View More View Less
  • 1 WISE Lab, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116085, China
  • | 2 School of Public Administration and Law, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116085, China
  • | 3 National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
Restricted access

Abstract

In this paper, we use bibliometric methods and social network analysis to analyze the pattern of China–US scientific collaboration on individual level in nanotechnology. Results show that Chinese–American scientists have been playing an important role in China–US scientific collaboration. We find that China–US collaboration in nanotechnology mainly occurs between Chinese and Chinese–American scientists. In the co-authorship network, Chinese–American scientists tend to have higher betweenness centrality. Moreover, the series of polices implemented by the Chinese government to recruit oversea experts seems to contribute a lot to China–US scientific collaboration.

  • Beaver, DB, Rosen, R 1978 Studies in scientific collaboration. I. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics 1 1 6584 .

  • Borgatti, SP 2002 NetDraw: Graph visualization Software Analytic Technologies Harvard.

  • Bozeman, B, Corley, E 2004 Scientists’ collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy 33 4 599616 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, H, Kostoff, RN, Chen, C, Zhang, J, Vogeley, MSE, Börner, K, Ma, N, Duhon, RJ, Zoss, A, Srinivasan, V, Fox, EA, Yang, CC, Wei, CP 2009 AI and global science and technology assessment. IEEE Intelligent Systems 24 4 6888 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davidson Frame, J, Carpenter, MP 1979 International research collaboration. Social Studies of Science 9 4 481 .

  • Glänzel, W C De Lange 2002 A distributional approach to multinationality measures of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics 54 1 7589 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • He, T 2009 International scientific collaboration of China with the G7 countries. Scientometrics 80 3 571582 .

  • Jin, B., & Rousseau, R. (2005). China's quantitative expansion phase: exponential growth but low impact. In P. Ingwersen & B. Larsen (eds.), ISSI 2005: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics. Stockholm.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Katz, JS, Martin, BR 1997 What is research collaboration?. Research Policy 26 1 118 .

  • Kostoff, RN, Briggs, M, Rushenberg, R, Bowles, CA, Icenhour, AS, Nikodym, KF, Barth, RB, Pecht, M 2007 Chinese science and technology? Structure and infrastructure. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74 9 15391573 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kostoff, RN, Koytcheff, RG, Lau, CGY 2007 Global nanotechnology research metrics. Scientometrics 70 3 565601 .

  • Luukkonen, T, Persson, O, Sivertsen, G 1992 Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology and Human Values 17 1 101 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Melin, G 2000 Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy 29 1 3140 .

  • Meyer, M, Debackere, K, Glänzel, W 2010 Can applied science be ‘good science’? Exploring the relationship between patent citations and citation impact in nanoscience. Scientometrics 85 2 527539 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Newman, MEJ 2001 Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E 64 1 18.

  • Newman, MEJ 2004 Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101 Suppl 1 5200 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tang, L, Shapira, P 2011 China–US scientific collaboration in nanotechnology: Patterns and dynamics. Scientometrics 88 1 116 .

Manuscript submission: http://www.editorialmanager.com/scim/

  • Impact Factor (2019): 2.867
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2019): 1.210
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2019): 106
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Computer Science Apllications
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Library and Information Sciences
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Impact Factor (2018): 2.770
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2018): 1.113
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2018): 95
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q1 Library and Information Sciences
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q1 Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer

Scientometrics
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1978
Volumes
per Year
4
Issues
per Year
12
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0138-9130 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2861 (Online)