Authors:
Alireza Isfandyari-Moghaddam Department of Library and Information Studies, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran

Search for other papers by Alireza Isfandyari-Moghaddam in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Mohammad Hasanzadeh Department of Library and Information Science, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

Search for other papers by Mohammad Hasanzadeh in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Zainab Ghayoori Department of Library and Information Science, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

Search for other papers by Zainab Ghayoori in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Based on the fact that in terms of research productivity, performance of women is weaker than men's, and because little is known on the factors affecting academic women's productivity in Iran, the present article aims to study factors affecting research productivity of Iranian women in ISI. To do this, at first, women who have already had published documents indexed in ISI were identified through Web of Science. Afterwards, in order to collect their view regarding factors affecting women's research productivity, a researcher-made questionnaire was used. To analyze the collected data, the statistical software SPSS (version 17) was used. Both descriptive (Percentage and Frequency) and inferential (ANOVA) statistics were employed to reach valid findings. The findings indicate that the most motivational factors affecting positively publishing scholarly articles by Iranian women are ‘Getting promoted in scientific rank’, ‘Intrinsic talents’, ‘Perseverance and adventitious knowledge’, ‘Feeling of being useful in society’, ‘Getting promoted in job’, ‘Being encouraged by friends and family’, ‘Religious lessons regarding the importance of science’, and ‘Attempt to show individual capabilities’. Finally, some remarks for the improvement of the current condition are highlighted.

  • Abramo, G, D’Angelo, CA, Caprasecca, A 2009 Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric survey on the Italian academic system. Scientometrics 79 3 517539 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Babu, AR, Singh, YP 1998 Determinants of research productivity. Scientometrics 43 3 309329 .

  • Barzebat, DA 2006 Gender differences in research patterns among PhD economists. Journal of Economic Education 37 3 359375 .

  • Bihar al-Anwar (2001). In Jami’ al-Ahadith CD-ROM. 1 ed. Qom: Noor Publication. (In Persian).

  • Bloedel, J. R. (2001). Judging research productivity on an entrepreneurial campusé. Evaluation Research Productivity, 105. http://merrill.ku.edu/publications/2001whitepaper/bloedel.html.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cole, JR, Zuckerman, H 1984 The productivity puzzle: Persistence and change in patterns of publication among men and women scientists MW Steimkamp M Maehr eds. Advances in motivation and achievement 2 JAI Press Greenwich, CT.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Creswell, JW, Bean, JP 1981 Research output, socialization and the Biglan model. Research in Higher Education 15 1 6989 .

  • Davenport, H, Snyder, H 1995 Who cites women. Whom do women cite: An exploration of gender and scholarly citation in sociology. Journal of Documentation 51 4 404410 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ding, WW, Murray, F, Stuart, TE 2006 Gender differences in patenting in the academic life sciences. Science 313 5787 665667 .

  • Ferber, MA 1986 Citations: Are they an objective measure of scholarly merit?. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 11 2 281289 .

  • Fonseca, L, Velloso, S, Wofchuck, S L De Meis 1997 The importance of human relationships in scientific productivity. Scientometrics 39 2 159171 .

  • Fox, MF 2005 Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science 35 1 131150 .

  • Hedjazi, Y., & Behravan, J. (2011). Study of factors influencing research productivity of agriculture faculty members in Iran. Higher Education, http://www.springerlink.com/content/31p17x1uv547078w/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hüsing, T., & Selhofer, H. (2002). The digital divide index—a measure of social inequalities in the adoption of ICT. Paper presented at ECIS, Gdansk, June 6-8, http://www.empirica.com/publikationen/documents/2002/Huesing_Selhofer_DDIX_2002.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kotrlik, JW, Bartlett, JE, Higgins, CC, Williams, HA 2002 Factors associated with research productivity of agricultural education faculty. Journal of Agricultural Education 43 3 110 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Larivière, V, Vignola-Gagné, E, Villeneuve, C, Gélinas, P, Gingras, Y 2011 Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact: An analysis of Québec university professors. Scientometrics 87 3 483498 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leta, J 2003 The contribution of women in Brazilian science: A case study in astronomy, immunology and oceanography. Scientometrics 57 3 339353 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Long, JS 1992 Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity. Social Forces 71 1 159178.

  • Manjunath, L., & Shashidahra, K. K. (2011). Determinates of scientific productivity of Agricultural scientists. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 11 (1), 712. http://www.seea.org.in/vol11-1-2011/02.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mozaffarian, M, Jamali, HR 2008 Iranian women in science: A gender study of scientific productivity in an Islamic country. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives 60 5 463473.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nahj al-Fasahah. (2005). Sayings and traditions of Prophet Muhammad. Collected by Ali Shirvani. Qom: Dar al-Fekr Publication. (In Persian).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Parker, JN, Lortie, C, Allesina, S 2010 Characterizing a scientific elite: The social characteristics of the most highly cited scientists in environmental science and ecology. Scientometrics 85 1 129143 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stack, S 2004 Gender, children and research productivity. Research in Higher Education 45 8 891920 .

  • Tasviri-Ghamsari, F, Jahannama, M 2008 Studying scientific productivity of researchers at Engineering Research Institute. Librarianship and Information Science (an Iranian Journal) 10 2 6379.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Teodorescu, D 2000 Correlates of faculty publication productivity: A cross-national analysis. Higher Education 39:201222 .

  • Wichian, S. N., Wongwanich, S., & Bowarnkitiwong, S. (2009). Factors affecting research productivity of faculty members in government universities: Lisrel and neural network analyses. http://kasetsartjournal.ku.ac.th/kuj_files/2009/A0906251543307343.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xie, Y, Shauman, K 1999 Commentary: Gender differences in research productivity. The Scientist 13 19 10.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

To see the editorial board, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Manuscript submission: http://www.editorialmanager.com/scim/

For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Scientometrics
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1978
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
12
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0138-9130 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2861 (Online)