View More View Less
  • 1 Research Center for Strategic Science and Technology Issues, Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China, Beijing, China
  • 2 Department of Mechanical Engineering and Institute of Industrial Engineering, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Road, Taipei 10617, Taiwan (ROC)
  • 3 Department of Library and Information Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
Restricted access

Abstract

Since China adopted Open-Up and Reformed Policy for global collaboration, China's science and technology have experienced an astounding growth. Papers and patents encompass valuable scientific and technological (S&T) information and collaborative efforts. This article studies China's international S&T collaboration from the perspective of paper and patent analysis. The results show that China's total papers and patents have continuously increased from 2004 to 2008, the papers and patents resulting from China's international collaboration also present a steady growth. However, there is a decline in the share of international collaboration papers and patents with a certain range due to the rapid independent R&D. China's international scientific collaboration (ISC) is broadly distributed over many countries, the USA being the most important ISC partners. China's international technological collaboration (ITC) is mainly carried out with USA and Taiwan, and Taiwan has been the most significant ITC partner of when taking countries’ patent output into account. Besides, ISC shows a continuous raise of Chinese papers’ citation. Even the countries with a small amount of papers and ISC with China, exert a positive influence on the impact of citation of Chinese papers as well. However, ITC does not always play an active role in the improvement of citation impact of Chinese patents.

  • Beaver, DD 2001 Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): Past, present, and future. Scientometris 52:365377 .

  • Bhattacharya, S 2004 Mapping inventive activity and technological change through patent analysis: A case study of India and China. Scientometrics 61:361381 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chang, YW 2010 Bi-lateral scientific collaboration between Taiwan and Japan: A bibliometric study of coauthored articles during 2000–2009. Journal of Library and Information Studies 8 2 5593.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Glanzel, W 2001 National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics 51:69115 .

  • Glanzel, W, Lange, CD 2002 A distributional approach to multinationality measures of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics 54:7589 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Glanzel, W, Debackere, K, Meyer, M 2008 ‘Triad’ or ‘tetrad’ ?. On global changes in a dynamic world. Scientometrics 74:7188 .

  • Guan, JC, He, Y 2007 Patent-bibliometric analysis on Chinese science-technology linkages. Scientometrics 72:403425 .

  • Guo, JJ, Cui, L, Zhang, H, Cui, L, Zhang, H, Han, DY et al. 2000 Bibliometrics study of international cooperation in science and technology. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Information Science 19:659662.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • He, TW 2009 International scientific collaboration of China with the G7 countries. Scientometrics 80:571582 .

  • Katz, JS, Martin, BR 1997 What is research collaboration. Research Policy 26:118 .

  • Lariviere, V, Gingras, Y 2011 Averages of ratios vs. ratios of averages: an empirical analysis of four levels of aggregation. Journal of Informetrics 5:392399 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, Y, Chang, Q 2001 Scientometrical measurement and evaluation on international collaboration of basic research in China. Journal of Management Sciences in China 4:6474.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ma, ZZ, Lee, Y, Chen, CFP 2009 Booming or emerging? China's technological capability and international collaboration in patent activities. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 76:787796 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moed, HF E De Bruin THN Van Leeuwen 1995 New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications. Scientometrics 33:381422 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rousseau, R 2008 Triad or tetrad: Another representation. ISSI Newsletter 4:57.

  • AFJ Van Raan 1996 Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises. Scientometrics 36:397420 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhou, P, Glanzel, W 2010 In-depth analysis on China's international cooperation in science. Scientometrics 82:597612 .