View More View Less
  • 1 Skidmore College, 815 N. Broadway, Saratoga Springs, NY, USA
  • 2 University of Campinas, Av. Albert Einstein, 1251 Campinas, SP, Brazil rocha@ic.unicamp.brwainer@ic.unicamp.br
Restricted access

Abstract

In computer science, as opposed to many other disciplines, papers published in conference and workshop proceedings count as formal publications when evaluating the scholarship of an academic. We consider the relationship between high quality journals and conferences in the computer vision (CV) subfield of computer science. We determined that 30% of papers in the top-3 CV journals base their work on top-3 conference papers by the same authors (which we call priors (See “” section for the definition of a prior)). Journal papers with priors are significantly more cited than journal papers without priors. Also the priors themselves are cited more than other papers from the conferences. For a period of 3–5 years after the journal paper publication, the priors receive more citations than the follow-up journal paper. After that period, the journal paper starts receiving most of the citations. Furthermore, we found that having the prior conference paper did not make it any easier (faster) to publish in a journal. We also surveyed journal authors and based on their answers and the priors analysis, we discovered that authors seem to be divided into different groups depending on their preferred method of publication.

  • Franceschet, M. 2010 The role of conference publications in computer science: A bibliometric view. Communications of the ACM 53 12 129132 .

  • Franceschet, M. 2011 The skewness of computer science. Information Processing and Management 47:117124 .

  • Franceschet, M., Costantini, A. 2011 The first italian research assessment exercise: A bibliometric perspective. Journal of Infometrics 5 2 275291 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Freyne, J., Coyle, L., Smyth, B., Cunningham, P. 2010 Relative status of journal and conference publications in computer science. Communications of the ACM 53 11 124132 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goodrum, A., McCain, K. W., Lawrence, S., Giles, C. L. 2001 Scholarly publishing in the internet age: A citation analysis of computer science literature. Information Processing and Management 37:661675 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kling, R., McKim, G. 1999 Scholarly communication and the continuum of electronic publishing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST) 50 10 890906 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martins, W., Gonalves, M., Laender, A., Ziviani, N. 2010 Assessing the quality of scientific conferences based on bibliographic citations. Scientometrics 83:133155 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Montesi, M., Owen, J. M. 2008 From conference to journal publication: How conference papers in software engineering are extended for publication in journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST) 59 5 816826 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shamir, L. (2010). The effect of conference proceedings on the scholarly communication in computer science and engineering. Scholarly and Research Communication, 1 (2), 17.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stringer, M. J., Sales-Pardo, M., Nunes Amaral, L. A. 2008 Effectiveness of journal ranking schemes as a tool for locating information. PLoS ONE 3 2 e1683,02 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wainer, J. H. P. de Oliveira Anido, R. 2011 Patterns of bibliographic references in the acm published papers. Information Processing & Management 47 1 135142 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation