Among the most recent bibliometric indicators for normalizing the differences among fields of science in terms of citation behaviour, Kosmulski (J Informetr 5(3):481–485, 2011) proposed the NSP (number of successful paper) index. According to the authors, NSP deserves much attention for its great simplicity and immediate meaning—equivalent to those of the h-index—while it has the disadvantage of being prone to manipulation and not very efficient in terms of statistical significance. In the first part of the paper, we introduce the success-index, aimed at reducing the NSP-index's limitations, although requiring more computing effort. Next, we present a detailed analysis of the success-index from the point of view of its operational properties and a comparison with the h-index's ones. Particularly interesting is the examination of the success-index scale of measurement, which is much richer than the h-index's. This makes success-index much more versatile for different types of analysis—e.g., (cross-field) comparisons of the scientific output of (1) individual researchers, (2) researchers with different seniority, (3) research institutions of different size, (4) scientific journals, etc.
Amin, M., & Mabe, M. (2000). Impact factors: Use and abuse. Perspectives in publishing no 1. Oxford: Elsevier.
Batista, PD, Campiteli, MG, Kinouchi, O, Martinez, AS. Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?. Scientometrics 2006 68 1 179–189 .
Bornmann, L. Mimicry in science?. Scientometrics 2011 86 1 173–177 .
Bornmann, L F de Moya Anegon 2011 Some interesting insights from aggregated data published in the World Report SIR 2010. Journal of Informetrics 5 3 486–488 .
Davis, P. (2010). Reference List length and citations: A spurious relationship. Retrieved on August 1, 2011, from http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2010/08/18/reference-list-length-and-citations-a-spurious-relationship/.
Egghe, L. The influence of merging on h-type indices. Journal of Informetrics 2008 2 3 252–262 .
Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (1990). Introduction to informetrics: Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science. Elsevier. Retrieved on November 21, 2011, from http://hdl.handle.net/1942/587.
Egghe, L, Rousseau, R. An informetric model for the Hirsch-index. Scientometrics 2006 69 1 121–129 .
Franceschini, F, Galetto, M, Maisano, D 2007 Management by measurement: Designing key indicators and performance measurements Springer Berlin.
Franceschini, F, Maisano, D. Analysis of the Hirsch index's operational properties. European Journal of Operational Research 2010 203 2 494–504 .
Franceschini, F, Maisano, D. The Hirsch spectrum: A novel tool for analysing scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics. 2010 4 1 64–73 .
Franceschini, F, Maisano, D. The citation triad: An overview of a scientist's publication output based on Ferrers diagrams. Journal of Informetrics 2010 4 4 503–511 .
Franceschini, F, Maisano, D. Bibliometric positioning of scientific manufacturing journals: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics 2011 86 2 463–485 .
Garfield, E 1979 Citation indexing. Its theory and application in science, technology and humanities Wiley New York.
Garfield, E. Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool?. Scientometrics 1979 1 4 359–375 .
Garfield, E. (2005). Agony and the ecstasy—the history and meaning of the impact factor. In Proceedings of the international congress on peer review and biomedical publication. Chicago, USA, September 16, 2005.
Glänzel, W, Schubert, A, Thijs, B, Debackere, K. A priori vs. a posteriori normalisation of citation indicators. The case of journal ranking. Scientometrics 2011 87 2 415–424.
Guns, R, Rousseau, R. New journal impact indicators take references into account: A comparison. ISSI Newsletter 2010 6 1 9–14.
Harzing, AW R van der Wal 2008 Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8 11 61–73 .
Haslam, N, Ban, L, Kaufmann, L, Loughnan, S, Peters, K, Whelan, J, Wilson, S. What makes an article influential? Predicting impact in social and personality psychology. Scientometrics 2008 76 1 169–185 .
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 16569–16572.
Iglesias, JE, Pecharromán, C. Scaling the h-index for different scientific ISI fields. Scientometrics 2007 73 3 303–320 .
Jackson, MO, Rogers, BW. Meeting strangers and friends of friends: How random are social networks?. American Economic Review 2007 97 3 890–915 .
JCQAR—Joint Committee on Quantitative Assessment of Research. (2010). Citation statistics. Retrieved on August 1, 2011, from http://www.mathunion.org/fileadmin/IMU/Report/CitationStatistics.pdf.
Kochen, M 1974 Principles of information retrieval Los Angeles Melville 21.
Kosmulski, M. Successful papers: A new idea in evaluation of scientific output. Journal of Informetrics 2011 5 3 481–485 .
Krampen, G. Acceleration of citing behavior after the millennium? Exemplary bibliometric reference analyses for psychology journals. Scientometrics 2010 83 2 507–513 .
Larivière, V., Archambault, É., Gingras, Y., & Wallace, M. L. (2008). The fall of uncitedness. In Book of abstracts of the 10th international conference on science and technology indicators (ISSI) (pp. 279–282). Vienna: Austrian Research Centers GmbH.
Leydesdorff, L, Bornmann, L. Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors: An alternative research design with policy implications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2011 62 11 2133–2146 .
Leydesdorff, L, Opthof, T. Normalization at the field level: Fractional counting of citations. Journal of Informetrics 2010 4 4 644–646 .
Leydesdorff, L, Shin, JC. How to evaluate universities in terms of their relative citation impacts: Fractional counting of citations and the normalization of differences among disciplines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2011 62 6 1146–1155 .
Moed, HF. Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics 2010 4 3 265–277 .
Moed, HF. CWTS crown indicator measures citation impact of a research group's publication oeuvre. Journal of Informetrics 2010 3 3 436–438 .
Pinski, G, Narin, F. Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics. Information Processing and Management 1976 12 5 197–312 .
Ravichandra Rao, IK 2011 Relations among the number of Citations, references and authors: Revisited. proceedings of COLLNET 2011, 7th international conference on webometrics, informetrics and scientometrics (WIS), 20–23 September, 2011 Istanbul Turkey.
Roberts, FS 1979 Measurement theory: With applications to decisionmaking, utility, and the social sciences. Encyclopedia of mathematics and its applications 7 Addison-Wesley Reading, MA.
Rousseau, R. New developments related to the Hirsch index. Science Focus 2006 1 4 23–25.
Rousseau, R., & Ye, F. Y. (2011). A simple impact measure and its evolution over time. Journal of Library & Information Studies, 9(2).
Small, H. On the shoulders of Robert Merton: Towards a normative theory of citation. Scientometrics 2004 60 1 71–79 .
Small, H, Sweeney, E. Clustering the science citation index using co-citations I. A comparison of methods. Scientometrics 1985 7 3–6 391–409 .
Waltman, L NJ van Eck TN Van Leeuwen Visser, MS AFJ Van Raan 2011 Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations. Journal of Informetrics 5 1 37–47 .
Waltman, L, Yan, E NJ van Eck 2011 A recursive field-normalized bibliometric performance indicator: An application to the field of library and information science. Scientometrics 89 1 301–314 .
Williamson, JR. My h-index turns 40: My midlife crisis of impact. ACS Chemical Biology 2009 4 5 311–313 .
Zhou, P, Leydesdorff, L. Fractional counting of citations in research evaluation: A cross- and interdisciplinary assessment of the Tsinghua University in Beijing. Journal of Informetrics 2011 5 3 360–368 .
Zitt, M. Citing-side normalization of journal impact: A robust variant of the Audience Factor. Journal of Informetrics 2010 4 3 392–406 .
Zitt, M, Small, H. Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting: The audience factor. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2008 59 11 1856–1860 .