This paper develops a structured comparison among a sample of European researchers in the field of Production Technology and Manufacturing Systems, on the basis of scientific publications and patents. Researchers are evaluated and compared by a variegated set of indicators concerning (1) the output of individual researchers and (2) that of groups of researchers from the same country. While not claiming to be exhaustive, the results of this preliminary study provide a rough indication of the publishing and patenting activity of researchers in the field of interest, identifying (dis)similarities between different countries. Of particular interest is a proposal for aggregating analysis results by means of maps based on publication and patent indicators. A large amount of empirical data are presented and discussed.
Agrawal, A, Henderson, R. Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science—Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer 2002 48 1 44–60.
Bar-Ilan, J. Citations to the ‘introduction to informetrics’ indexed by WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics 2010 82 3 495–506 .
Bornmann, L, Mutz, R, Neuhaus, C, Daniel, HD. Citation counts for research evaluation: Standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 2008 8 1 93–102 .
Breschi, S, Catalini, C. Tracing the links between science and technology: An exploratory analysis of scientists’ and inventors’ networks. Research Policy 2010 39 1 14–26 .
Calderini, M, Franzoni, C, Vezzulli, A. The unequal benefits of academic patenting for science and engineering research. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2009 56 1 16–30 .
Cheng, YH, Kuan, FY, Chuang, SC. Profitability decided by patent quality? An empirical study of the U.S. semiconductor industry. Scientometrics 2010 82 1 175–183 .
CIRP. (2011). Organization website. Retrieved 10 April, 2011 from http://www.cirp.net.
Criscuolo, P, Verspagen, B. Does it matter where patent citations come from? Inventor vs. examiner citations in European patents. Research Policy 2008 37 10 1892–1908 .
Czarnitzki, D, Glänzel, W, Hussinger, K. Patent and publication activities of german professors: An empirical assessment of their co-activity. Research Evaluation 2007 16 4 311–319 .
Egghe, L. (2010). The Hirsch-index and related impact measures. In B. Cronin (ed), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) (Vol. 44). ISBN 978-1-57387-371-0.
Franceschini, F, Galetto, M, Maisano, D 2007 Management by measurement: Designing key indicators and performance measurement systems Springer Verlag Berlin.
Franceschini, F, Maisano, D. Analysis of the Hirsch index's operational properties. European Journal of Operational Research 2010 203 2 494–504 .
Franceschini, F, Maisano, D. The Hirsch spectrum: A novel tool for analysing scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics 2010 4 1 64–73 .
Franceschini, F, Maisano, D. Bibliometric positioning of scientific manufacturing journals: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics 2011 86 2 463–485 .
Franceschini, F, Maisano, D. Structured evaluation of the scientific output of academic research groups by recent h-based indicators. Journal of Informetrics 2011 5 1 64–74 .
Geuna, A, Nesta, LJJ. University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence. Research Policy 2006 35 6 790–807 .
Guan, J. C., & Gao, X. (2009). Exploring the h-index at patent level. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (1), 35–40.
Guan, J, He, Y. Patent-bibliometric analysis on the Chinese science—Technology linkages. Scientometrics 2007 72 3 403–425 .
Hirsch, J.E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (Vol. 102, pp. 16569–16572.
Labbé, C. Ike Antkare one of the great stars in the scientific firmament. ISSI Newsletter 2010 6 2 48–52.
Lazaridis, T. Ranking university departments using the mean h-index. Scientometrics 2010 82 2 211–216 .
Mattson, P, Laget, P, Nilsson, A, Sundberg, CJ. Intra-EU vs. extra-EU scientific co-publication patterns in EU. Scientometrics 2008 75 3 555–574 .
Molinari, A, Molinari, JF. A new methodology for ranking scientific institutions. Scientometrics 2008 75 1 163–174 .
Nagpaul, PS, Roy, S. Constructing multi-objective measure of research performance. Scientometrics 2003 56 3 383–402 .
Rousseau, R. (2006) New developments related to the Hirsch index. E-prints in Library and Information Science (ELIS). Retrieved April 10, 2011 www.eprints.rclis.org.
Schubert, A. Successive h-indices. Scientometrics 2007 70 1 201–205 .
Scopus—Elsevier. (2011). Retrieved April 10, 2011 from www.info.scopus.com.
Shelton, R.D. & Leydesdorff, L. (2011) Publish or patent: Bibliometric evidence for empirical trade-offs in national funding strategies. 13th Conference of International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Durban, July 4–8.
B van Looy Callaert, J, Debackere, K. Publication and patent behavior of academic researchers: Conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing?. Research Policy 2006 35 4 596–608 .
Wong, PK, Singh, A. University patenting activities and their link to the quantity and quality of scientific publications. Scientometrics 2010 83 1 271–294 .