View More View Less
  • 1 Program of Regional Information, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, San 56-1 Sillim-dong, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 151-742, Korea
  • | 2 Department of International Trade, Konkuk University, 1 Hwayang-dong, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, Korea
  • | 3 Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, 108 Yangjaedaero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Korea
Restricted access

Abstract

In this paper, the agricultural innovation systems of two Northeast Asian countries—Korea and China—are investigated and compared from the perspective of triple helix innovation. Specifically, the current study examines the nature of agricultural innovation of the two countries and considers agricultural R&D investments and activities as well as the roles of university, industry, and government (UIG), which are the three units comprising the triple helix. As an empirical extension of the qualitative analysis, we collected bibliometric information of agricultural scientific publications from 1990 to 2010 and patent information from 1980 to 2010. By calculating transmission of uncertainty, which indicates collaboration among UIG, this paper tracks the relationship dynamics of the units comprising the triple helix. In addition, we analyze topics in scientific publications and patents in order to observe and compare the subareas that are the focus in the two countries. The findings reveal both commonalities and differences between the two countries, thus providing knowledge of and insights into the agricultural sector.

  • Bae, S, Yong, T 2011 Recent trend and implications of government R&D expenditure in main developed countries and Korea Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning Seoul.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Beghin, JC, Bureau, JC, Park, SJ 2003 Food security and agricultural protection in South Korea. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85 3 618632 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Colby, H., Diao, X., & Somwaru, A. (2000). Cross-commodity analysis of China's grain sector: Sources of growth and supply response. Technical Bulletins. U.S. Department of Agriculture.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Danell, R, Persson, O 2003 Regional R&D activities and interactions in the Swedish Triple Helix. Scientometrics 58 2 203218 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diao, X, Somwaru, A, Roe, T 2001 A global analysis of agricultural reform in WTO member countries. Background paper for a USDA project on Agricultural Policy Reform in the WTO: The Road Ahead, ERS-E01-001 US Department of Agriculture Washington, DC.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Etzkowitz, H 2003 Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Social Science Information 42 3 293 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Etzkowitz, H, Leydesdorff, L 2000 The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode. 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy 29 2 109123 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fan, S, Pardey, PG 1997 Research, productivity, and output growth in Chinese agriculture. Journal of Development Economics 53 1 115137 .

  • Goktepe, D 2003 The Triple Helix as a model to analyze Israeli Magnet Program and lessons for late-developing countries like Turkey. Scientometrics 58 2 219239 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Grupp, H 1990 The concept of entropy in scientometrics and innovation research. Scientometrics 18 3 219239 .

  • Jin, S, Ma, H, Huang, J, Hu, R, Rozelle, S 2010 Productivity, efficiency and technical change: measuring the performance of China's transforming agriculture. Journal of Productivity Analysis 33 3 191207 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kang, IS, Song, Y 2004 Liberalization of the agricultural sector in northeast Asia: The effects of the Doha Development Agenda*. Asian Economic Papers 3 2 99122 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Korea Rural Economic Institute (2010). Agricultural Policy in China. Korea Rural Economic Institute. Press Release, 17 February 2011.

  • Latour, B. (1988). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Leydesdorff, L 2000 The triple helix: An evolutionary model of innovations. Research Policy 29 2 243255 .

  • Leydesdorff, L 2003 Can “The Public” be considered as a fourth helix in University–Industry–Government relations?. Science and Public Policy 30 1 5561 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leydesdorff, L, Sun, Y 2009 National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University–industry–government versus international coauthorship relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 4 778788 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leydesdorff, L, Zawdie, G 2010 The triple helix perspective of innovation systems. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 22 7 789804 .

  • Lohmar, B., Gale, F., Tuan, F., & Hansen, J. (2009). China's ongoing agricultural modernization: Challenges remain after 30 years of reform. USDA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ma, X. (2010). The present situation and future strategy of food security in China. Paper presented at the 5th forum for China-Korea Agricultural Cooperation, Beijing, December 2010.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Korea (2009). The 1st Five-year Plan of Promoting Science & Technology in Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Press Release, 23 December 2009.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Park, HW, Hong, HD, Leydesdorff, L 2005 A comparison of the knowledge-based innovation systems in the economies of South Korea and the Netherlands using Triple Helix indicators. Scientometrics 65 1 327 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pretty, JN, Ball, AS, Xiaoyun, L, Ravindranath, N 2002 The role of sustainable agriculture and renewable-resource management in reducing greenhouse-gas emissions and increasing sinks in China and India. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 360 1797 1741 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Razak, AA, Saad, M 2007 The role of universities in the evolution of the Triple Helix culture of innovation network: The case of Malaysia. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development 6 3 211225 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rivera, MI 2006 The foreign factor within the Triple Helix model: Interactions of national and international innovation systems, technology transfer and implications for the region: The case of the electronics cluster in Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation 1 4 1021.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Saad, M, Zawdie, G 2005 From technology transfer to the emergence of a triple helix culture: The experience of Algeria in innovation and technological capability development. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 17 1 89103 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Saviotti, PP 1988 Information, variety and entropy in technoeconomic development. Research Policy 17 2 89103 .

  • Shannon, CE 1948 A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27 379 623.

  • Shen, X 2010 Understanding the evolution of rice technology in China—from traditional agriculture to GM rice today. Journal of Development Studies 46 6 10261046 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sun, Y, Negishi, M 2010 Measuring the relationships among university, industry and other sectors in Japan's national innovation system: a comparison of new approaches with mutual information indicators. Scientometrics 82 3 677685 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Theil, H 1972 Statistical decomposition analysis North-Holland Amsterdam.

  • Toffler, A, Longul, W, Forbes, H 1981 The third wave Bantam Books New York.

  • Wasserman, S 1994 Social network analysis: Methods and applications Cambridge University Press Cambridge.