View More View Less
  • 1 CEF.UP, Faculdade de Economia, Universidade do Porto, INESC TEC, OBEGEF, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-464, Porto, Portugal
  • 2 Faculdade de Economia, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
Restricted access

Abstract

The study of university–industry (U–I) relations has been the focus of growing interest in the literature. However, to date, a quantitative overview of the existing literature in this field has yet to be accomplished. This study intends to fill this gap through the use of bibliometric techniques. By using three different yet interrelated databases—a database containing the articles published on U–I links, which encompass 534 articles published between 1986 and 2011; a ‘roots’ database, which encompasses over 20,000 references to the articles published on U–I relations; and a ‘influences’ database which includes more than 15,000 studies that cited the articles published on U–I relations—we obtained the following results: (1) ‘Academic spin offs’, ‘Scientific and technological policies’ and (to a greater extent) ‘Knowledge Transfer Channels’ are topics in decline; (2) ‘Characteristics of universities, firms and scientists’, along with ‘Regional spillovers’, show remarkable growth, and ‘Measures and indicators’ can be considered an emergent topic; (3) clear tendency towards ‘empirical’ works, although ‘appreciative and empirical’ papers constitute the bulk of this literature; (4) the multidisciplinary nature of the intellectual roots of the U–I literature—an interesting blending of neoclassical economics (focused on licensing, knowledge transfer and high-tech entrepreneurship) and heterodox approaches (mainly related to systems of innovation) is observed in terms of intellectual roots; (5) the influence of the U–I literature is largely concentrated on the industrialized world and on the research area of innovation and technology (i.e., some ‘scientific endogamy’ is observed).

  • Abramo, G, D'Angelo, CA F Di Costa Solazzi, M. University–industry collaboration in Italy: a bibliometric examination. Technovation 2009 29:498507 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Abramo, G, D'Angelo, CA, Solazzi, M. A bibliometric tool to assess the regional dimension of university–industry research collaboration. Scientometrics 2012 91:955975 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Agrawal, A. University-to-industry knowledge transfer: literature review and unanswered questions. International Journal of Management Reviews 2001 3 4 285302 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anderson, TR, Daim, TU, Lavoie, FF. Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer. Technovation 2007 27:306318 .

  • Audretsch, DB, Stephan, PE. Company-scientist locational links: the case of Biotechnology. American Economic Review 1996 86 3 641652.

  • Bains, W. How academics can make (extra) money out of their science. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology 2005 11 4 353363 .

  • Balconi, M, Laboranti, A. University–industry interactions in applied research: the case of microelectronics. Research Policy 2006 5:16161630 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bekkers, R, Freitas, IMB. Analyzing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: to what degree do sectors also matter?. Research Policy 2008 37:18371853 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bercovitz, J, Feldman, M. Technology transfer: a conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development. Journal of Technology Transfer 2006 31:175188 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Breznitz, SM, O'Shea, RP, Allen, TJ. University commercialization strategies in the development of regional bioclusters. Journal of Product Innovation Management 2008 25:129142 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Broström, A, McKelvey, M, Sandström, C. Investing in localized relationships with universities: what are the benefits for R&D subsidiaries of multinational enterprises?. Industry and Innovation 2009 16 1 5978 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cantner, U, Graf, H. The network of innovators in Jenna: an application of social network analysis. Research Policy 2006 35:463480 .

  • Coccia, M. Spatial metrics of the technological transfer. Analysis and Strategic Management 2004 16 1 3151 .

  • Cohen, WM, Nelson, RR, Walsh, JP. Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science 2002 48 1 123 .

  • Colyvas, J, Crow, M, Gelijns, A, Mazzoleni, R, Nelson, RR, Rosenberg, N, Sampat, BN. How do university inventions get into practice?. Management Science 2002 48 1 6172 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Crowe, JA, Goldberg, JR. University–industry relationships in colleges of agriculture and life sciences: the role of women faculty. Rural Sociology 2009 74 4 498524 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cruz, S, Teixeira, AAC. The evolution of the cluster literature: shedding light on the regional studies-regional science debate. Regional Studies 2010 44 9 12631288 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Decter, MH. Comparative review of UK-USA industry-university relationships. Education and Training 2009 51 8/9 624634 .

  • D Di Gregorio Shane, S. Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others?. Research Policy 2003 32:209227 .

  • Du, Y., & Teixeira, A.A.C. (2012). A bibliometric account of Chinese economics research through the lens of the China Economic Review. China Economic Review, forthcoming. doi: .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Edler, J, Fier, H, Grimpe, C. International scientist mobility and the locus of knowledge and technology transfer. Research Policy 2011 40 6 791805 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Etzkowitz, H. The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages. Research Policy 1998 27 8 823833 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Etzkowitz, H, Leydesdorff, L. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy 2000 29 2 109123 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fabrizio, KR. Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation. Research Policy 2009 38 2 255267 .

  • Fagerberg, J, Verspagen, B. Innovation studies—The emerging structure of a new scientific field. Research Policy 2009 38:218233 .

  • Filatotchev, I, Liu, X, Lud, J, Wright, M. Knowledge spillovers through human mobility across national borders: evidence from Zhongguancun Science Park in China. Research Policy 2011 40 3 453462 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fini, R, Grimaldi, R, Santoni, S, Sobrero, M. Complements or substitutes? The role of universities and local context in supporting the creation of academic spin-offs. Research Policy 2011 40 8 11131127 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fleming, L C King III Juda, A 2004 Small worlds and innovation Harvard Business School Mimeo.

  • Fontana, R, Geuna, A, Matt, M. Factors affecting university–industry R&D projects: the importance of searching, screening and signaling. Research Policy 2006 35:309323 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Garfield, E. (1994). The relationship between citing and cited publications: a question of relatedness. Current Contents, 15. http://scientific.thomson.com/free/essays/useofcitationdatabases/relationship/. Accessed on July 2012.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Giuliani, E, Arza, V. What drives the formation of ‘valuable’ university–industry linkages?. Research Policy 2009 38:906921 .

  • Goyal, S M van der Leji Moraga-González, JL. Economics: an emerging small world. Journal of Political Economy 2006 114 2 403412 .

  • Grandi, A, Grimaldi, R. Exploring the networking characteristics of new venture founding teams. Small Business Economics 2003 21:329341 .

  • Gübeli, MH, Doloreux, D. An empirical study of university spin-off development. European Journal of Innovation Management 2005 8 3 269282 .

  • Gulbrandsen, M, Mowery, D, Feldman, M. Introduction to the special section: heterogeneity and university–industry relations. Research Policy 2011 40:15 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hemmert, M, Okamuro, H, Bstieler, L, Ruth, K. An inquiry into the status and nature of university–industry research collaborations in Japan and Korea. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics 2008 49:163180.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Henderson, R, Jaffe, AB, Trajtenberg, M. Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965–1988. Review of Economics and Statistics 1998 80 1 119127 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Johansson, M, Jacob, M, Hellström, T. The strength of strong ties: university spin-offs and the significance of historical relations. Journal of Technology Transfer 2005 30:271286 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kinsella, R, McBrierty, V. Campus companies and the emerging techno-academic paradigm. Technovation 1997 17 5 245252 .

  • Klincewicz, K, Miyazaki, K. Sectoral systems of innovation in Asia. The case of software research activities. International Journal of Technology Management 2011 53 2/3/4 161189 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koschatzky, K, Stahlecker, T. The emergence of new modes of R&D services in Germany. The Service Industries Journal 2010 30 5 685700 .

  • Krücken, G, Meier, F, Müller, A. Linkages to the civil society as ‘leisure time activities’? Experiences at a German university. Science and Public Policy 2009 36 2 139144 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lam, A. Work roles and careers of R&D scientists in network organizations. Industrial Relations 2005 44 2 242275.

  • Lee, YS. ‘Technology transfer’ and the research university: a search for the boundaries of university–industry collaboration. Research Policy 1996 25:843863 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lee, K-J, Ohta, T, Kakehi, K. Formal boundary spanning by industry liaison offices and the changing pattern of university–industry cooperative research: the case of the University of Tokyo. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 2010 22 2 189206 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leydesdorff, L, Meyer, M. The scientometrics of a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations (Introduction to the topical issue). Scientometrics 2007 70 2 207222 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lhuillery, S, Pfister, E. R&D cooperation and failures in innovation projects: empirical evidence from French CIS data. Research Policy 2009 38 1 4557 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lindelöf, P, Löfsten, H. Science park location and new technology-based firms in Sweden—implications for strategy and performance. Small Business Economics 2003 20:245258 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lindelöf, P, Löfsten, H. Proximity as a resource base for competitive advantage: university–industry links for technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer 2004 29:311326 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Link, AN, Rothaermel, FT, Siegel, DS. University technology transfer: an introduction to the Special Issue. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2008 55 1 58 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lockett, A, Wright, M, Franklin, S. Technology transfer and universities spin-out strategies. Small Business Economics 2003 20:185200 .

  • Lubango, LM, Pouris, A. Industry work experience and inventive capacity of South African academic researchers. Technovation 2007 27:788796 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marsili, O, Verspagen, B. Technology and the dynamics of industrial structures: an empirical mapping of Dutch manufacturing. Industrial and Corporate Change 2002 11 4 791815 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martinelli, A, Meyer, M N von Tunzelmann 2008 Becoming an entrepreneurial university? A case study of knowledge exchange relationships and faculty attitudes in a medium-sized, research-oriented university. Journal of Technology Transfer 33:259283 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meyer-Kramer, F, Schmoch, U. Science-based technologies: university–industry interaction in four fields. Research Policy 1998 27:835851 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Monjon, S, Waelbroeck, P. Assessing spillovers form universities to firms: evidence from French form-level data. International Journal of Industrial Organization 2003 21:12551270 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mowery, DC, Nelson, RR, Sampat, BN, Ziedonis, AA. The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. Universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980. Research Policy 2001 30:99119 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mueller, P. Exploring the knowledge filter: how entrepreneurship and university–industry relationships drive economic growth. Research Policy 2006 35:14991508 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Narin, F, Hamilton, KS, Olivastro, D. The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science. Research Policy 1997 26:317330 .

  • Nelson, RR 1993 National innovation systems: a comparative analysis Oxford University Press Oxford.

  • Nelson, RR, Winter, S 1982 An evolutionary theory of economic change Harvard University Press Cambridge.

  • O'Shea, RP, Allen, TJ, Chevalier, A, Roche, F. Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. Universities. Research Policy 2005 34:9941009 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Olds, K. Global assemblage: Singapore, foreign universities, and the construction of a “global education hub”. World Development 2007 35 6 959975 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Owen-Smith, J, Riccaboni, M, Pammolli, F, Powell, WW. A comparison of U.S. and European university–industry relations in the life sciences. Management Science 2002 48 1 2443 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Park, HW, Leydesdorff, L. Knowledge linkage structures in communication studies using citation analysis among communication journals. Scientometrics 2009 81 1 157175 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pazos, DR, Lopez, SF, Sandias, AR, Gonzalez, LO. Obstáculos para las spin-offs universitarias en España y Galicia. Revista Galega de Economia 2010 10 1 124.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pinheiro, L, Teixeira, AAC. Bridging university-firm and open innovation literature: a critical synthesis. Portuguese Journal of Management Studies 2010 15 3 124.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Plewa, C, Quester, P. Key drivers of university–industry relationships: the role of organisational compatibility and personal experience. Journal of Services Marketing 2007 21 5 370382 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Powers, JB, McDougall, PB. University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: a resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing 2005 20:291311 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pugatch, MP, Chu, R. The strength of pharmaceutical IPRs vis-à-vis foreign direct investment in clinical research: preliminary findings. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology 2011 17:308318 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ramos-Vielba, I, Fernández-Esquinas, M, Espinosa-de-los-Monteros, E. Measuring university–industry collaboration in a regional innovation system. Scientometrics 2009 84 3 15882861.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rosenberg, N, Nelson, RR. American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy 1994 23 3 323348 .

  • Rothaermel, FT, Agung, SD, Jiang, L. University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change 2007 16 4 691791 .

  • Salter, AJ, Martin, BR. The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review. Research Policy 2001 30:509532 .

  • Santoro, MD, Chakrabarti, AK. Firm size and technology centrality in industry-university interactions. Research Policy 2002 31:11631180 .

  • Schartinger, D, Rammer, C, Fischer, MM, Fröhilch, J. Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy 2002 31:303328 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shane, S. Encouraging university entrepreneurship? The effect of the Bayh-Dole Act on university patenting in the United States. Journal of Business Venturing 2004 19:127151 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shane, S, Stuart, T. Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science 2002 48 1 154170 .

  • Siegel, DS, Waldman, DA, Atwater, LE, Link, AN. Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university–industry collaboration. Journal of High Technology Management Research 2003 14:111133 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Silva, E, Teixeira, AAC. Surveying structural change: seminal contributions and a bibliometric account. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 2008 19:273300 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Silva, ST, Teixeira, AAC. On the divergence of evolutionary research paths in the past 50 years: a comprehensive bibliometric account. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 2009 19:605642 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Small, H. Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 2009 50 9 799813 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Swann, G.M.P. (2002). Innovative business and the science and technology base, Report for Department for Trade and Industry, UK, October.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Teixeira, AAC. Mapping the (in)visible college(s) in the field of entrepreneurship. Scientometrics 2011 89 1 136 .

  • Tijssen, RJW. Universities and industrially relevant science: towards measurement models and indicators of entrepreneurial orientation. Research Policy 2006 35:15691585 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Todorovic, ZW, McNaughton, RB, Guild, P. ENTRE-U: an entrepreneurial orientation scale for universities. Technovation 2011 31 2–3 128137 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • B Van Looy Landoni, P, Callaert, J B van Pottelsberghe Sapsalis, E, Debackere, K. Entrepreneurial effectiveness of European universities: an empirical assessment of antecedents and trade-offs. Research Policy 2011 40 4 553564 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vera, ER, Schupp, T. Network analysis in comparative social sciences. Comparative Education 2006 42 3 405429 .

  • Weintraub, R 2002 How economics became a mathematical science Duke University Press Durhman.

  • Wright, M, Birley, S, Mosey, S. Entrepreneurship and technology transfer (special edition). The Journal of Technology Transfer 2004 29 3–4 235246 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wright, M, Clarysse, B, Lockett, A, Knockaert, M. Mid-range universities’ linkages with industry: knowledge types and the role of intermediaries. Research Policy 2008 37:12051223 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wu, W. Managing and incentivizing research commercialization in Chinese Universities. Journal of Technology Transfer 2009 35:203224 .

  • Xiwei, Z, Xiangdong, Y. Science and technology policy reform and its impact on China's national innovation system. Technology in Society 2007 29:317325 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yusuf, S. Intermediating knowledge exchange between universities and businesses. Research Policy 2008 37:11671174 .

  • Zuccala, A. Modeling the Invisible College. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2006 55 2 152168 .

  • Zucker, LG, Darby, MR. Star scientists and institutional transformation: patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1996 93:1270912716 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zucker, LG, Darby, MR, Amstrong, JS. Commercializing knowledge: university science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in Biotechnology. Management Science 2002 48 1 138153 .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zucker, LG, Darby, MR, Brewer, MB. Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. Biotechnology enterprises. American Economic Review 1998 88 1 290306.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation