View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Production Systems and Business Economics (DISPEA), Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129, Torino, Italy
Restricted access

Abstract

Among the most recent bibliometric indicators for normalizing the differences among fields of science in terms of citation behaviour, Kosmulski (J Informetr 5(3):481–485, ) proposed the NSP (number of successful paper) index. According to the authors, NSP deserves much attention for its great simplicity and immediate meaning—equivalent to those of the h-index—while it has the disadvantage of being prone to manipulation and not very efficient in terms of statistical significance. In the first part of the paper, we introduce the success-index, aimed at reducing the NSP-index's limitations, although requiring more computing effort. Next, we present a detailed analysis of the success-index from the point of view of its operational properties and a comparison with the h-index's ones. Particularly interesting is the examination of the success-index scale of measurement, which is much richer than the h-index's. This makes success-index much more versatile for different types of analysis—e.g., (cross-field) comparisons of the scientific output of (1) individual researchers, (2) researchers with different seniority, (3) research institutions of different size, (4) scientific journals, etc.

  • Amin, M., & Mabe, M. (2000). Impact factors: Use and abuse. Perspectives in publishing no 1. Oxford: Elsevier.

  • Batista, PD, Campiteli, MG, Kinouchi, O, Martinez, AS. Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?. Scientometrics 2006 68 1 179189 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bornmann, L. Mimicry in science?. Scientometrics 2011 86 1 173177 .

  • Bornmann, L F de Moya Anegon 2011 Some interesting insights from aggregated data published in the World Report SIR 2010. Journal of Informetrics 5 3 486488 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davis, P. (2010). Reference List length and citations: A spurious relationship. Retrieved on August 1, 2011, from http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2010/08/18/reference-list-length-and-citations-a-spurious-relationship/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Egghe, L. The influence of merging on h-type indices. Journal of Informetrics 2008 2 3 252262 .

  • Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (1990). Introduction to informetrics: Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science. Elsevier. Retrieved on November 21, 2011, from http://hdl.handle.net/1942/587.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Egghe, L, Rousseau, R. An informetric model for the Hirsch-index. Scientometrics 2006 69 1 121129 .

  • Franceschini, F, Galetto, M, Maisano, D 2007 Management by measurement: Designing key indicators and performance measurements Springer Berlin.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Franceschini, F, Maisano, D. Analysis of the Hirsch index's operational properties. European Journal of Operational Research 2010 203 2 494504 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Franceschini, F, Maisano, D. The Hirsch spectrum: A novel tool for analysing scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics. 2010 4 1 6473 .

  • Franceschini, F, Maisano, D. The citation triad: An overview of a scientist's publication output based on Ferrers diagrams. Journal of Informetrics 2010 4 4 503511 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Franceschini, F, Maisano, D. Bibliometric positioning of scientific manufacturing journals: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics 2011 86 2 463485 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Garfield, E 1979 Citation indexing. Its theory and application in science, technology and humanities Wiley New York.

  • Garfield, E. Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool?. Scientometrics 1979 1 4 359375 .

  • Garfield, E. (2005). Agony and the ecstasy—the history and meaning of the impact factor. In Proceedings of the international congress on peer review and biomedical publication. Chicago, USA, September 16, 2005.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Glänzel, W, Schubert, A, Thijs, B, Debackere, K. A priori vs. a posteriori normalisation of citation indicators. The case of journal ranking. Scientometrics 2011 87 2 415424.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Guns, R, Rousseau, R. New journal impact indicators take references into account: A comparison. ISSI Newsletter 2010 6 1 914.

  • Harzing, AW R van der Wal 2008 Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8 11 6173 .

  • Haslam, N, Ban, L, Kaufmann, L, Loughnan, S, Peters, K, Whelan, J, Wilson, S. What makes an article influential? Predicting impact in social and personality psychology. Scientometrics 2008 76 1 169185 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 1656916572.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Iglesias, JE, Pecharromán, C. Scaling the h-index for different scientific ISI fields. Scientometrics 2007 73 3 303320 .

  • Jackson, MO, Rogers, BW. Meeting strangers and friends of friends: How random are social networks?. American Economic Review 2007 97 3 890915 .

  • JCQAR—Joint Committee on Quantitative Assessment of Research. (2010). Citation statistics. Retrieved on August 1, 2011, from http://www.mathunion.org/fileadmin/IMU/Report/CitationStatistics.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kochen, M 1974 Principles of information retrieval Los Angeles Melville 21.

  • Kosmulski, M. Successful papers: A new idea in evaluation of scientific output. Journal of Informetrics 2011 5 3 481485 .

  • Krampen, G. Acceleration of citing behavior after the millennium? Exemplary bibliometric reference analyses for psychology journals. Scientometrics 2010 83 2 507513 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Larivière, V., Archambault, É., Gingras, Y., & Wallace, M. L. (2008). The fall of uncitedness. In Book of abstracts of the 10th international conference on science and technology indicators (ISSI) (pp. 279282). Vienna: Austrian Research Centers GmbH.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leydesdorff, L, Bornmann, L. Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors: An alternative research design with policy implications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2011 62 11 21332146 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leydesdorff, L, Opthof, T. Normalization at the field level: Fractional counting of citations. Journal of Informetrics 2010 4 4 644646 .

  • Leydesdorff, L, Shin, JC. How to evaluate universities in terms of their relative citation impacts: Fractional counting of citations and the normalization of differences among disciplines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2011 62 6 11461155 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moed, HF. Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics 2010 4 3 265277 .

  • Moed, HF. CWTS crown indicator measures citation impact of a research group's publication oeuvre. Journal of Informetrics 2010 3 3 436438 .

  • Pinski, G, Narin, F. Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics. Information Processing and Management 1976 12 5 197312 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ravichandra Rao, IK 2011 Relations among the number of Citations, references and authors: Revisited. proceedings of COLLNET 2011, 7th international conference on webometrics, informetrics and scientometrics (WIS), 20–23 September, 2011 Istanbul Turkey.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Roberts, FS 1979 Measurement theory: With applications to decisionmaking, utility, and the social sciences. Encyclopedia of mathematics and its applications 7 Addison-Wesley Reading, MA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rousseau, R. New developments related to the Hirsch index. Science Focus 2006 1 4 2325.

  • Rousseau, R., & Ye, F. Y. (2011). A simple impact measure and its evolution over time. Journal of Library & Information Studies, 9(2).

  • Small, H. On the shoulders of Robert Merton: Towards a normative theory of citation. Scientometrics 2004 60 1 7179 .

  • Small, H, Sweeney, E. Clustering the science citation index using co-citations I. A comparison of methods. Scientometrics 1985 7 3–6 391409 .

  • Waltman, L NJ van Eck TN Van Leeuwen Visser, MS AFJ Van Raan 2011 Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations. Journal of Informetrics 5 1 3747 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Waltman, L, Yan, E NJ van Eck 2011 A recursive field-normalized bibliometric performance indicator: An application to the field of library and information science. Scientometrics 89 1 301314 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Williamson, JR. My h-index turns 40: My midlife crisis of impact. ACS Chemical Biology 2009 4 5 311313 .

  • Zhou, P, Leydesdorff, L. Fractional counting of citations in research evaluation: A cross- and interdisciplinary assessment of the Tsinghua University in Beijing. Journal of Informetrics 2011 5 3 360368 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zitt, M. Citing-side normalization of journal impact: A robust variant of the Audience Factor. Journal of Informetrics 2010 4 3 392406 .

  • Zitt, M, Small, H. Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting: The audience factor. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2008 59 11 18561860 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Manuscript submission: http://www.editorialmanager.com/scim/

  • Impact Factor (2019): 2.867
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2019): 1.210
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2019): 106
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Computer Science Apllications
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Library and Information Sciences
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Impact Factor (2018): 2.770
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2018): 1.113
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2018): 95
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q1 Library and Information Sciences
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q1 Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer

Scientometrics
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1978
Volumes
per Year
4
Issues
per Year
12
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0138-9130 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2861 (Online)