View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Computer Science, Istanbul Bilgi University, Istanbul, Turkey
Restricted access

Abstract

This article, elaborating on mutuality of knowledge and social structure theory borrowed from sociology of knowledge literature, where knowledge is perceived as an essentially social and societal category, develops a coherent research framework which relates cognitive structure and the collaboration patterns into an integrated socio-knowledge analysis of a given scientific community. The framework extends co-word analysis combining it with social network analysis. The framework is enhanced by introducing a novel model. The new model maps actors from co-authorship networks into a strategic diagram of scientists. The mapping is based on cohesiveness and pervasiveness of issues each author has published in the field. The exemplary longitudinal case from Turkey covers scientific publication activities in Turkish management academia spanning the years from 1922 until 2008. It is seen that, while within local community diffusion of management knowledge is lead by academicians with certain socio-cognitive properties, academicians publishing at international arena do not show any significantly differing socio-cognitive properties, instead, they are merely embedded in strongly connected groups. Leading academicians within local community, however, exhibit a common socio-cognitive structure relative to the rest of the community. They have more social ties and more diversified disseminated knowledge compared to the rest. Knowledge they disseminate is distinct compared to their peers in the network, they hold certain part of their knowledge exclusively, thus knowledge-wise they don't resemble the rest, but they keep a level of common knowledge with the rest of the community.

  • Bourdieu, P. 1998 Practical reason: On the theory of action Stanford University Press Palo Alto.

  • Cahlik, T. (2000). Comparison of the maps of science.Scientometrics, 49(3), 373-387.

  • Calero, C., Buter, R., Valdes, C., Noyons, E. (2006). How to identify research groups using publication analysis: an example in the field of nanotechnology, Scientometrics, 66 (2), 365376.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Callon, M., Law, J., Rip, A. 1986 Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world The Macmillian Press Ltd New York.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carley, K. M., Reminga, J., Storrick, J., De Reno, M. (2009). ORA User's Guide 2009, Institute for Software Research, School of Computer Science. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collins, R. 1998 The sociology of philosophies: A global theory of intellectual change Harvard University Press Cambridge.

  • Doerfel, M. & Barnett, G. (1999). Application semantic network analysis of the International Communication Association. Human Communication Research, 25 (4), 589603.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Durkheim, E. 1974 Sociology and philosophy Free Press New York.

  • Geisler, E. (2007). A typology of knowledge management: strategic groups and role behavior in organizations. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11 (1): 8496.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gordon, A. D. 1999 Classification Chapman and Hall London.

  • He, Q. (1999). Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library Trends, 48 (1), 133159.

  • Hollander, M., Wolfe, D. A. 1973 Nonparametric statistical methods Wiley New York.

  • Law, J. & Whittaker, J. (1992). Mapping acidification research: A test of the co-word method. Scientometrics, 23 (3), 417461.

  • Leydesdorff, L. (1992). A validation-study of leximappe. Scientometrics, 24 (2), 295312.

  • Mannheim, K. 1986 Ideology and utopia : An introduction to the sociology of knowledge Routledge and Kegan Paul London.

  • Merton, R. K. 1968 Social theory and social structure Free Press New York.

  • Mika, P. 2005 Social networks and the Semantic Web: The next challenge. IEEE Intelligent Systems 20:8285.

  • Morris, S. A. B. Van der Veer Martens 2008 Betsy, mapping research specialties. Annual Review of Information Science And Technology 42:213295 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mutschke, P., Haase, A. 2001 Collaboration and cognitive structures in social science research fields. Towards socio-cognitive analysis in information systems. Scientometrics 52:487502 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Neff, M. W., Corley, E. A. 2009 35 years and 160,000 articles: A bibliometric exploration of the evolution of ecology. Scientometrics 80 3 657682 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Noyons, E., Calero Medina, C. 2009 Applying bibliometric mapping in a high level science policy context. Scientometrics 79:261275 .

  • Ozel, B. (2011). Cognitive structures and collaboration patterns in academia. In: E. Noyons, P. Ngulube, J. Leta (eds.), Proceedings of ISSI 2011. The 13th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 638649). Durban.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Qin, J. 1994 An investigation of research collaboration in the sciences through the philosophical transactions 1901–1991. Scientometrics 29:219238 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scheler, M. 1980 Problems of a sociology of knowledge Routledge London.

  • Scott, J. 2000 Social network analysis: A handbook Sage London.

  • Tijssen, R. 1993 A scientometric cognitive study of neural network research: Expert mental maps versus bibliometric maps. Scientometrics 28:111136 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wasserman, S., Faust, K. 1994 Social Network Analysis Cambridge University Press Cambridge.

  • Whittaker, J., Courtial, J. P., Law, J. 1989 Creativity and conformity in science: Titles, keywords and co-word analysis. Social Studies of Science 19:473496 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Manuscript submission: http://www.editorialmanager.com/scim/

  • Impact Factor (2019): 2.867
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2019): 1.210
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2019): 106
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Computer Science Apllications
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Library and Information Sciences
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Impact Factor (2018): 2.770
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2018): 1.113
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2018): 95
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q1 Library and Information Sciences
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q1 Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer

Scientometrics
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1978
Volumes
per Year
4
Issues
per Year
12
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0138-9130 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2861 (Online)