Author:
Author:
Matthew A. Shapiro
Matthew A. Shapiro
Illinois Institute of Technology, Siegel Hall, Suite 116, 3301 S. Dearborn Street, Chicago, IL 60616, USA
Search for other papers by Matthew A. Shapiro in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Matthew A. Shapiro in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
This article examines the incentive structure underlying information transfers received by the three key players of the Triple Helix paradigm: universities, industry, and government research institutes (GRIs). For Korea and Taiwan, which are the cases under analysis here, such an empirical examination has not yet been conducted on a quantitative level. Using a unique dataset of survey responses from a maximum of 325 researchers based in Korean and Taiwanese universities, industry, and GRIs, this article shows that there are some significant differences between and within countries. Most importantly, policy interventions to promote university-industry-GRI interactions impact the degree to which specific information transfers are considered useful. In Korea, formal transfers are emphasized, while both formal and, in particular, informal transfers are emphasized in Taiwan.
ProCite
RefWorks
Reference Manager
BibTeX
Zotero
EndNote
-
Adams, JD, Chiang, EP, Starkey, K 2001 Industry–university cooperative research centers. Journal of Technology Transfer 26 1–2 73–86 .
-
Aldrich, JH, Nelson, FD 1984 Linear probability, logit, and probit models Sage Publications Newbury Park.
-
Amemiya, T 1985 Advanced econometrics Harvard University Press Cambridge.
-
Amsden, A 1989 Asia's next giant: South Korea and late industrialization Oxford University Press New York.
-
S Berger KR Lester eds. 2005 Global Taiwan: Building competitive strengths in the new economy M.E. Sharpe New York.
-
Bernstein, JI, Nadiri, MI 1988 Interindustry R&D spillovers, rates of return, and production in high-tech industries. American Economic Review 78 2 429–434.
-
Branscomb, LM, Keller, JH 1998 Towards a research and innovation policy LM Branscomb JH Keller eds. Investing in innovation: Creating a research and innovation policy that works MIT Press Cambridge.
-
Branstetter, L., & Sakakibara, M. (1997). Japanese research consortia: A microeconometric analysis of industrial policy. NBER Working Paper No. 6066. NBER, Cambridge.
-
Breschi, S., & Catalini, C. (2010). Tracing the links between science and technology: An exploratory analysis of scientists’ and inventors’ networks. Research Policy, 39 (1), 14–26. doi: .
-
Breznitz, D 2005 Development, flexibility, and R&D performance in the Taiwanese IT industry—capability creation and the effects of state-industry co-evolution. Industrial and Corporate Change 14 1 153–187 .
-
Cassiman, B., Veugelers, R., & Zuniga, P. (2008). In search of performance effects of (in)direct industry science links. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17 (4), 611–646. doi: .
-
Cheng, T-J, Haggard, S, Kang, D 1998 Institutions and growth in Korea and Taiwan: The bureaucracy. Journal of Development Studies 34 6 87–111 .
-
Cohen, WM, Florida, R, Randazzese, L, Walsh, J 1998 Industry and the academy: Uneasy partners in the cause of technological advance RG Noll eds. Challenges to research universities The Brookings Institution Washington, D.C..
-
Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48 (1), 1–23.
-
Dasgupta, P, Maskin, E 1987 The simple economics of research portfolios. The Economic Journal 97:581–595 .
-
D’Aspremont, C, Jacquemin, A 1988 Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers. American Economic Review 78 5 1133–1137.
-
David, PA, Foray, D 1996 Information distribution and the growth of economically valuable knowledge: A rationale for technological infrastructure policies M Teubal D Foray M Justman E Zuscovitch eds. Technological infrastructure policy: An international perspective Kluwer Academic Publishers New York 87–116.
-
David, PA, Hall, BH, Toole, AA 2000 Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy 29 4–5 497–529 .
-
Etzkowitz, H 2003 Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Social Science Information 42 3 293–337 .
-
Etzkowitz, H 2008 Triple helix innovation: Industry, university, and government in action Routledge London .
-
Etzkowitz, H, Leydesdorff, L 2000 The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy 29 2 109–123 .
-
Evans, PB 1998 Transferable lessons? Re-examining the institutional prerequisites of East Asian economic policies. Journal of Development Studies 34 6 66–86 .
-
Fontana, R., Guena, A., & Mireille, M. (2003). Firm size and openness: The driving forces of university-industry collaboration. A report commissioned by the OST-DTI, SPRU, University of Sussex, Brighton. http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Users/prff0/mainpages/home.html.
-
Fritsch, M. & Schwirten, C. (1999). Enterprise-university co-operation and the role of public research institutions in regional innovation systems. Industry and Innovation, 6 (1), 69–83.
-
Griliches, Z. (1998). The search for R&D spillovers. In R&D and productivity: The econometric evidence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-
Hagedoorn, J, Link, A, Vonortas, NS 2000 Research partnerships. Research Policy 29:567–586 .
-
Hall, B. H., Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2000). Universities as Research Partners, NBER Working Paper No. 7643. NBER, Cambridge.
-
Hamilton, GG, Biggart, NW 1988 Market, culture, and authority: A comparative analysis of management and organization in the far east. American Journal of Sociology 94 Supplement S52–S94 .
-
Han, Y. (2001). What drives R&D alliances? Evidence from the biotechnology industry. Ph.D. Dissertation. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.
-
L-M Hsueh C-k Hsu DH Perkins eds. 2001 Industrialization and the state: The changing role of government in Taiwan's economy, 1945–1998 Harvard Institute for International Development Cambridge.
-
Hu, M.-C. (2011). Evolution of knowledge creation and diffusion: The revisit of Taiwan's Hsinchu science park. Scientometrics, 88 (3), 949–977.
-
Hu, M-C, Mathews, JA 2009 Estimating the innovation effects of university-industry-government linkages: The case of Taiwan. Journal of Management and Organization 15 2 138–154 .
-
Jaffe, AB 1998 The importance of ‘Spillovers’ in the policy mission of the advanced technology program. Journal of Technology Transfer 23 2 11–19 .
-
Johnson, C 1982 MITI and the Japanese miracle: The growth of industrial policy, 1925–1975 Stanford University Press Stanford.
-
Joly, PB, Mangamatin, V 1996 Profile of public laboratories, industrial partnerships and organisation of R&D: The dynamics of industrial relationships in a large research organisation. Research Policy 25 6 901–922 .
-
Kim, H, Park, Y 2008 The impact of R&D collaboration on innovative performance in Korea: A Bayesian network approach. Scientometrics 75 3 535–554 .
-
Lécuyer, C 1998 Academic science and technology in the service of industry: MIT creates a “Permeable” engineering school. AEA Papers and Proceedings: Clio and the Economic Organization of Science 88 2 28–33.
-
Lee, W-Y 2000 the role of science and technology policy in Korea's industrial development L Kim RR Nelson eds. Technology learning and innovation: Experiences of newly industrializing economies Cambridge University Press Cambridge.
-
Leydesdorff, L 2006 The knowledge-based economy and the triple helix model W Dolfsma L Soete eds. Understanding the dynamics of a knowledge economy Edward Elgar Cheltenham.
-
Manjarres-Henriquez, L, Gutierrez-Gracia, A, Vega-Jurado, J 2008 Coexistence of university–industry relations and academic research: Barrier to or incentive for scientific productivity. Scientometrics 76 3 561–576 .
-
McKelvey, RD, Zavoina, W 1975 A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 4 1 103–120 .
-
Mowery, DC, Nelson, RR, Sampat, BN, Ziedonis, AA 2004 Ivory tower and industrial innovation: Univeristy–industry technology transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States Stanford Business Books Stanford.
-
Nelson, RR, Rosenberg, N 1993 Technical innovation and national systems RR Nelson eds. National innovation systems: A comparative analysis Oxford University Press New York.
-
OECD 2004 OECD science, technology and industry outlook 2004 OECD Paris and Washington, D.C. .
-
OECD. (2006). Main science and technology indicators (MSTI). www.sourceoecd.org. Accessed on 24 July 2006.
-
Park, YC 1990 Development lessons from Asia: The role of government in South Korea and Taiwan. American Economic Review 80 2 118–121.
-
Park, HW, Hong, HD, Leydesdorff, L 2005 A comparison of the knowledge-based innovation systems in the economies of South Korea and the Netherlands using triple helix indicators. Scientometrics 65 1 3–27 .
-
Rahm, D, Kirkland, J, Bozeman, B 1999 University–industry R&D collaboration in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan Kluwer Academic Publishers New York.
-
Rinia, E T van Leeuwen Bruins, E H van Vuren A van Raan 2002 Measuring knowledge transfer between fields of science. Scientometrics 54 3 347–362 .
-
Roos, D, Field, F, Neely, J 1998 Industry consortia LM Branscomb JH Keller eds. Investing in innovation: Creating a research and innovation policy that works MIT Press Cambridge.
-
Ruegg, R, Feller, I 2003 A toolkit for evaluating public R&D investment: Models, methods, and findings from ATP's first decade National Institute of Standards and Technology & U.S. Department of Commerce Washington, D.C..
-
Sakakibara, M. (1994). Cooperative research and development: Theory and evidence on Japanese practice. Doctoral Dissertation. Harvard: Harvard University.
-
Scott, A., Steyn, G., Guena, A., Brusoni, S., & Steinmueller, E. (2001). The economic returns to basic research and the benefits of university-industry relationships: A literature review and update of findings. A report commissioned by the OST-DTI, SPRU, University of Sussex, Brighton. http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Users/prff0/mainpages/home.html.
-
Shapiro, MA 2007 The triple helix paradigm in Korea: A test for new forms of capital. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development 6 3 171–191 .
-
Stiglitz, JE, Jayadev, A 2010 Medicine for tomorrow: Some alternative proposals to promote socially beneficial research and development in pharmaceuticals. Journal of 7 3 217–226 .
-
Stiglitz, JE, Wallsten, SJ 1999 Public-private technology partnerships: Promises and pitfalls. American Behavioral Scientist 43 1 52–73 .
-
Wade, R 1990 Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization Princeton University Press Princeton.
-
World Bank 1993 The East Asian miracle: Economic growth and public policy World Bank, Oxford University Press New York.
-
Zhang, L, Glänzel, W, Liang, L 2009 Tracing the role of individual journals in a cross-citation network based on different indicators. Scientometrics 81 3 821–838 .
To see the editorial board, please visit the website of Springer Nature.
Manuscript submission: http://www.editorialmanager.com/scim/
For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer Nature.
| Scientometrics | |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Size | B5 |
| Year of Foundation |
1978 |
| Volumes per Year |
1 |
| Issues per Year |
12 |
| Founder | Akadémiai Kiadó |
| Founder's Address |
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245. |
| Publisher | Akadémiai Kiadó Springer Nature Switzerland AG |
| Publisher's Address |
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245. CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11. |
| Responsible Publisher |
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó |
| ISSN | 0138-9130 (Print) |
| ISSN | 1588-2861 (Online) |
Monthly Content Usage
| Abstract Views | Full Text Views | PDF Downloads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2024 | 31 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan 2025 | 48 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 2025 | 46 | 0 | 0 |
| Mar 2025 | 56 | 0 | 0 |
| Apr 2025 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| May 2025 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Jun 2025 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Copyright Akadémiai Kiadó AKJournals is the trademark of Akadémiai Kiadó's journal publishing business branch.
Powered by PubFactory