In order to re-categorize the SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR) journals based on Scopus, as well as improve the SJR subject classification scheme, an iterative process built upon reference analysis of citing journals was designed. The first step entailed construction of a matrix containing citing journals and cited categories obtained through the aggregation of cited journals. Assuming that the most representative categories in each journal would be represented by the highest citation values regarding categories, the matrix vectors were reduced using a threshold to discern and discard the weakest relations. The process was refined on the basis of different parameters of a heuristic nature, including (1) the development of several tests applying different thresholds, (2) the designation of a cutoff, (3) the number of iterations to execute, and (4) a manual review operation of a certain amount of multi-categorized journals. Despite certain shortcomings related with journal classification, the method showed a solid performance in grouping journals at a level higher than categories—that is, aggregating journals into subject areas. It also enabled us to redesign the SJR classification scheme, providing for a more cohesive one that covers a good proportion of re-categorized journals.
Chen, CM 2006 CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 3 359–377 .
Chen, CM 2008 Classification of scientific networks using aggregated journal-journal citation relations in the Journal Citation Reports. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 14 2296–2304 .
Elsevier. (2002). Scopus. http://www.scopus.com/home.url. Accessed June 20, 2011.
Glänzel, W, Schubert, A 2003 A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes. Scientometrics 56 3 357–367 .
Glänzel, W, Schubert, A, Czerwon, HJ 1999 An item-by-item subject classification of papers published in multidisciplinary and general journals using reference analysis. Scientometrics 44 3 427–439 .
Glänzel, W, Schubert, A, Schoepflin, U, Czerwon, HJ 1999 An item-by-item subject classification of papers published in journals covered by the SSCI database using reference analysis. Scientometrics 46 3 431–441 .
Gómez, I, Bordons, M, Fernández, MT, Méndez, A 1996 Coping with the problem of subject classification diversity. Scientometrics 35 2 223–235 .
Leydesdorff, L 2002 Dynamic and evolutionary updates of classificatory schemes in scientific journal structures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53 12 987–994 .
López-Illescas, C, Noyons, ECM, Visser, MV, Moya-Anegón, F, Moed, HF 2009 Expansion of scientific journal categories using reference analysis: How can it be done and does it make a difference?. Scientometrics 79 3 473–490 .
Narin, F 1976 Evaluative bibliometrics: The use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity Computer Horizons, Inc. Cherry Hill, NJ.
Narin, F, Carpenter, M, Nancy, C 1972 Interrelationships of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 23 5 323–331 .
Narin, F, Pinski, G, Gee, HH 1976 Structure of the biomedical literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 27 1 25–45 .
Pinski, G, Narin, F 1976 Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics. Information Processing and Management 12 5 297–312 .
Schubert, A, Braun, T 1996 Cross-field normalization of scientometric indicators. Scientometrics 36 3 311–324 .
Scimago Lab. (2007). Scimago Journal & Country Rank. http://www.scimagojr.com/. Accessed June 20, 2011.
Small, H 1999 A passage through science: Crossing disciplinary boundaries. Library Trends 48 1 72–108.
Thomson Reuters. (2010). ISI Web of Science. http://wokinfo.com/products_tools/multidisciplinary/webofscience/. Accessed June 20, 2011.
Weinberg, A 1963 Criteria for scientific choice. Minerva 1 2 159–171 .