Citation frequency is often used in hiring and tenure decisions as an indicator of the quality of a researcher's publications. In this paper, we examine the influence of discipline, institution, journal impact factor, length of article, number of authors, seniority of author, and gender on citation rate of top-cited papers for academic faculty in geography and forestry departments. Self-citation practices and patterns of citation frequency across post-publication lifespan were also examined. Citation rates of the most-highly cited paper for all tenured forestry (N = 122) and geography (N = 91) faculty at Auburn University, Michigan State University, Northern Arizona University, Oklahoma State University, Pennsylvania State University, Texas A&M University, University of Florida, University of Massachusetts, University of Washington, and Virginia Tech were compared. Foresters received significantly more citations than geographers (t = 2.46, P = 0.02) and more senior authors received more citations than junior researchers (r2 = 0.14, P = 0.03). Articles published in journals with higher impact factors also received more citations (r2 = 0.28, P = 0.00). The median self-citation rate was 10% and there was no temporal pattern to the frequency of citations received by an individual article (x2 = 176). Our results stress the importance of only comparing citation rates within a given discipline and confirm the importance of author-seniority and journal rankings as factors that influence citation rate of a given article.
Castellano, C, Radicchi, F2009On the fairness of using relative indicators for comparing citation performance in different disciplines. Archivum Immunologiae et therapiae Experimentalis57285–9010.1007/s00005-009-0014-0.)| false
Chen, C, Sun, K, Wu, G, Tang, Q, Qin, J, Chiu, K, Fu, Y, Wang, X, Liu, J2009The impact of internet resources on scholarly communication: A citation analysis. Scientometrics812459–47410.1007/s11192-008-2180-y.)| false
Copenheaver, CA, Goldbeck, K, Cherubini, P2010Lack of gender bias in citation rates of publications by dendrochronologists: What is unique about this discipline?. Tree-Ring Research662127–13310.3959/2009-10.1.)| false
MacRoberts, MH, MacRoberts, BR1989Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science405342–34910.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198909)40:5<342::AID-ASI7>3.0.CO;2-U.)| false
Parker, JN, Lortie, C, Allesina, S2010Characterizing a scientific elite: The social characteristics of the most highly cited scientists in environmental science and ecology. Scientometrics851129–14310.1007/s11192-010-0234-4.)| false
Penas, CS, Willett, P2006Gender differences in publication and citation counts in librarianship and information science research. Journal of Information Science325480–48510.1177/0165551506066058.)| false
Seglen, PO1994Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science4511–1110.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199401)45:1<1::AID-ASI1>3.0.CO;2-Y.)| false
Steininger, K, Riedl, R, Roithmayr, F, Mertens, P2009Fads and trends in business and information systems engineering and information systems research—A comparative literature analysis. Business and Information Systems Engineering16411–428.
Steininger, K, Riedl, R, Roithmayr, F, Mertens, P2009Fads and trends in business and information systems engineering and information systems research—A comparative literature analysis. Business and Information Systems Engineering16411–42810.1007/s12599-009-0079-7.)| false
Symonds, MRE, Gemmell, NJ, Braisher, TL, Gorringe, KL, Elgar, MA2006Gender differences in publication output: Towards an unbiased metric of research performance. PloS One11e12710.1371/journal.pone.0000127.)| false
Zucker, LG, Darby, MR1996Star scientists and institutional transformation: Patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences932312709–12716.
Zucker, LG, Darby, MR1996Star scientists and institutional transformation: Patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences932312709–1271610.1073/pnas.93.23.12709.)| false