Despite the extensive studies conducted in the field of nanotechnology based on US patent data, the choice of a single database may impede a wider view of this technology frontier. Based on patent data from the Derwent Innovation Index database that covers the data of 41 major patent offices, we review the development of nanotechnology patenting from the dimensions of patenting authority and technological classification. We find that a small number of countries dominating the technology have similar technological diversity in terms of nanotechnology patents. After the discussion and summary of the citation modes and citation rate curve, we construct the patent citation networks at the patent document level and discuss the distinctive transnational citation patterns. We then use Search Path Count Method to extract the technological trajectory, where we find very high selectiveness. In the final section of this paper, we discover the small world phenomenon in the citation networks, which is widely investigated in undirected networks such as co-authorship networks, but rarely touched in citation networks due to the limitations of the presumptions. We propose the reachable path length and citation clustering in the revised small world model for acyclic directed networks and provide the realistic meaning of the new measures.
Braun, T, Schubert, A, Zsindely, S. Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance. Scientometrics 1997 38 2 281–292 .
Chang, PL, Wu, CC, Leu, HJ. Using patent analyses to monitor the technological trends in an emerging field of technology: A case of carbon nanotube field emission display. Scientometrics 2010 82:5–19 .
Chen, ZF, Guan, JC. The impact of small world on innovation: An empirical study of 16 countries. Journal of Informetrics 2010 4:97–106 .
Darby, M. R., & Zucker, L. G. (2003). Grilichesian breakthroughs: Inventions of methods of inventing and firm entry in nanotechnology. NBER Working Paper No. 9825, p. 64.
Dibiaggio, L, Nesta, L. Patents statistics, knowledge specialization and the organization of competencies. Revue d’économie industrielle 2005 110:103–126 .
Dosi, G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy 1982 11:147–162 .
Easley, D, Kleinberg, J 2010 Networks, crowds and markets Cambridge University Press New York.
Fleming, L, King, C, Juda, AI. Small world and regional innovation. Organizational Science 2007 18:938–954 .
Fleming, L, Mingo, S, Chen, D. Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Administrative Science Quarterly 2007 52 3 443–475.
Guan, JC, Liu, SZ. Comparing regional innovative capacities of PR China based on data analysis of the national patents. International Journal of Technology Management 2005 32:225–245 .
Guan, JC, Ma, N. China's emerging presence in nanoscience and nanotechnology: A comparative bibliometric study of several nanoscience ‘giants’. Research Policy 2007 36 6 880–886 .
Huang, Z, Chen, H, Yip, A, Ng, G, Guo, F, Chen, ZK, Roco, MC. Longitudinal patent analysis for nanoscale science and engineering: Country, institution and technology field. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 2003 5:333–363 .
Huang, C, Notten, A, Rasters, N. Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: A review of social science studies and search strategies. Journal of Technology Transfer 2011 36:145–172 .
Hummon, N. P., & Doreian, P. (1989). Connectivity in a citation network - the development of DNA theory. Social Networks, 11 (1), 39–63.
Hung, SW, Wang, AP. Examining the small world phenomenon in the patent citation network: A case study of the radio frequency identification (RFID) network. Scientometrics 2010 82:121–134 .
Islam, N, Miyazaki, K. An empirical analysis of nanotechnology research domains. Techovation 2010 30:229–237 .
Karki, MMS. Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool. World Patent Information 1997 19 4 269–272 .
Khoury, TA, Pleggenkuhle-Miles, EG. Shared inventions and the evolution of capabilities: Examining the biotechnology industry. Research Policy 2011 40:943–956 .
Kostoff, R. N., Koytcheff, R. G., & Lau, C. G. Y. (2008). Structure of the nanoscience and nanotechnology applications literature. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33 (5), 472–484.
Leydesdorff, L. Theories of citation?. Scientometrics 1998 43 1 5–25 .
Leydesdorff, L. Patent classifications as indicators of intellectual organization. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2008 59 10 1582–1597 .
Li, X, Chen, H, Huang, Z, Roco, MC. Patent citation network in nanotechnology (1976–2004). Journal of Nanoparticle Research 2007 9:337–352 .
Liu, LW, Zhang, LD. Nanotechnology in China-Now and in the future. Nanotechnology Law Business 2005 2 4 397–403.
Liu, X, Zhang, PZ, Li, X, Chen, HC, Dang, Y, Larson, C, Roco, MC, Wang, XW. Trends for nanotechnology development in China, Russia and India. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 2009 11:1845–1866 .
Marinova, D, McAleer, M. Nanotechnology strength indicators: International rankings based on US patents. Nanotechnology 2003 14:R1–R7 .
Medina, CC, Noyons, ECM. Combining mapping and citation network analysis for a better understanding of the scientific development: The case of the absorptive capacity field. Journal of Informetrics 2008 2:272–279 .
Meyer, M. What do we know about innovation in nanotechnology? Some propositions about an emerging field between hype and path-dependency. Scientometrics 2007 70 3 779–810 .
Michel, J, Bettels, B. Patent citation analysis: A closer look at the basic input data from patent search reports. Scientometrics 2001 51 1 185–201 .
Mina, A, Ramlogana, R, Tampubolon, G, Metcalfe, JS. Mapping evolutionary trajectories: Applications to the growth and transformation of medical knowledge. Research Policy 2007 36:789–806 .
Mogoutov, A, Kahane, B. Data search strategy for science and technology emergence: A scalable and evolutionary query for nanotechnology tracking. Research Policy 2007 36:893–903 .
Nerka, A, Shane, S. Determinants of invention commercialization: An empirical examination of academically sourced inventions. Strategic Management Journal 2007 28:1155–1166 .
Nooy, WD, Mrvar, A, Batagelj, V 2005 Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek Cambridge University Press New York .
Pilkington, A, Meredith, J. The evolution of the intellectual structure of operations management—1980–2006: A citation/co-citation analysis. Journal of Operations Management 2009 27:185–202 .
Porter, AL, Youtie, J, Shapira, P, Schoeneck, DJ. Refining search terms for nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Ressearch 2008 10:715–728 .
Rafols, I, Meyer, M. How cross-disciplinary is bionanotechnology? Explorations in the specialty of molecular motors. Scientometrics 2007 70 3 633–650 .
Roco, M. C. (2007). The NNI: Past, present and future. In W. A. Goddard, D. Brenner, S. E. Lyshevski, & G. J. Iafrate (eds.), Handbook on nanoscience, engineering and technology (pp. 0301–0326). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Sampat, B. N. (2004). Examining patent examination: An analysis of examiner and applicant generated prior art. Working Paper.
Schilling, MA, Phelps, CC. Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Science 2007 53:1113–1126 .
Stembridge, B. International patent classification in Derwent databases. World Patent Information 1999 21:169–177 .
Trajtenberg, M. A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the values of inventions. RAND Journal of Economics 1990 21:172–187 .
Trajtenberg, M, Henderson, R, Jaffe, AB 2002 Patents, citations, and innovations—A window on the knowledge economy MIT Press Cambridge, MA.
Uzzi, B, Amaral, LA, Tsochas, FR. Small-world networks and management science research: A review. European Management Review 2007 4:77–91 .
Uzzi, B, Spiro, J. Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. American Journal of Sociology 2005 111:447–504 .
Verspagen, B. Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks: A study on the history of fuel cell research. Advances in Complex Systems 2007 10 1 93–115 .
Wang, G. B., & Guan, J. C. (2010). The role of patenting activity for scientific research: A study of academic inventors from China's nanotechnology. Journal of Informetrics, 4 (3), 338–350.
Wang, JC, Chiang, CH, Lin, SW. Network structure of innovation: Can brokerage or closure predict patent quality?. Scientometrics 2010 84:735–748 .
Watts, DJ, Strogatz, SH. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 1998 393:440–442 .
Wong, PK, Ho, YP, Chan, CK. Internationalization and evolution of application areas of an emerging technology: The case of nanotechnology. Scientometrics 2007 70 3 715–737 .
Yu, G, Wang, MY, Yu, DR. Characterizing knowledge diffusion of Nanoscience & Nanotechnology by citation analysis. Scientometrics 2010 84:81–97 .
Zhao, Q. J., & Guan, J. C. (2011). International collaboration of three ‘giants’ with the G7 countries in emerging nanobiopharmaceuticals. Scientometrics, 87 (1), 159–170.
Zitt, M, Bassecoulard, E. Delineating complex scientific fields by an hybrid lexical-citation method: An application to nanosciences. Information Processing and Management 2006 42:1513–1531 .