  • | 3 Tamil Arasi Publications, Chennai 18, India mnindias@yahoo.com
  • | 4 Department of Library and Information Science, University of Madras, Chennai 5, India beeraka_r@yahoo.co.uk
Restricted access

Abstract

This paper analyses the growth pattern of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology literature in India during 1990–2009 (20 years). The Scopus international multidisciplinary bibliographical database has been used to identify the Indian contributions on the field of nanoscience and nanotechnology. The study measures the performance based on several parameters, country annual growth rate, authorship pattern, collaborative index, collaborative coefficient, modified collaborative coefficient, subject profile, etc. Further the study examines national publication output and impact in terms of average citations per paper, international collaboration output and share, contribution and impact of Indian Institutions and impact of Indian journals.

  • Ajiferuke, I, Burell, O, Tague, J 1988 Collaborative coefficient: A single measure of the collaboration in research. Scientometrics 14:421433 .

  • Alonso, S et al. 2010 hg-index: A new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h- and g-indices. Scientometrics 82:391400 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bassecoulard, E, Lelu, A, Zitt, M 2007 Mapping nanosciences by citation flows: A preliminary analysis. Scientometrics 70 3 859880 .

  • Bhattacharya, S, Nath, P 2002 Using patent statistics as a measure of “technologies assertiveness”? A China-India comparison. Current Science 83 1 2329.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Braun, T, Schubert, AP, Zsindely, S 1997 Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance. Scientometrics 38 2 321325 .

  • Chen, H, Roco, MC 2009 Mapping nanotechnology innovations and knowledge Springer New York, USA 330.

  • Egghe, L 2006 Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics 69 1 131152 .

  • Franks, A 1987 Nanotechnology. Journal of Physics E: Scientific Instruments 20:14421451 .

  • Garg, KC, Pandhi, P 1999 Scientometrics of laser research literature as viewed through, Journal of Current Laser Abstracts. Scientometrics 45:1938 .

  • Garg, KC et al. 2009 Bibliometrics of global malaria vaccine research. Health Information and Libraries Journal 26:2231 .

  • Glanzel, W, Meyer, M M Du Plessis Thijs, B, Magerman, T, Schlemmer, B, Debacker, K, Veugelers, R 2003 Nanotechnology: Analysis of an emerging domain of scientific and technological endeavour Steupunt O&O Staisitieken Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hirsch 2005 An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of National Academic Science, USA 102 46 1656916572 .

  • Huang, Z, Chen, H, Chen, ZK, Roco, M 2004 International nanotechnology development in 2003; country, institution and technology field analysis based on USPTO patent database. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 6 4 325354 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huang, MH, Chiang, LY, Chen, DZ 2003 Constructing a patent citation map using bibliographic coupling: A study of Taiwans high-tech companies. Scientometrics 58 3 458489 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hullmann, A 2007 Measuring and assessing the development of nanotechnology. Scientometrics 70 3 739758 .

  • Hullmann, A, Meyer, M 2003 Publications and patents in the nanotechnology: An overview of previous studies and the state of the art. Scientometrics 58 3 507527 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Igami, M 2008 Exploration of the evolution of nanotechnology via mapping of patent applications. Scientometrics 77 2 289308 .

  • Kostoff, RN, Koytcheff, RG, Lau, CGY 2007 Global nanotechnology research metrics. Scientometrics 70 3 565601 .

  • Kostoff, RN, Stump, JA, Johnson, D, Murday, JS, Lau, CGY, Tolles, WM 2006 The structure and infrastructure of the global nanotechnology literature. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 8 3 301321 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lawani, S. M. (1980). Quality, collaboration and citations in cancer research: A 268 bibliometric study. Ph.D. Dissertation, Florida State University, 395 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leydesdorff, L 2008 The delineation of nanoscience and nanotechnology in terms of journals and patents: A most recent update. Scientometrics 76 1 159167 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leydesdorff, L, Zhou, P 2007 Nanotechnology as a field of science: Its delineation in terms of journals and patents. Scientometrics 70 3 693713 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Li, X, Chen, H, Dang, Y, Lin, Y, Larsen, CA, Roco, MC 2008 A longitudinal analysis of nanotechnology literature 1976–2994. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 10:322 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lin, M-W, Zhang, J 2007 Language trends in nanoscience and technology: The case of Chinese-language publications. Scientometrics 70 3 555564 .

  • Liu, X et al. 2009 Trends for nanotechnology development in China, Russia and India. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 11:18451866 .

  • Mahapatra, M. (1985). On the validity of the theory of exponential growth of scientific literature. In 15th IASLIC conference proceedings, Bangalore, IASLIC, pp 61-70.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meyer, M 2000 Patent citations in a novel field of technology—what can they tell about interactions between emerging communities of science and technology?. Scientometrics 48 2 151178 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meyer, M 2000 Does science push technology? Please citing scientific literature. Research Policy 29 3 409434 .

  • Meyer, M 2000 What is special about patent citations? Differences between scientific and patent citations. Scientometrics 49 1 93123 .

  • Meyer, M 2001 Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology: An exploration of nanoscience and nanotechnology. Scientometrics 51 1 163183 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meyer, M 2007 What do we know about innovation in nanotechnology? Some propositions about an emerging field between hype and path dependency. Scientometrics 70 3 779810 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meyer, M, Persson, O 1998 Nanotechnology-interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application. Scientometrics 42 2 195205 .

  • Meyer, M., Persson, O., & Power, Y. (2001). Nanotechnology expert group and eurotech data mapping excellence in nanotechnologies, EC, DG-research, Preparatory study.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mithal, R., Ahmad, M., & Singh, G. (2005). Citation mapping of published literature on Embelia ribes. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 52 (4), 308316.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mohan, L, Prakasan, ER, Kademani, BS, Surwase, G, Kumar, A, Kumar, V 2010 Research trends in nanoscience and nanotechnology in India. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology 30 2 4058.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nagpaul, PS 1995 Contribution of Indian universities to the mainstream scientific literature, a bibliometric assessment. Scientometrics 32:1136 .

  • Noyons, E. C., Buter, R. K., Hinze, S., Van Raan, A. F. J., Schmoch, U., Heinze, T., & Rangnow, R. (2003). Mapping excellence in science and technology across Eruope: Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, EC, EC-PPN, CT 2002-0001.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Parr, D 2005 Will nanotechnology make the world a better place?. Trends in Biotechnology 23 8 395398 .

  • Pavitt, K 1998 Do patents reflect the useful output of universities?. Research Evaluation 7 2 105111.

  • Pouris, A 2007 Nanoscale research in South Africa: A mapping exercise based on scientometrics. Scientometrics 70 3 541553 .

  • Prathap, G 2010 The 100 most prolific economists using the p-index. Scientometrics 84:167172 .

  • Prathap, G., & Gupta, B. M. (2009). Ranking of Indian engineering and technological institutes for their research performance during 1999-2008. Current Science, 97 (3).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Radrigo, Costas, Maria, Bordons 2008 Is g-index better than h-index? An exploratory study at the individual level. Scientometrics 77 2 267288 .

  • Rajeswari, AR 1996 Indian patent statistics: An analysis. Scientometrics 36 1 109130 .

  • Retrieved from Scopus Info Site on March 2, 2010 http://info.scopus.com.

  • Roco, M. C. (2001). International strategyfor nanotechnology research. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 3 (5-6), 353360.

  • Sangeetha, MA, Chakrabarti, S, Amba, S 1999 Indian leather patents: An analysis. World Patent Information 21 2 6973 .

  • Savanur, K, Srikanth, R 2010 Modified collaborative coefficient: A new measure for quantifying the degree of research collaboration. Scientometrics 84:365371 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schreiber, M 2008 The influence of self-citations corrections on Egghe's g-index. Scientometrics 76 1 187200 .

  • Schultz, L. I., & Joutz, F. L. (2009). Methods for identifying emerging general purpose technologies: A case study of nanotechnologies. Scientometrics. doi: .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schummer, J 2004 Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Scientometrics 59 3 425465 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schummer, J 2007 The global institutionalization of nanotechnology research: A bibliometric approach to the assessment of science policy. Scientometrics 70 3 669692 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Subramanyam, K 1983 Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A review. Journal of Information Science 6:3338 .

  • Takeda, Y et al. 2009 Nanobiotechnology as an emerging research domain from nanotechnology: A bibliometric approach. Scientometrics 80 1 2338 .

  • Tol, R. S. J. (2009). The h-index and its alternatives: An application to the 100 most prolific economists. Scientometrics. doi: .

  • Wilson, C. S. (2001). Informetrics, In M. E. Williams (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34, Medford NJ: Information Today, Inc. for the American Society for Information Science, pp. 3143.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wilson, M, Kannangara, K, Smith, G, Simmons, M, Raguse, B 2002 Nanotechnology: Basic science and emerging technologies Chapman and Hall/CRC Press Boca Raton, FL .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zitt, M, Bassecoulard, E 2006 Delineating complex scientific fields by an hybrid lexical-citation method: An application to nanosciences. Information Processing & Management 42 6 15131531 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Manuscript submission: http://www.editorialmanager.com/scim/

  • Impact Factor (2019): 2.867
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2019): 1.210
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2019): 106
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Computer Science Apllications
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Library and Information Sciences
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Impact Factor (2018): 2.770
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2018): 1.113
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2018): 95
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q1 Library and Information Sciences
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q1 Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer

Scientometrics
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1978
Volumes
per Year
4
Issues
per Year
12
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0138-9130 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2861 (Online)