Authors:
Gregory A. Bryant Department of Communication Studies, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
UCLA Center for Behavior, Evolution, and Culture, Los Angeles, USA
Department of Communication Studies, Center for Behavior, Evolution, and Culture, University of California, Los Angeles, 2303 Rolfe Hall, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1563, USA

Search for other papers by Gregory A. Bryant in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Pierre Liénard Department of Anthropology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA

Search for other papers by Pierre Liénard in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
H. Clark Barrett Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
UCLA Center for Behavior, Evolution, and Culture, Los Angeles, USA

Search for other papers by H. Clark Barrett in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

When communicating with infants, caregivers often modulate their speech in an effort to make their communicative and informative intentions more clear. Infant-directed (ID) speech differs acoustically from adult-directed (AD) speech, and systematically varies according to different kinds of intentions. This way of speaking to infants is thought to be a species-specific adaptation, as research has documented highly similar patterns in ID speech across a variety of cultures. A recent study has also shown that people from an indigenous non-Western culture (Shuar of Amazonian Ecuador) can reliably discriminate ID speech from AD speech in a language they do not speak, and distinguish between four different intention categories (prohibition, attention, comfort, and approval). The current research attempted to replicate this finding in a traditional African population, the Turkana of northwestern Kenya. In three experiments, we found that Turkana adults were able to discriminate between ID and AD speech produced in English by American mothers, and they could also distinguish between several intention categories in both ID and AD speech. Signal detection analysis revealed that ID speech was marginally more discriminable than AD speech, but overall rate of intention recognition was similar across speech types. These results partially support the hypothesis that ID speech is universally recognizable due to the formfunction relationship between acoustic signals and their communicative purpose, but there were differences in performance between Turkana and Shuar that merit further investigation.

  • Y. Benjamini Y. Hochberg 1995 Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 57 1 289 300.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Broesch, T. and Bryant, G. A. (2011): Universals in infant-directed speech: Evidence from Fiji, Kenya, and US. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society, Montpellier, France.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • G. A. Bryant H. C. Barrett 2007 Recognizing intentions in infant directed speech: Evidence for universals Psychological Science 18 8 746 751.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • G. A. Bryant H. C. Barrett 2008 Vocal emotion recognition across disparate cultures Journal of Cognition and Culture 8 135 148.

  • G. Csibra 2010 Recognizing communicative intentions in infancy Mind & Language 25 2 141 168.

  • G. J. Dimmendaal 1983 The Turkana Language Holland Foris Publications.

  • A. Fernald T. Taeschner J. Dunn M. Papousek B. Boysson-bardies I. Fukui 1989 A cross-language study of prosodic modifications in mothers’ and fathers’ speech to preverbal infants Journal of Child Language 16 977 1001.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • A. Fernald 1993 Approval and disapproval: Infant responsiveness to vocal affect in familiar and unfamiliar languages Child Development 64 657 674.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • A. Fernald 1992 Maternal vocalizations to infants as biologically relevant signals: An evolutionary perspective J.H. Barkow L. Cosmides J. Tooby The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture Oxford University Press Oxford.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • D.L. Grieser P.K. Kuhl 1988 Maternal speech to infants in a tonal language: Support for universal prosodic features in motherese Developmental Psychology 24 14 20.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • E. Ochs B. Schieffelin 1984 Language acquisition and socialization: Three developmental stories and their implications R. Shweder R.A. LeVine Culture Theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion Cambridge University New York 276 320.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • C. Kitamura C. Thanavishuth D. Burnham S. Luksaneeyanawin 2002 Universality and specificity in infant-directed speech: Pitch modifications as a function of infant age and sex in a tonal and non-tonal language Infant Behavior & Development 24 372 392.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • M. Papousek H. Papousek D. Symmes 1991 The meanings and melodies in motherese in tone and stress languages Infant Behavior and Development 14 415 440.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • M. D. Pell L. Monetta S. Paulmann S. A. Kotz 2009 Recognizing emotions in a foreign language Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 33 107 120.

  • D. Sauter F. Eisner P. Ekman S. K. Scott 2010 Cross-cultural recognition of basic emotions through nonverbal emotional vocalizations Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 6 2408 2412.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • K.R. Scherer R. Banse H. G. Wallbott 2001 Emotion inferences from vocal expression correlate across languages and cultures Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology 32 76 92.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collapse
  • Expand

Journal of Evolutionary Psychology 
Language English
Size  
Year of
Foundation
2007 (2003)
Publication
Programme
changed title
Volumes
per Year
 
Issues
per Year
 
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1789-2082 (Print)
ISSN 2060-5587 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Dec 2023 30 2 1
Jan 2024 46 1 0
Feb 2024 49 1 0
Mar 2024 40 2 4
Apr 2024 43 0 0
May 2024 39 0 0
Jun 2024 0 0 0