View More View Less
  • 1 ECOOM & Research Division INCENTIM, Faculty of Business and Economics, K.U. Leuven, Waaistraat 6, Bus 3536, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
Restricted access

Abstract

Indicators based on non-patent references (NPRs) are increasingly being used for measuring and assessing science–technology interactions. But NPRs in patent documents contain noise, as not all of them can be considered ‘scientific’. In this article, we introduce the results of a machine-learning algorithm that allows identifying scientific references in an automated manner. Using the obtained results, we analyze indicators based on NPRs, with a focus on the difference between NPR- and scientific non-patent references-based indicators. Differences between both indicators are significant and dependent on the considered patent system, the applicant country and the technological domain. These results signal the relevancy of delineating scientific references when using NPRs to assess the occurrence and impact of science–technology interactions.

  • Bishop, CM 2006 Pattern recognition and machine learning Springer New York.

  • Callaert, J., Grouwels, J., & Van Looy, B. (2011), Delineating the scientific footprint in technology: Identifying scientific publications within non-patent references. In: E. Noyons, P. Ngulube & J. Leta (eds.), Proceedings of ISSI 2011—The 13th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Durban (pp. 1318). San Juan: ISSI.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Callaert, J B Van Looy Verbeek, A, Debackere, K, Thijs, B 2006 Traces of prior art: An analysis of non-patent references found in patent documents. Scientometrics 69 1 320 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Guan, JC, He, Y 2007 Patent-bibliometric analysis on the Chinese science—Technology linkages. Scientometrics 72 3 403425 .

  • Harhoff, D, Scherer, FM, Vopel, K 2003 Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research Policy 32 8 13431363 .

  • Hastie, T, Friedman, J 2009 The elements of statistical learning—Data mining, inference, and prediction 2 Springer-Verlag New York.

  • He, ZL, Deng, M 2007 The evidence of systematic noise in non-patent references: A study of New Zealand companies’ patents. Scientometrics 72 1 149166 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kotsiantis, SB 2007 Supervised machine learning: A review of classification techniques IE Magogliannis eds. et al. Emerging Artificial Intelligence Applications in Computer Engineering IOS Press Amsterdam.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lo, SCS 2010 Scientific linkage of science research and technology development: A case of genetic engineering research. Scientometrics 82 1 109120 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Magerman, T B Van Looy Song, X 2010 Exploring the feasibility and accuracy of latent semantic analysis based text mining techniques to detect similarity between patent documents and scientific publications. Scientometrics 82 2 289306 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meyer, M 2000 Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature. Research Policy 29:409434 .

  • Meyer, M 2000 What is special about patent citations? Differences between scientific and patent citations. Scientometrics 49 1 93123 .

  • Michel, J, Bettels, B 2001 Patent citation analysis: A closer look at the basic input data from patent search reports. Scientometrics 51 1 185201 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Narin, F, Noma, E 1985 Is technology becoming science?. Scientometrics 7:369381 .

  • Nelson, AJ 2009 Measuring knowledge spillovers: What patents, licenses and publications reveal about innovation diffusion. Research Policy 38:9941005 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Salton, G, Wong, A, Yang, CS 1975 A vector space model for automatic indexing. Communications of the ACM 18 11 613620 .

  • Schmoch, U. (2008). Concept of a technology classification for country comparisons. Final report to the world intellectual property organization.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tijssen, RJW, Buter, RK TN Van Leeuwen 2000 Technological relevance of science: Validation and analysis of citation linkages between patents and research papers. Scientometrics 47:389412 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • B Van Looy Callaert, J, Debackere, K, Verbeek, A 2002 Patent-related indicators for assessing knowledge-generating institutions: Towards a contextualised approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer 28 1 5361 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • B Van Looy Magerman, T, Debackere, K 2007 Developing technology in the vicinity of science: An examination of the relationship between science intensity (of patents) and technological productivity within the field of biotechnology. Scientometrics 70 2 441458 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • B Van Looy Zimmermann, E, Veugelers, R, Verbeek, A, Mello, J, Debackere, K 2003 Do science–technology interactions pay off when developing technology?. Scientometrics 57 3 355367 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • B Van Vianen Moed, H A Van Raan 1990 An exploration of the science base of recent technology. Research Policy 19:6181 .

  • Verbeek, A, Debackere, K, Luwel, M, Zimmermann, E 2002 Measuring progress and evolution in science and technology-I: The multiple uses of bibliometric indicators. International Journal of Management Reviews 4 2 179211 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Verspagen, B 2008 Knowledge flows, patent citations and the impact of science on technology. Economic Systems Research 20 4 266339.

Manuscript submission: http://www.editorialmanager.com/scim/

  • Impact Factor (2019): 2.867
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2019): 1.210
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2019): 106
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Computer Science Apllications
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Library and Information Sciences
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Impact Factor (2018): 2.770
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2018): 1.113
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2018): 95
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q1 Library and Information Sciences
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q1 Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer

Scientometrics
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1978
Volumes
per Year
4
Issues
per Year
12
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0138-9130 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2861 (Online)