View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Legal and Economic Governance Studies, School of Management and Governance, Institute for Governance Studies, Centre for European Studies, University of Twente, Schiehavenkade 472, 3024 EZ, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Restricted access

Abstract

This article provides an empirical assessment of the performance of the member states of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations in terms of science, technology, and innovation. This study is relevant because it employs a larger data set, examines more countries, and covers more years than previous studies. The results indicate that these countries had differing patterns of performance, and the pattern of growth among them was asymmetrical. Additional findings suggest that these countries performed idiosyncratically with respect to the six quantitative dimensions we examined. Our research includes a form of comparative policy evaluation that might assist the monitoring of the implementation of “Vision 2020”. The results simplify how we determine the relative strengths and weaknesses of national innovation systems and are relevant to policy discussions. In relation to transferability, the findings demonstrate similarities to the European Union with regard to performance and governance.

  • Ahrens, J. Governance and the implementation of technology policy in less developed countries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 2002 11:441476 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ASEAN. (1997). ASEAN Vision 2020. Kuala Lumpur: ASEAN. Retrieved December 14, 2011, from http://www.aseansec.org/1814.htm.

  • APAST. (2007). ASEAN Plan of Action on S&T: 2007–2011. Retrieved March 1, 2011, from http://www.aseansec.org/5187-14.pdf.

  • ASEANSEC. (2009). ASEAN Socio-cultural community, science and technology: Overview. Retrieved March 1, 2011, from http://www.aseansec.org/19592.htm.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Celikel Esser, F. (2007). The link between innovation performance and governance. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports (JRC42104). Ispra: Joint Research Centre. Retrieved December 14, 2011, from http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/111111111/13246/1/reqno_jrc42104_the%20link%20between%20innovation%20performance%20and%20governance%20%5b2%5d.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chou, S. (2010). Role of ASEAN COST in Sustaining S&T Innovations. In iBoP Asia's Innovations Forum Manila. Retrieved March 1, 2011, from http://www.ibop-asia.net.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • De Solla Price, D. (1969). Measuring the size of science. In Proceedings of the Israel academy of science and humanities (pp. 1011).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dodgson, M 2000 Policies for science, technology and innovation in Asian newly industrializing economies L Kim R Nelson eds. Technology level, learning and innovation: Experiences of newly industrializing economies Cambridge University Press New York 229268.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dodgson, M. (2002). Science, technology, and innovation: Issues and rationales. In M. Asher, D. Newman & T. Snyder (eds.), Public policy in Asia: Implications for business and government (pp. 241264). Westport: Quorum Books.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Donnelly, S 2010 Regimes of European integration: Constructing governance of the single market Oxford University Press Oxford.

  • Hollanders, H., & Arundel, A. (2006). 2006 Global Innovation Scoreboard (GIS) report. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved December 14, 2011, from http://www.proinno-europe.eu/doc/eis_2006_global_innovation_report.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hollanders, H., & Arundel, A. (2007). Differences in socio-economic conditions and regulatory environment: Explaining variations in national innovation performance and policy implications. INNO-Metrics Thematic Paper. Retrieved December 14, 2011, from http://proinno.intrasoft.be/admin/uploaded_documents/eis_2007_Socio-economic_conditions.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hollanders, H., & Tarantola, S. (2011). Innovation Union Scoreboard 2010: Methodology Report. Retrieved February 1, 2011, from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/files/ius-2010-methodology-report_en.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430. Retrieved March 1, 2011, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1682130.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). Access governance indicators. Retrieved March 1, 2011 from http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/sc_country.asp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lai, M, Yap, S. Technology development in Malaysia and the newly industrializing economies: A comparative analysis. Asia-Pacific Development Journal 2004 11:5380.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lall, S 2000 Technological change and industrialization in the Asian newly industrialized economies: Achievements and challenges L Kim R Nelson eds. Technology level, learning and innovation: Experiences of newly industrializing economies Cambridge University Press New York 229268.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Narin, F. Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics 1994 30:147155 .

  • Nguyen, T, Pham, L. Scientific output and its relationship to knowledge economy: An analysis of ASEAN countries. Scientometrics 2011 89 1 107117 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • OECD. (2003). Composite indicators of country performance: A critical assessment. STI Working Paper 2003/16. Paris: OECD.

  • OECD 2004 OECD science, technology and industry outlook 2004 OECD Paris .

  • OECD 2008 Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide OECD Paris.

  • Remøe, S. (2005). Governance of innovation systems: Volume 1 synthesis report. Retrieved March 1, 2011, from http://www.mkm.ee/failid/OECD_Governance_of_innovation_systems___9205081E__2_.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Remøe, S. Supra-national governance of research and innovation policies and economic globalization: Tensions and dilemmas. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 2010 1 4 268288 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sajeva, M, Gatelli, D, Tarantola, S, Hollanders, H 2005 Methodology report on European innovation scoreboard 2005: European trend chart on innovation European Commission Brussels.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schibany, A, Streicher, G. The European innovation scoreboard: Drowning by number?. Science and Public Policy 2008 35:717732 .

  • Sigurdson, J., & Palonka, K. (2002). Technological governance in ASEAN: Failings in technology transfer and domestic research. Working Paper 162. Retrieved March 1, 2011, from http://swopec.hhs.se/eijswp/abs/eijswp0162.htm.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tarantola, S 2008 European Innovation Scoreboard: Strategies to measure country progress over time. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen Office for Official Publications of the European Communities Luxembourg.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Teece, D, Pisano, G. The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change 1994 3:537556 .

  • UNESCO. (2011). Institute for statistics, data centre: Predefined tables. Retrieved February 1, 2011, from http://stats.uis.unesco.org/unesco/ReportFolders/ReportFolders.aspx.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United Nations Development Programme. (2010). Human Development Report 2010. Retrieved May 25, 2011, from http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_2010_EN_Table3_reprint.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United Nations Statistics Division. (2011). National accounts estimates of main aggregates: UN data, per capita GDP at current prices US dollars. Retrieved March 5, 2011, from http://data.un.org/Data.aspx?q=GDP+per+capita&d=SNAAMA&f=grID%3a101%3bcurrID%3aUSD%3bpcFlag%3a1#SNAAMA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vinluan, L. (2011). Research productivity in education and psychology in the Philippines and comparison with ASEAN countries. Scientometrics, Online First. doi: .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WIPO. (2011). Statistics on patents, statistical publication: World intellectual property indicators 2010. Retrieved March 5, 2011, from http://www.wipo.int/ipstats/en/statistics/patents/.

    • Export Citation
  • World Bank. (2011). List of economies. Retrieved February 1, 2011, from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DATASTATISTICS/Resources/CLASS.XLS.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation