With reference to Vanclay (Scientometrics in press, 2012) the paper argues for a pragmatic approach to the Thomson-Reuter's journal impact factor. The paper proposes and discusses to replace the current synchronous Thomson-Reuter journal impact factor by an up-to-date diachronic version (DJIF), consisting of a three-year citation window over a one year publication window. The DJIF online data collection and calculation is exemplified and compared to the present synchronous journal impact factor. The paper discusses briefly the dimensions of currency, robustness, understandability and comparability to other impact factors used in research evaluation.
Christensen, FH, Ingwersen, P 1996 Online citation analysis—A methodological approach. Scientometrics 37 1 39–62 .
Egghe, L, Rousseau, R 1990 Introduction to informetrics Elsevier Amsterdam.
Ingwersen, P, Larsen, B, Wormell, I 2000 Applying diachronic citation analysis to research program evaluations B Cronin HB Atkins eds. The web of knowledge: Festschrift for Eugene Garfield Information Today Medford 373–388.
Ingwersen, P, Larsen, B, Rousseau, R, Davis, M 2001 The publication-citation matrix and its derived quantities. Chinese Science Bulletin 46 6 524–528 .
Moed, H. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer.
Rousseau, R 1998 Citation distribution in pure mathematics journals L Egghe R Rousseau eds. Informetrics 87/88 Elsevier Science Amsterdam 249–260.
Rousseau, R, Leydesdorff, L 2011 Simple arithmetic versus intuitive understanding: The case of the impact factor. ISSI Newsletter 7 1 10–14.
Seglen, PO 1995 Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45 1 1–11 .
Seglen, PO 1997 Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluation research. British Medical Journal 314:498–502 .
Vanclay, J. K. (2012). Impact factor: Outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? Scientometrics (in press).