View More View Less
  • 1 Thomson Reuters, 1500 Spring Garden Street, Fourth Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19130, USA
  • | 2 Thomson Reuters, 103 Clarendon Road, Leeds LS2 9DF, UK
Restricted access

Abstract

We discuss research evaluation, the nature of impact, and the use of the Thomson Reuters journal impact factor and other indicators in scientometrics in the light of recent commentary.

  • ABRC (1987). A strategy for the science base. HMSO, London. ISBN 0 11 270627 4.

  • Adam, D 2002 Citation analysis: The counting house. Nature 415:726729 .

  • Adams, J 2002 Research assessment in the UK. Science 296:805 .

  • Adams, J 2005 Early citation counts correlate with accumulated impact. Scientometrics 65 3 567581 .

  • Adams, J. (2007). The use of bibliometrics to measure research quality in UK higher education institutions. Universities UK, London. ISBN 1 84036 165 4 http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/Publications/Documents/bibliometrics.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Adams, J. (2008). Strategic review of the performance-based research fund: The assessment process. A report to the New Zealand Tertiary Education Council, http://www.tec.govt.nz/Documents/Reports%20and%20other%20documents/pbrf-strategic-review-of-asessment-process-2008-review.pdf p. 112.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Adams, J 2009 The use of bibliometrics to measure research quality in UK higher education institutions. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis 57:1932 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Adams, J, Gurney, KA, Marshall, S 2007 Profiling citation impact: A new methodology. Scientometrics 72 2 325344 .

  • Adams, J, Jackson, L, Simmonds, P, Stroyan, J 2006 Evaluating social science bibliometrics and research indicators. A report to the UK Economic and Social Research Council ESRC Swindon.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Adams, J., Mount, D.R., Smith, D. & Thomson, S. (2010). The future of the UK university research base. A report to Universities UK. Universities UK, London. http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/Publications/Documents/UUK-FutureOfResearch-LiteratureReview.pdf p. 63.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Adams, J., & Smith, D. (2007). Higher education, research and the knowledge economy: From Robbins to the gathering storm. In D. Watson & M. Amoah (eds.), The dearing report, ten years on. Institute of Education. ISBN 0 85473 780 4. London, pp. 81108.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Adams, J, Watt, PJ, Naylor, CJ, Greenwood, PJ 1989 Loading constraints, body size and mating preference in Gammarus species. Hydrobiologia 183:157164 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bensman, S. J. (2012). The impact factor: Its place in Garfield's thought, in science evaluation, and in library collection management. Scientometrics. doi: .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Braun, T. (2007). The impact factor of scientific and scholarly journals: Its use and misuse in research evaluation. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest. ISBN 9 63 058528 6.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Buchanan, RA 2006 Accuracy of cited references: The role of citation databases. College and Research Libraries 67:292303.

  • Campanario, JM 2011 Empirical study of journal impact factors obtained using the classical two-year citation window versus a five-year citation window. Scientometrics 87:189204 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Campanario, JM, Carretero, J, Marangon, V, Molina, A, Ros, G 2011 Effect on the journal impact factor of the number and document type of citing records: A wide-scale study. Scientometrics 87:7584 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • European Commission (2012). Evidence base for research and innovation. http://ec.europa.eu/research/evaluations/index_en.cfm?pg=fp7-evidence.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Garfield, E 1955 Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science 122:108111 .

  • Garfield, E 1972 Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation: Journals can be ranked by frequency and impact of citations for science policy studies. Science 178:471479 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Garfield, E 1976 Significant journals of science. Nature 264:609615 .

  • Garfield, E 2006 The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. Journal of the American Medical Association 295:9093 .

  • Garfield, E, Sher, IH 1963 New factors in evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing. American Documentation 14:195201 .

  • Goodhart, CAE 1975 Monetary relationships: A view from threadneedle street. papers in monetary economics Reserve Bank of Australia Sydney.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HM Government (1993). Realising our potential: A strategy for science, engineering and technology., Cm 2250. HMSO, London. ISBN 0 10 122502 4.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hirsch, JE 2005 An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 102:1656916572 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hubbard, SC, McVeigh, ME 2011 Casting a wide net: The journal impact factor numerator. Learned Publishing 24:133137 .

  • Leydesdorff, L. (2012). Alternatives to the journal impact factor: I3 and the top-10% (or top-25%?) of the most-highly cited papers. Scientometrics. doi: .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leydesdorff, L, Bornmann, L 2011 Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors: An alternative research design with policy implications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62:21332146 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marx, W 2011 Special features of historical papers from the viewpoint of bibliometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62:433439.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moed, M. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 9596 and 174-178.

  • Moed, H. F., Glanzel, W., & Schmoch, U. (2004). Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (eds.). Kluwer, Dordrecht. ISBN 1 4020 2702 8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moed, HF TN van Leeuwen 1996 Impact factors can mislead. Nature 381:186 .

  • Pendlebury, D. A. (2008). Thomson scientific corrects inaccuracies in editorial. Retrieved from http://community.thomsonreuters.com/t5/Citation-Impact-Center/Thomson-Scientific-Corrects-Inaccuracies-In-Editorial/ba-p/717/message-uid/717. Accessed on 29 January 2012.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pendlebury, DA 2009 The use and misuse of journal metrics and other citation indicators. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis 57:111 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rousseau, R. (2012). Updating the journal impact factor or total overhaul? Scientometrics. doi: .

  • Rossner, M H Van Epps Hill, E 2007 Show me the data. Journal of Cell Biology 179:10911092 .

  • Testa, J. (2008). The Thomson Reuters journal selection process. Retrieved from http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/free/essays/journal_selection_process/. Accessed 29 January 2012.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Testa, J. (2011). The globalization of the Web of science: 2005-2010. Retrieved from http://wokinfo.com/media/pdf/globalwos-essay.pdf. Accessed 29 January 2012.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thomson Reuters (2012). Journal citation reports. Retrieved from http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/science_products/a-z/journal_citation_reports/. Accessed 29 January 2012.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AFJ Van Raan 2005 Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics 62 1 133143 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vanclay, J. K. (2012). Impact factor: Outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? Scientometrics. doi: .

Manuscript submission: http://www.editorialmanager.com/scim/

  • Impact Factor (2019): 2.867
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2019): 1.210
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2019): 106
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Computer Science Apllications
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Library and Information Sciences
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Impact Factor (2018): 2.770
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2018): 1.113
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2018): 95
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q1 Library and Information Sciences
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q1 Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer

Scientometrics
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1978
Volumes
per Year
4
Issues
per Year
12
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0138-9130 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2861 (Online)