View More View Less
  • 1 Science and Technology Policy Research and Information Center, National Applied Research Laboratories, 14 F, No. 106, Sec. 2, He-Ping E. Rd., Taipei 10636, Taiwan qcchen@stpi.narl.org.tw
Restricted access

Abstract

This paper employs bibliometric methods to observe collaboration patterns of scientific publications in biotechnology, information and computer technology, future energy, and nanotechnology among different institutions in Taiwan. The results show primary domestic and international collaborative patterns, the effect of collaborative papers on the world-wide average, collaborative networks, and the distribution of institutions on global map. The findings suggest that domestic collaboration in each area is higher in proportion than international collaboration. Biotechnology leads in both domestic and international collaborative percentage. Among cooperative benchmarking countries, the US and China are the main partners. Collaboration among research institutes and universities is the most frequent collaborative pattern in each area except biotechnology, which tends to occur between hospitals and universities. On average, international collaborative papers tend to have greater effect, except in nanotechnology. Academia Sinica collaborated frequently with foreign institutes in each research field. A further analysis on how each collaborative group forms is recommended, especially collaboration among the Triple-Helix relationships.

  • Chinchilla-Rodriguez, Z., Moya-Anegon, F., Vargas-Quesada, B., Corera-Alvarez, B., & Hassan-Montero, Y. (2008). Inter-institutional scientific collaboration: An approach from social network analysis. In Prime-Latin America Conference, Mexico.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Glanzel, W, Schubert, A 2004 Analyzing scientific collaboration through co-authorship H Kretschmer eds. et al. International workshop on webometrics, informetrics and scientometrics (WIS 2004) IIT Roorkee, Uttranchal 99109.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Katz, JS, Martin, BB 1997 What is research collaboration?. Research Policy 26:118 .

  • Luukkonen, T, Persson, O, Sivertsen, G 1992 Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology and Human Values 17 1 101126 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Narin, F., & Whitlow, E. S. (1990). Measurement of scientific cooperation and co-authorship in EC-related areas of science. EC-Report EUR 12900.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NordForsk 2010 Bibliometric research performance indicators for the Nordic countries NordForsk Oslo, Norway.

  • Petersen, LS, Larsen, H 2007 Riso energy report 6: Future options for energy technologies Riso National Laboratory Roskilde, West Zealand.

  • Rogers, J. (2000). Theoretical consideration of collaboration in scientific research. In S. Hauger & C. McEnaney (eds.), Strategies for competitiveness in academic research (pp. 151177). American Association for the Advancement of Science. Retrieved Sep 1, 2011, from http://www.aaas.org/spp/rcp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sandstrom, A., & Norgren, L. (2003). Swedish Biotechnology—scientific publications, patenting and industrial development. Stockholm: VINNOVA Analysis VA. Retrieved May 1, 2011, from http://www.vinnova.se/upload/EPiStorePDF/va-03-02.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Science and Technology Policy Research and Information Center 2008 Global nanotechnology development and planning (STPI-ROB-97-03) STPI Taipei.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stokols, D, Hall, KL, Taylor, BK, Moser, RP 2008 The science of team science—overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 35 2 S77S89 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Van Looy, B., du Plessis, M., & Magerman, T. (2006). Data production methods for hamonized patent statistics: Patentee sector allocation. KUL Working Paper No. MSI 0606.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wagner, C 2006 International collaboration in science and technology: promises and pitfalls L Box R Engelhard eds. Science and technology policy for development, dialogues at the interface Anthem Press London.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wuchy, S, Jones, BF, Uzzi, B 2007 The increasing dominance of team in production of knowledge. Science 316 5827 10361039 .

Manuscript submission: http://www.editorialmanager.com/scim/

  • Impact Factor (2019): 2.867
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2019): 1.210
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2019): 106
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Computer Science Apllications
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Library and Information Sciences
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Impact Factor (2018): 2.770
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2018): 1.113
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2018): 95
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q1 Library and Information Sciences
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q1 Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer

Scientometrics
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1978
Volumes
per Year
4
Issues
per Year
12
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0138-9130 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2861 (Online)