View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Industrial and Information Management, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan, ROC
  • 2 Graduate School of Business and Management, Vanung University, Chung-Li, Taiwan, ROC
  • 3 Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, National Science Council, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
Restricted access

Abstract

Research performance is difficult to evaluate because most of the criteria are incommensurable, and assessing its improvement over time is even more difficult. This paper assesses the performance improvement in management research in Taiwan between 2006 and 2010 using the Malmquist productivity index (MPI). The criteria for measuring research performance are journal publications, where the journals are classified as SI-, TI-, other international-, and other local-types. While the number of papers has increased for three types and decreased in one, the MPI indicates that the aggregate performance has improved significantly. The areas of management covered in this study are management information systems, production and operations management, and marketing. For all these areas the performance has improved, although the improvement in marketing is insignificant. The assessment sheds some light on the area and category of journals that contribute to the improvement of research performance, and which are useful for setting goals to reach higher levels.

  • Abramo, G, D’Angelo, CA, Costa, FD 2011 A national-scale cross-time analysis of university research performance. Scientometrics 87:399413 .

  • Abramo, G, D’Angelo, CA, Pugini, F 2008 The measurement of Italian universities’ research productivity by a nonparametric–bibliometric methodology. Scientometrics 76:225244 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Albert, A, Granadino, B, Plaza, LM 2007 Scientific and technological performance evaluation of the Spanish Council of Scientific Research (CSIC) in the field of biotechnology. Scientometrics 70:4151 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Andersen, P, Petersen, NC 1993 A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 39:12611264 .

  • Banker, RD, Chang, H 2006 The super-efficiency procedure for outlier identification, not for ranking efficient units. European Journal of Operational Research 175:13111320 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brockett, PL, Golany, B 1996 Using rank statistics for determining programmatic efficiency differences in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 42:467472 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Caves, DW, Christensen, LR, Diewert, WE 1982 The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econometrica 50:13931414 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Caves, DW, Christensen, LR, Diewert, WE 1982 Multilateral comparisons of output, input, and productivity using superlative index numbers. The Economic Journal 92:7386 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Charnes, A, Cooper, WW 1984 The non-Archimedean CCR ratio for efficiency analysis: a rejoinder to Boyd and Färe. European Journal of Operational Research 15:333334 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Charnes, A, Cooper, WW, Rhodes, E 1978 Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2:429444 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Claro, J, Costa, CAV 2011 A made-to-measure indicator for cross-disciplinary bibliometric ranking of researchers performance. Scientometrics 86:113123 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Coccia, M 2005 A scientometric model for the assessment of scientific research performance within public institutes. Scientometrics 65:307321 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • K De Witte Rogge, N 2010 To publish or not to publish? On the aggregation and drivers of research performance. Scientometrics 85:657680 .

  • Docampo, D 2011 On using the Shanghai ranking to assess the research performance of university systems. Scientometrics 86:7792 .

  • Färe, R, Grosskopf, S, Norris, M, Zhang, Z 1994 Productivity growth, technical progress and efficiency change in industrialized countries. American Economic Review 84:6683.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gupta, BM, Kshitij, A, Verma, C 2011 Mapping of Indian computer science research output, 1999–2008. Scientometrics 86:261283 .

  • Huang, MH, Chang, HW, Chen, DZ 2006 Research evaluation of research- oriented universities in Taiwan from 1993–2003. Scientometrics 67:419435.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kao, C 1994 Evaluation of junior colleges of technology: the Taiwan case. European Journal of Operational Research 72:4351 .

  • Kao, C 2009 The authorship and country spread of OR journals. Scientometrics 78:397407 .

  • Kao, C 2009 The authorship and internationality of industrial engineering journals. Scientometrics 81:123136 .

  • Kao, C, Pao, HL 2009 An evaluation of research performance in management of 168 Taiwan universities. Scientometrics 78:261277 .

  • Kao, C, Pao, HL 2012 Predicting project approvals: a case of grants from the National Science Council of Taiwan. Omega 40:8995 .

  • Kao, C, Wu, WY, Hsieh, WJ, Wang, TY, Lin, C, Chen, LH 2008 Measuring the national competitiveness of southeast Asian countries. European Journal of Operational Research 187:613628 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meng, W, Hu, ZH, Liu, WB 2006 Efficiency evaluation of basic research in China. Scientometrics 69:85101 .

  • Moed, HF 2002 Measuring China's research performance using the science citation index. Scientometrics 53:281296 .

  • Pastor, JT, Lovell, CAK 2005 A global Malmquist productivity index. Economics Letters 88:266271 .

  • Pastor, JT, Lovell, CAK 2007 Circularity of the Malmquist productivity index. Economic Theory 33:591599 .

  • Roll, Y, Golany, B 1993 Alternative methods of treating factor weights in DEA. Omega 21:99109 .

  • Ruiz, CF, Bonilla, R, Chavarro, D, Orozco, LA, Zarama, R, Polanco, X 2010 Efficiency measurement of research groups using data Envelopment analysis and bayesian networks. Scientometrics 83:711721 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schmoch, U, Schubert, T 2009 Sustainability of incentives for excellent research–the German case. Scientometrics 81:195218 .

  • Sombatsompop, N, Markpin, T, Yochai, W, Saechiew, M 2005 An evaluation of research performance for different subject categories using impact factor point average (IFPA) index: Thailand case study. Scientometrics 65:293305 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sueyoshi, T 1998 Privatization of Nippon Telegraph and Telephone: was it a good policy decision?. European Journal of Operational Research 107:4561 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sueyoshi, T, Aoki, S 2001 A use of a nonparametric statistic for DEA frontier shift: the Kruskal and Wallis rank test. Omega 29:118 .

  • Sueyoshi, T, Sekitani, K 2009 DEA congestion and returns to scale under an occurrence of multiple optimal projections. European Journal of Operational Research 194:592607 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thompson, RG FD Singleton Jr Thrall, RM, Smith, BA 1986 Comparative site evaluations for locating a high-energy physics lab in Texas. Interfaces 16 6 3549 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation