Authors:
Yu-Shan Chen Department of Business Administration, National Taipei University, 151, University Rd., San Shia, New Taipei City 237, Taiwan

Search for other papers by Yu-Shan Chen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Chun-Yu Shih Department of Business Administration, National Yunlin University of Science & Technology, Yunlin, Taiwan

Search for other papers by Chun-Yu Shih in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Since the relationship between patents and Tobin's q is confusing, this paper utilizes panel threshold regression model to re-examine the relationship between patent counts/sales and Tobin's q. This study finds out patent citations/sales has a single threshold effect on the relationship between patent counts/sales and Tobin's q in the US pharmaceutical industry. The single threshold value of patent citations/sales is 328.81, and it divides the value of patent citations/sales into two regimes: the first regime (patent citations/sale ≦ 328.81) and the second regime (patent citations/sale > 328.81). The results indicate that patent counts/sales positively affect Tobin's q in the two regimes. In addition, this study demonstrates that the extent of the positive effect of patent counts/sales on Tobin's q is different. This study verifies that patent citations/sales moderates the relationship between patent counts/sales and Tobin's q. Once patent citations/sales is below the threshold value, the extent of the positive relationship between patent counts/sales and Tobin's q is the most. Therefore, this study finds out that the first regime is optimal.

  • Bhat, VN 2005 Patent term extension strategies in the pharmaceutical industry. Pharmaceuticals Policy & Law 6 1 109122.

  • Bloom, N J Van Reenen 2002 Patents, real options and firm performance. Economic Journal 112 478 97116 .

  • Blundell, R, Griffith, R J Van Reenen 1999 Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. Review of Economic Studies 66 228 529554 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bosworth, D, Rogers, M 2001 Market value, R&D and intellectual property: An empirical analysis of large Australian firms. Economic Record 77 239 323337 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brockhoff, K 1991 Competitor technology intelligence in German companies. Industrial Marketing Management 20 2 9198 .

  • Brown, MG, Svenson, RA 1988 Measuring R&D productivity. Research Technology Management 31 4 1115.

  • Cardinal, LB, Hatfield, DE 2000 Internal knowledge generation: The research laboratory and innovative productivity in the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 17 3–4 247271 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chan, KS 1993 Consistency and limiting distribution of the least squares estimator of a threshold autoregressive model. The Annals of Statistics 21:520533 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chan, KS, Tsay, RS 1998 Limiting properties of the least squares estimator of a continuous threshold autoregressive model. Biometrika 85:413426 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, Y-S 2011 Using patent analysis to explore corporate growth. Scientometrics 88 2 433448 .

  • Chen, Y-S, Chang, K-C 2009 Using neural network to analyze the influence of the patent performance upon the market value of the US pharmaceutical companies. Scientometrics 80 3 637655 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, Y-S, Chang, K-C 2010 Analyzing the nonlinear effects of firm size, profitability, and employee productivity on patent citations of the US pharmaceutical companies by using artificial neural network. Scientometrics 82 1 7582 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, Y-S, Chang, K-C 2010 Exploring the nonlinear effects of patent citations, patent share, and relative patent position on market value in the US pharmaceutical industry. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 22 2 153169 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, Y-S, Chang, K-C 2010 The nonlinear nature of the relationships between the patent traits and corporate performance. Scientometrics 82 1 201210 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, Y-S, Chang, K-C 2010 The relationship between a firm's patent quality and its market value—the case of US pharmaceutical industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 77 1 2033 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, Y-S, Chen, B-Y 2011 Utilizing patent analysis to explore the cooperative competition relationship of the two LED companies: Nichia and Osram. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78 2 294302 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dasgupta, P 1988 Patents, priority and imitation or, the economics of races and waiting games. Economic Journal 98 389 6680 .

  • Davies, RB 1977 Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Biometrika 64:247254 .

  • Deng, Z, Lev, B, Narin, F 1999 Science and technology as predictors of stock performance. Financial Analysts Journal 55 3 2032 .

  • Duguet, E, MacGarvie, M 2005 How well do patent citations measure flows of technology? Evidence from French innovation surveys. Economics of Innovation & New Technology 14 5 375393 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ernst, H 1998 Patent portfolios for strategic R&D planning. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 15 4 279308 .

  • Ernst, H 1999 Evaluation of dynamic technological developments by means of patent data K Brockhoff AK Chakrabarti J Hauschildt eds. The dynamics of innovation: Strategic and managerial implications Springer Corporation Berlin.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ernst, H 2001 Patent applications and subsequent changes of performance: Evidence from time-series cross-section analyses on the firm level. Research Policy 30 1 143157 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ernst, H 2003 Patent information for strategic technology management. World Patent Information 25 3 233242 .

  • Ganguli, P 2003 Global pharmaceutical industry: Intellectual wealth and asset protection. International Journal of Technology Management 25 3/4 284313 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gilbert, RJ, Newbery, DMG 1982 Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly. American Economic Review 72 3 514526.

  • Griliches, Z 1981 Market value, R&D, and patents. Economics Letters 7:183187 .

  • Griliches, Z 1987 R&D and productivity: Measurement issues and econometric results. Science 237 4810 3135 .

  • Griliches, Z, Hall, BH, Pakes, A 1991 R&D, patents, and market value revisited: Is there a second (technological opportunity) factor?. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 1 3 183201 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hagedoorn, J, Cloodt, M 2003 Measuring innovative performance: Is there an advantage in using multiple indicators?. Research Policy 32 8 13651379 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hall, BH 1993 The stock market's valuation of R&D investment during the 1980's. American Economic Review 83 2 259264.

  • Hall, BH, Jaffe, A, Trajtenberg, M 2005 Market value and patent citations. The Rand Journal of Economics 36 1 1638.

  • Hansen, BE 1996 Inference when a nuisance parameter is not identified under the null hypothesis. Econometrica 64:413430 .

  • Hansen, BE 1999 Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference. Journal of Econometrics 93 2 345368 .

  • Harhoff, D, Narin, F, Scherer, FM, Vopel, K 1999 Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Review of Economics and Statistics 81 3 511515 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hirschey, M 1982 Intangible capital aspects of advertising and R&D expenditures. Journal of Industrial Economics 30 4 375390 .

  • Hirschey, M, Richardson, VJ 2001 Valuation effects of patent quality: A comparison for Japanese and U.S. firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 9 1 6582 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hirschey, M, Richardson, VJ 2004 Are scientific indicators of patent quality useful to investors?. Journal of Empirical Finance 11 1 91107 .

  • Jaffe, AB 1986 Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market values. American Economic Review 76 5 9841001.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jensen, EJ 1987 Research expenditures and the discovery of new drugs. Journal of Industrial Economics 36 1 8395 .

  • Lanjouw, JO, Schankerman, M 2001 Characteristics of patent litigation: A window on competition. RAND Journal of Economics 32 1 129151 .

  • Lanjouw, JO, Schankerman, M 2004 Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators. Economic Journal 114 495 441465 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lee, YG, Lee, JD, Song, YI, Lee, SJ 2007 An in-depth empirical analysis of patent citation counts using zero-inflated count data model: The case of KIST. Scientometrics 70 1 2739 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lindenberg, EB, Ross, SA 1981 Tobin's q ratio and industrial organization. Journal of Business 54 1 132 .

  • Mansfield, E 1986 Patents and innovation: An empirical study. Management Science 32 2 173181 .

  • Mansfield, E, Schwartz, M, Wagner, S 1981 Imitation costs and patents: An empirical study. Economic Journal 91 364 907918 .

  • Mossinghoff, GJ, Bembelles, T 1996 The importance of intellectual property protection to the American research-intensive pharmaceutical industry. Columbia Journal of World Business 31 1 3848 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schankerman, M, Pakes, A 1986 Estimates of the value of patent rights in European Countries during the post-1950 period. Economic Journal 96 384 10521076 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Slaughter, D 2002 Patenting activity as an indicator of revenue growth: Five industries. Patent Journal 1 7 410.

  • Tong, H. (1983). Threshold models in non-linear time series analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag Press.

  • Tancer, RS 1995 Trends in worldwide intellectual property protection: The case of the pharmaceutical patent. The International Executive 37 2 147166 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Teece, DJ 1986 Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy 15 6 285305 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Toivanen, O, Stoneman, P, Bosworth, D 2002 Innovation and the market value of UK Firms, 1989–1995. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 64 1 3961 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Trajtenberg, M 1990 A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. The Rand Journal of Economics 21 1 172187 .

  • Trajtenberg, M 2001 Innovation in Israel 1968–1997: A comparative analysis using patent data. Research Policy 30 3 363389 .

  • Yang, C-H, Chen, J-R 2003 Innovation and market value in newly-industrialized countries: The case of Taiwanese electronics firms. Asian Economic Journal 17 2 205220 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collapse
  • Expand

To see the editorial board, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Manuscript submission: http://www.editorialmanager.com/scim/

For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Scientometrics
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1978
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
12
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0138-9130 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2861 (Online)