View More View Less
  • 1 College of Information and Computer Engineering, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, People's Republic of China
  • 2 School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, People's Republic of China
  • 3 School of Power Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, People's Republic of China
Restricted access

Abstract

In this paper, the machine learning tools were used to identify key features influencing citation impact. Both the papers’ external and quality information were considered in constructing papers’ feature space. Based on the feature space, the soft fuzzy rough set was used to generate a series of associated feature subsets. Then, the KNN classifier was used to find the feature subset with the best classification performance. The results show that citation impact could be predicted by objectively assessed factors. Both the papers’ quality and external features, mainly represented as the reputation of the first author, are contributed to future citation impact.

  • Aksnes, DW. Characteristics of highly cited papers. Research Evaluation 2003 12 3 159170 .

  • Bornmann, L, Daniel, HD. What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation 2008 64 1 4580 .

  • Burrell, QL. Stochastic modelling of the first-citation distribution. Scientometrics 2001 52:312 .

  • Burrell, QL. On the nth-citation distribution and obsolescence. Scientometrics 2002 53:309323 .

  • Burrell, QL. Will this paper ever be cited?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2002 53:232235 .

  • Burrell, QL. Predicting future citation behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2003 54 5 372378 .

  • Case, DO, Higgins, GM. How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 2000 51 7 635645 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cover, T. M., & Hart, P. E. (1967). Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Transaction on Information Theory, IT-13(1), 2127.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Danell, R. Can the quality of scientific work be predicted using information on the author's track record?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2011 62 1 5060 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dubois, D, Prade, H. Rough fuzzy sets and fuzzy rough sets. General Systems 1990 17:191209 .

  • Fu, L, Aliferis, C. Using content-based and bibliometric features for machine learning models to predict citation counts in the biomedical literature. Scientometrics 2010 85:257270 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Glänzel, W. On the reliability of predictions based on stochastic citation processes. Scientometrics 1997 40 3 481492 .

  • Glänzel, W, Rinia, EJ, Brocken, MGM. A bibliometric study of highly cited European physics papers in the 80s. Research Evaluation 1995 5 2 113122.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Glänzel, W, Schubert, A. Predictive aspects of a stochastic model for citation processes. Information Processing and Management 1995 31 1 6980.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Glänzel, W, Schlemmer, B, Thijs, B. Better late than never? On the chance to become highly cited only beyond the standard bibliometric time horizon. Scientometrics 2003 58 3 571586 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hewings, A, Lillis, T, Vladimirou, D. Who's citing whose writings? A corpus based study of citations as interpersonal resource in English medium national and English medium international journals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2010 9 2 102115 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hirsch, JE. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 2005 102 46 1656916572 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hu, QH, An, S, Yu, DR. Soft fuzzy rough sets for robust feature evaluation and selection. Information Sciences 2010 180:43844400 .

  • Kim, K. The motivation for citing specific references by social scientists in Korea: The phenomenon of co-existing references. Scientometrics 2004 59 1 7993 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Laband, DN, Piette, MJ. Favoritism versus search for good papers: Empirical evidence regarding the behavior of journal editors. Journal of Political Economy 1994 102:194203 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Levitt, JM, Thelwall, M. Is multidisciplinary research more highly cited? A macrolevel study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2008 59 12 19731984 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Levitt, JM, Thelwall, M. The most highly cited Library and Information Science articles: Interdisciplinarity, first authors and citation patterns. Scientometrics 2009 78 1 4567 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Merton, RK. The Matthew effect in science. Science 1968 159:5663 .

  • Penas, CS, Willett, P. Gender differences in publication and citation counts in librarianship and information science research. Journal of Information Science 2006 32 5 480485 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rong, T, Martin, AS. Author-rated importance of cited references in biology and psychology publications. Journal of Documentation 2008 64 2 246272 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sagi, I, Yechiam, E. Amusing titles in scientific journals and article citation. Journal of Information Science 2008 34 5 680687 .

  • HP Van Dalen Henkens, K. What makes a scientific article influential? The case of demographers. Scientometrics 2001 50:455482 .

  • HP Van Dalen Henkens, K. Signals in science-on the importance of signaling in gaining attention in science. Scientometrics 2005 64 2 209233 .

  • Wang, MY, Yu, G, Yu, DR. Mining typical features for highly cited papers. Scientometrics 2011 87 3 695706 .

  • Xia, JF, Myers, RL, Wihoite, SK. Multiple open access availability and citation impact. Journal of Information Science 2011 37 1 1928 .