View More View Less
  • 1 REQUIMTE/Departamento de Química e Bioquímica, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, 687, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
  • | 2 REQUIMTE/Departamento Engenharia Industrial e Gestão, Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade do Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, s/n, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
Restricted access

Abstract

This paper presents the journal relative impact (JRI), an indicator for scientific evaluation of journals. The JRI considers in its calculation the different culture of citations presented by the Web of Science subject categories. The JRI is calculated considering a variable citation window. This citation window is defined taking into account the time required by each subject category for the maturation of citations. The type of document considered in each subject category depends on its outputs in relation to the citations. The scientific performance of each journal in relation to each subject category that it belongs to is considered allowing the comparison of the scientific performance of journals from different fields. The results obtained show that the JRI can be used for the assessment of the scientific performance of a given journal and that the SJR and SNIP should be used to complement the information provided by the JRI. The JRI presents good features as stability over time and predictability.

  • Bergstrom, C 2007 Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals. C&RL News 68 5 314316.

  • Bollen, J, Rodriguez, MA H Van De Sompel 2006 Journal status. Scientometrics 69 3 669687 .

  • Bollen, J H van de Sompel 2008 Usage impact factor: The effects of sample characteristics on usage-based impact metrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 1 136149 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Garfield, E, Sher, IH 1963 New factors in evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing. American Documentation 14 3 195 .

  • Gavel, Y, Iselid, L 2008 Web of Science and Scopus: A journal title overlap study. Online Information Review 32 1 821 .

  • Glanzel, W, Schoepflin, U 1995 A bibliometric study on aging and reception processes of scientific literature. Journal of Information Science 21 1 3753 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gonzalez-Pereira, B, Guerrero-Bote, VP, Moya-Anegon, F 2010 A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator. Journal of Informetrics 4 3 379391 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jacso, P 2005 As we may search–comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases. Current Science 89 9 15371547.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kyvik, S 2003 Changing trends in publishing behaviour among university faculty, 1980–2000. Scientometrics 58 1 3548 .

  • Leydesdorff, L 2007 Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58 9 13031319 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lisee, C, Lariviere, V, Archambault, E 2008 Conference proceedings as a source of scientific information: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 11 17761784 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lloyd, E. (1984). Handbook of applicable mathematics vol. VI, Part B. Statistics (1st ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Lopez-Illescas, C F de Moya-Anegon Moed, HF 2008 Coverage and citation impact of oncological journals in the Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of Informetrics 2 4 304316 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moed, HF 2010 Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics 4 3 265277 .

  • Moed, HF TN Van Leeuwen Reedijk, J 1998 A new classification system to describe the ageing of scientific journals and their impact factors. Journal of Documentation 54 4 387419 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moed, H. F., & Visser, M. S. (2007). Developing bibliometric indicators of research performance in computer science: An exploratory study. Research Report to the Council for Physical Sciences of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research. Hague: Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Murugesan, P, Moravcsik, MJ 1978 Variation of nature of citation measures with journals and scientific specialties. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 29 3 141147 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nederhof, AJ 2005 Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A review. Scientometrics 66 1 81100 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Opthof, T, Leydesdorff, L 2010 Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the cwts (“leiden”) evaluations of research performance. Journal of Informetrics 4 3 423430 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pinski, G, Narin, F 1976 Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications–theory, with application to literature of physics. Information Processing & Management 12 5 297312 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shepherd, PT 2010 The feasibility of developing and implementing journal usage factors: A research project sponsored by UKSG. The Journal of Serials Community 20:117123 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Small, H, Sweeney, E 1985 Clustering the science citation index using co-citations. 1. A comparison of methods. Scientometrics 7 3–6 391409 .

  • Sombatsompop, N, Markpin, T, Yochai, W, Saechiew, M 2005 An evaluation of research performance for different subject categories using impact factor point average (IFPA) index: Thailand case study. Scientometrics 65 3 293305 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TN Van Leeuwen Moed, HF 2002 Development and application of journal impact measures in the Dutch science system. Scientometrics 53 2 249266 .

  • Vieira, ES, Gomes, JANF 2010 Citations to scientific articles: Its distribution and dependence on the article features. Journal of Informetrics 4 1 113 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zitt, M, Small, H 2008 Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting: The audience factor. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 11 18561860 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Manuscript submission: http://www.editorialmanager.com/scim/

  • Impact Factor (2019): 2.867
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2019): 1.210
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2019): 106
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Computer Science Apllications
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Library and Information Sciences
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Impact Factor (2018): 2.770
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2018): 1.113
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2018): 95
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q1 Library and Information Sciences
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q1 Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer

Scientometrics
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1978
Volumes
per Year
4
Issues
per Year
12
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0138-9130 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2861 (Online)