Based on the fact that in terms of research productivity, performance of women is weaker than men's, and because little is known on the factors affecting academic women's productivity in Iran, the present article aims to study factors affecting research productivity of Iranian women in ISI. To do this, at first, women who have already had published documents indexed in ISI were identified through Web of Science. Afterwards, in order to collect their view regarding factors affecting women's research productivity, a researcher-made questionnaire was used. To analyze the collected data, the statistical software SPSS (version 17) was used. Both descriptive (Percentage and Frequency) and inferential (ANOVA) statistics were employed to reach valid findings. The findings indicate that the most motivational factors affecting positively publishing scholarly articles by Iranian women are ‘Getting promoted in scientific rank’, ‘Intrinsic talents’, ‘Perseverance and adventitious knowledge’, ‘Feeling of being useful in society’, ‘Getting promoted in job’, ‘Being encouraged by friends and family’, ‘Religious lessons regarding the importance of science’, and ‘Attempt to show individual capabilities’. Finally, some remarks for the improvement of the current condition are highlighted.
Abramo, G, D’Angelo, CA, Caprasecca, A 2009 Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric survey on the Italian academic system. Scientometrics 79 3 517–539 .
Babu, AR, Singh, YP 1998 Determinants of research productivity. Scientometrics 43 3 309–329 .
Barzebat, DA 2006 Gender differences in research patterns among PhD economists. Journal of Economic Education 37 3 359–375 .
Bihar al-Anwar (2001). In Jami’ al-Ahadith CD-ROM. 1 ed. Qom: Noor Publication. (In Persian).
Bloedel, J. R. (2001). Judging research productivity on an entrepreneurial campusé. Evaluation Research Productivity, 105. http://merrill.ku.edu/publications/2001whitepaper/bloedel.html.
Cole, JR, Zuckerman, H 1984 The productivity puzzle: Persistence and change in patterns of publication among men and women scientists MW Steimkamp M Maehr eds. Advances in motivation and achievement 2 JAI Press Greenwich, CT.
Creswell, JW, Bean, JP 1981 Research output, socialization and the Biglan model. Research in Higher Education 15 1 69–89 .
Davenport, H, Snyder, H 1995 Who cites women. Whom do women cite: An exploration of gender and scholarly citation in sociology. Journal of Documentation 51 4 404–410 .
Ding, WW, Murray, F, Stuart, TE 2006 Gender differences in patenting in the academic life sciences. Science 313 5787 665–667 .
Ferber, MA 1986 Citations: Are they an objective measure of scholarly merit?. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 11 2 281–289 .
Fonseca, L, Velloso, S, Wofchuck, S L De Meis 1997 The importance of human relationships in scientific productivity. Scientometrics 39 2 159–171 .
Fox, MF 2005 Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science 35 1 131–150 .
Hedjazi, Y., & Behravan, J. (2011). Study of factors influencing research productivity of agriculture faculty members in Iran. Higher Education, http://www.springerlink.com/content/31p17x1uv547078w/.
Hüsing, T., & Selhofer, H. (2002). The digital divide index—a measure of social inequalities in the adoption of ICT. Paper presented at ECIS, Gdansk, June 6-8, http://www.empirica.com/publikationen/documents/2002/Huesing_Selhofer_DDIX_2002.pdf.
Kotrlik, JW, Bartlett, JE, Higgins, CC, Williams, HA 2002 Factors associated with research productivity of agricultural education faculty. Journal of Agricultural Education 43 3 1–10 .
Larivière, V, Vignola-Gagné, E, Villeneuve, C, Gélinas, P, Gingras, Y 2011 Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact: An analysis of Québec university professors. Scientometrics 87 3 483–498 .
Leta, J 2003 The contribution of women in Brazilian science: A case study in astronomy, immunology and oceanography. Scientometrics 57 3 339–353 .
Long, JS 1992 Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity. Social Forces 71 1 159–178.
Manjunath, L., & Shashidahra, K. K. (2011). Determinates of scientific productivity of Agricultural scientists. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 11 (1), 7–12. http://www.seea.org.in/vol11-1-2011/02.pdf.
Mozaffarian, M, Jamali, HR 2008 Iranian women in science: A gender study of scientific productivity in an Islamic country. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives 60 5 463–473.
Nahj al-Fasahah. (2005). Sayings and traditions of Prophet Muhammad. Collected by Ali Shirvani. Qom: Dar al-Fekr Publication. (In Persian).
Parker, JN, Lortie, C, Allesina, S 2010 Characterizing a scientific elite: The social characteristics of the most highly cited scientists in environmental science and ecology. Scientometrics 85 1 129–143 .
Stack, S 2004 Gender, children and research productivity. Research in Higher Education 45 8 891–920 .
Tasviri-Ghamsari, F, Jahannama, M 2008 Studying scientific productivity of researchers at Engineering Research Institute. Librarianship and Information Science (an Iranian Journal) 10 2 63–79.
Teodorescu, D 2000 Correlates of faculty publication productivity: A cross-national analysis. Higher Education 39:201–222 .
Wichian, S. N., Wongwanich, S., & Bowarnkitiwong, S. (2009). Factors affecting research productivity of faculty members in government universities: Lisrel and neural network analyses. http://kasetsartjournal.ku.ac.th/kuj_files/2009/A0906251543307343.pdf.
Xie, Y, Shauman, K 1999 Commentary: Gender differences in research productivity. The Scientist 13 19 10.